345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30328206)
1. Survival rates of short dental implants (≤6 mm) compared with implants longer than 6 mm in posterior jaw areas: A meta-analysis.
Papaspyridakos P; De Souza A; Vazouras K; Gholami H; Pagni S; Weber HP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():8-20. PubMed ID: 30328206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of time in function on the predictability of short dental implants (≤6 mm): A meta-analysis.
Vazouras K; de Souza AB; Gholami H; Papaspyridakos P; Pagni S; Weber HP
J Oral Rehabil; 2020 Mar; 47(3):403-415. PubMed ID: 31846097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lemos CA; Ferro-Alves ML; Okamoto R; Mendonça MR; Pellizzer EP
J Dent; 2016 Apr; 47():8-17. PubMed ID: 26804969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A meta-analysis indicating extra-short implants (≤ 6 mm) as an alternative to longer implants (≥ 8 mm) with bone augmentation.
Yu X; Xu R; Zhang Z; Yang Y; Deng F
Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):8152. PubMed ID: 33854095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are <7-mm long implants in native bone as effective as longer implants in augmented bone for the rehabilitation of posterior atrophic jaws? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Iezzi G; Perrotti V; Felice P; Barausse C; Piattelli A; Del Fabbro M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Oct; 22(5):552-566. PubMed ID: 32902123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Short implants had lower survival rates in posterior jaws compared to standard implants.
Stafford GL
Evid Based Dent; 2016 Dec; 17(4):115-116. PubMed ID: 27980324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do short implants have similar survival rates compared to standard implants in posterior single crown?: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Tolentino da Rosa de Souza P; Binhame Albini Martini M; Reis Azevedo-Alanis L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Oct; 20(5):890-901. PubMed ID: 30051949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Short implants versus longer implants in the posterior alveolar region after an observation period of at least five years: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Xu X; Huang J; Fu X; Kuang Y; Yue H; Song J; Xu L
J Dent; 2020 Sep; 100():103386. PubMed ID: 32479956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Short implants versus bone grafting and standard-length implants placement: a systematic review.
Palacios JAV; Garcia JJ; Caramês JMM; Quirynen M; da Silva Marques DN
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Jan; 22(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 28986692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short implants (5-8 mm) vs long implants (≥10 mm) with augmentation in atrophic posterior jaws: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Chen S; Ou Q; Wang Y; Lin X
J Oral Rehabil; 2019 Dec; 46(12):1192-1203. PubMed ID: 31295755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. EAO Supplement Working Group 4 - EAO CC 2015 Short implants versus sinus lifting with longer implants to restore the posterior maxilla: a systematic review.
Thoma DS; Zeltner M; Hüsler J; Hämmerle CH; Jung RE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Sep; 26 Suppl 11():154-69. PubMed ID: 25997901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retrospective study of short and extra-short implants placed in posterior regions: influence of crown-to-implant ratio on marginal bone loss.
Anitua E; Piñas L; Orive G
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Feb; 17(1):102-10. PubMed ID: 23656303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of external and internal implant-abutment connections for implant supported prostheses. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Bonfante EA; Santiago Júnior JF; Pellizzer EP
J Dent; 2018 Mar; 70():14-22. PubMed ID: 29221955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ten-year follow-up of dental implants used for immediate loading in the edentulous mandible: A prospective clinical study.
Windael S; Vervaeke S; Wijnen L; Jacquet W; De Bruyn H; Collaert B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Aug; 20(4):515-521. PubMed ID: 29791063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Group 1 ITI Consensus Report: The influence of implant length and design and medications on clinical and patient-reported outcomes.
Jung RE; Al-Nawas B; Araujo M; Avila-Ortiz G; Barter S; Brodala N; Chappuis V; Chen B; De Souza A; Almeida RF; Fickl S; Finelle G; Ganeles J; Gholami H; Hammerle C; Jensen S; Jokstad A; Katsuyama H; Kleinheinz J; Kunavisarut C; Mardas N; Monje A; Papaspyridakos P; Payer M; Schiegnitz E; Smeets R; Stefanini M; Ten Bruggenkate C; Vazouras K; Weber HP; Weingart D; Windisch P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():69-77. PubMed ID: 30328189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance and outcome of zirconia dental implants in clinical studies: A meta-analysis.
Roehling S; Schlegel KA; Woelfler H; Gahlert M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():135-153. PubMed ID: 30328200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of survival rate and crestal bone loss of narrow diameter dental implants versus regular dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Alrabiah M
J Investig Clin Dent; 2019 Feb; 10(1):e12367. PubMed ID: 30414262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Short Implants (5 to 8 mm) Versus Longer Implants (>8 mm) with Sinus Lifting in Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: A Meta-Analysis of RCTs.
Fan T; Li Y; Deng WW; Wu T; Zhang W
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 19(1):207-215. PubMed ID: 27295262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Narrow-diameter implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Schiegnitz E; Al-Nawas B
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():21-40. PubMed ID: 30328192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Short dental implants: a systematic review.
Annibali S; Cristalli MP; Dell'Aquila D; Bignozzi I; La Monaca G; Pilloni A
J Dent Res; 2012 Jan; 91(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 22034499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
