461 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30327918)
1. The Heidelberg VR Score: development and validation of a composite score for laparoscopic virtual reality training.
Schmidt MW; Kowalewski KF; Schmidt ML; Wennberg E; Garrow CR; Paik S; Benner L; Schijven MP; Müller-Stich BP; Nickel F
Surg Endosc; 2019 Jul; 33(7):2093-2103. PubMed ID: 30327918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Comparison of Robotic Simulation Performance on Basic Virtual Reality Skills: Simulator Subjective Versus Objective Assessment Tools.
Dubin AK; Smith R; Julian D; Tanaka A; Mattingly P
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1184-1189. PubMed ID: 28757439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A new virtual-reality training module for laparoscopic surgical skills and equipment handling: can multitasking be trained? A randomized controlled trial.
Bongers PJ; Diederick van Hove P; Stassen LP; Dankelman J; Schreuder HW
J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 25439179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Virtual reality-based assessment of basic laparoscopic skills using the Leap Motion controller.
Lahanas V; Loukas C; Georgiou K; Lababidi H; Al-Jaroudi D
Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5012-5023. PubMed ID: 28466361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. One or two trainees per workplace in a structured multimodality training curriculum for laparoscopic surgery? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial - DRKS00004675.
Nickel F; Jede F; Minassian A; Gondan M; Hendrie JD; Gehrig T; Linke GR; Kadmon M; Fischer L; Müller-Stich BP
Trials; 2014 Apr; 15():137. PubMed ID: 24754961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Continuous Motion Parameter Feedback on Laparoscopic Simulation Training: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial on Skill Acquisition and Retention.
Buescher JF; Mehdorn AS; Neumann PA; Becker F; Eichelmann AK; Pankratius U; Bahde R; Foell D; Senninger N; Rijcken E
J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(2):516-526. PubMed ID: 28864265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of individual hand performance in box trainers compared to virtual reality trainers.
Madan AK; Frantzides CT; Shervin N; Tebbit CL
Am Surg; 2003 Dec; 69(12):1112-4. PubMed ID: 14700302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of a novel virtual reality simulation system with the focus on training for surgical dissection during laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy.
Mori T; Ikeda K; Takeshita N; Teramura K; Ito M
BMC Surg; 2022 Jan; 22(1):12. PubMed ID: 34998376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of a proficiency-based virtual reality simulation training curriculum for laparoscopic appendicectomy.
Sirimanna P; Gladman MA
ANZ J Surg; 2017 Oct; 87(10):760-766. PubMed ID: 28803457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Box- or Virtual-Reality Trainer: Which Tool Results in Better Transfer of Laparoscopic Basic Skills?-A Prospective Randomized Trial.
Brinkmann C; Fritz M; Pankratius U; Bahde R; Neumann P; Schlueter S; Senninger N; Rijcken E
J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(4):724-735. PubMed ID: 28089473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness of laparoscopic computer simulator versus usage of box trainer for endoscopic surgery training of novices.
Diesen DL; Erhunmwunsee L; Bennett KM; Ben-David K; Yurcisin B; Ceppa EP; Omotosho PA; Perez A; Pryor A
J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(4):282-9. PubMed ID: 21708364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Virtual reality does not meet expectations in a pilot study on multimodal laparoscopic surgery training.
Nickel F; Bintintan VV; Gehrig T; Kenngott HG; Fischer L; Gutt CN; Müller-Stich BP
World J Surg; 2013 May; 37(5):965-73. PubMed ID: 23430004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do soft skills predict surgical performance?: a single-center randomized controlled trial evaluating predictors of skill acquisition in virtual reality laparoscopy.
Maschuw K; Schlosser K; Kupietz E; Slater EP; Weyers P; Hassan I
World J Surg; 2011 Mar; 35(3):480-6. PubMed ID: 21190109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transferability of laparoscopic skills using the virtual reality simulator.
Yang C; Kalinitschenko U; Helmert JR; Weitz J; Reissfelder C; Mees ST
Surg Endosc; 2018 Oct; 32(10):4132-4137. PubMed ID: 29602986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective Cohort Study of Haptic Virtual Reality Laparoscopic Appendicectomy Learning Curve Trajectory.
Brown C; Robinson D; Egan R; Hopkins L; Abdelrahman T; Powell A; Pollitt MJ; Lewis WG
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Sep; 29(9):1128-1134. PubMed ID: 31361560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Learning rate for laparoscopic surgical skills on MIST VR, a virtual reality simulator: quality of human-computer interface.
Chaudhry A; Sutton C; Wood J; Stone R; McCloy R
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1999 Jul; 81(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 10615201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Attempted establishment of proficiency levels for laparoscopic performance on a national scale using simulation: the results from the 2004 SAGES Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer-Virtual Reality (MIST-VR) learning center study.
Van Sickle KR; Ritter EM; McClusky DA; Lederman A; Baghai M; Gallagher AG; Smith CD
Surg Endosc; 2007 Jan; 21(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 17111280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Convergent validation and transfer of learning studies of a virtual reality-based pattern cutting simulator.
Nemani A; Ahn W; Cooper C; Schwaitzberg S; De S
Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1265-1272. PubMed ID: 28812196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and implementation of a virtual reality laparoscopic colorectal training curriculum.
Wynn G; Lykoudis P; Berlingieri P
Am J Surg; 2018 Sep; 216(3):610-617. PubMed ID: 29268942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Single-session baseline virtual reality simulator scores predict technical performance for laparoscopic colectomy: a study in the swine model.
Araujo SE; Seid VE; Bertoncini AB; Horcel LA; Nahas SC; Cecconello I
J Surg Educ; 2014; 71(6):883-91. PubMed ID: 24994032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
