These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30328011)

  • 41. Effect of increased wood harvesting and utilization on required greenhouse gas displacement factors of wood-based products and fuels.
    Seppälä J; Heinonen T; Pukkala T; Kilpeläinen A; Mattila T; Myllyviita T; Asikainen A; Peltola H
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Oct; 247():580-587. PubMed ID: 31260924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A Land Use and Resource Allocation (LURA) modeling system for projecting localized forest CO
    Latta GS; Baker JS; Ohrel S
    For Policy Econ; 2017 Nov; 87():35-48. PubMed ID: 32280299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Potential stocks and increments of woody biomass in the European Union under different management and climate scenarios.
    Kindermann GE; Schörghuber S; Linkosalo T; Sanchez A; Rammer W; Seidl R; Lexer MJ
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2013 Feb; 8(1):2. PubMed ID: 23369357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Carbon accounting rules and guidelines for the United States forest sector.
    Birdsey RA
    J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(4):1518-24. PubMed ID: 16825472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Contribution of forest wood products to negative emissions: historical comparative analysis from 1960 to 2015 in Norway, Sweden and Finland.
    Iordan CM; Hu X; Arvesen A; Kauppi P; Cherubini F
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2018 Sep; 13(1):12. PubMed ID: 30182155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Carbon profile of the managed forest sector in Canada in the 20th century: sink or source?
    Chen J; Colombo SJ; Ter-Mikaelian MT; Heath LS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Aug; 48(16):9859-66. PubMed ID: 25075978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Interactive effects of environmental change and management strategies on regional forest carbon emissions.
    Hudiburg TW; Luyssaert S; Thornton PE; Law BE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Nov; 47(22):13132-40. PubMed ID: 24138534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Is enhanced biodiversity protection conflicting with ambitious bioenergy targets in eastern Finland?
    den Herder M; Kurttila M; Leskinen P; Lindner M; Haatanen A; Sironen S; Salminen O; Juusti V; Holma A
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Feb; 187():54-62. PubMed ID: 27883939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Forest soil carbon is threatened by intensive biomass harvesting.
    Achat DL; Fortin M; Landmann G; Ringeval B; Augusto L
    Sci Rep; 2015 Nov; 5():15991. PubMed ID: 26530409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Trade-offs between carbon stocks and timber recovery in tropical forests are mediated by logging intensity.
    Roopsind A; Caughlin TT; van der Hout P; Arets E; Putz FE
    Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Jul; 24(7):2862-2874. PubMed ID: 29603495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Dynamics of carbon and CO
    Sanquetta CR; Dalla Corte AP; Pelissari AL; Tomé M; Maas GCB; Sanquetta MNI
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2018 Oct; 13(1):20. PubMed ID: 30350249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Altered growth conditions more than reforestation counteracted forest biomass carbon emissions 1990-2020.
    Le Noë J; Erb KH; Matej S; Magerl A; Bhan M; Gingrich S
    Nat Commun; 2021 Oct; 12(1):6075. PubMed ID: 34667185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Innovative wood use can enable carbon-beneficial forest management in California.
    Cabiyo B; Fried JS; Collins BM; Stewart W; Wong J; Sanchez DL
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Dec; 118(49):. PubMed ID: 34810238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Do forests best mitigate CO
    Taeroe A; Mustapha WF; Stupak I; Raulund-Rasmussen K
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Jul; 197():117-129. PubMed ID: 28351817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Understanding and managing leakage in forest-based greenhouse-gas-mitigation projects.
    Schwarze R; Niles JO; Olander J
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2002 Aug; 360(1797):1685-703. PubMed ID: 12460492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Greenhouse gas emissions, carbon leakage and net carbon sequestration from afforestation and forest management: A review.].
    Liu BJ; Lu F; Wang XK; Liu WW
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2017 Feb; 28(2):673-688. PubMed ID: 29749178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Carbon sequestration in European croplands.
    Smith P; Falloon P
    SEB Exp Biol Ser; 2005; ():47-55. PubMed ID: 17633030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Forest bioenergy or forest carbon? Assessing trade-offs in greenhouse gas mitigation with wood-based fuels.
    McKechnie J; Colombo S; Chen J; Mabee W; MacLean HL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(2):789-95. PubMed ID: 21142063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Estimating the effect of abandoning coppice management on carbon sequestration by oak forests in Turkey with a modeling approach.
    Lee J; Makineci E; Tolunay D; Son Y
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Nov; 640-641():400-405. PubMed ID: 29864656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Role of forest regrowth in global carbon sink dynamics.
    Pugh TAM; Lindeskog M; Smith B; Poulter B; Arneth A; Haverd V; Calle L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Mar; 116(10):4382-4387. PubMed ID: 30782807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.