These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30328506)

  • 1. No evaluative conditioning effects with briefly presented stimuli.
    Heycke T; Stahl C
    Psychol Res; 2020 Jun; 84(4):1020-1027. PubMed ID: 30328506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Subliminal influence on preferences? A test of evaluative conditioning for brief visual conditioned stimuli using auditory unconditioned stimuli.
    Heycke T; Aust F; Stahl C
    R Soc Open Sci; 2017 Sep; 4(9):160935. PubMed ID: 28989730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluative conditioning increases with temporal contiguity. The influence of stimulus order and stimulus interval on evaluative conditioning.
    Gast A; Langer S; Sengewald MA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Oct; 170():177-85. PubMed ID: 27543928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unconscious conditioning: Demonstration of existence and difference from conscious conditioning.
    Greenwald AG; De Houwer J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Dec; 146(12):1705-1721. PubMed ID: 29251984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the respective contributions of awareness of unconditioned stimulus valence and unconditioned stimulus identity in attitude formation through evaluative conditioning.
    Stahl C; Unkelbach C; Corneille O
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Sep; 97(3):404-20. PubMed ID: 19685998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluative learning with single versus multiple unconditioned stimuli: the role of contingency awareness.
    Stahl C; Unkelbach C
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):286-91. PubMed ID: 19364238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. I like it because I said that I like it: evaluative conditioning effects can be based on stimulus-response learning.
    Gast A; Rothermund K
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Oct; 37(4):466-76. PubMed ID: 21500929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Subliminal evaluative conditioning? Above-chance CS identification may be necessary and insufficient for attitude learning.
    Stahl C; Haaf J; Corneille O
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Sep; 145(9):1107-31. PubMed ID: 27348289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluative conditioning of artificial grammars: Evidence that subjectively-unconscious structures bias affective evaluations of novel stimuli.
    Jurchiș R; Costea A; Dienes Z; Miclea M; Opre A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Sep; 149(9):1800-1809. PubMed ID: 31916836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of CS-US contingency in human evaluative conditioning.
    Baeyens F; Hermans D; Eelen P
    Behav Res Ther; 1993 Nov; 31(8):731-7. PubMed ID: 8257404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluative conditioning may incur attentional costs.
    Pleyers G; Corneille O; Yzerbyt V; Luminet O
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):279-85. PubMed ID: 19364237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Positive, negative, or all relative? Evaluative conditioning of ambivalence.
    Glaser T; Woud ML; Labib Iskander M; Schmalenstroth V; Vo TM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Apr; 185():155-165. PubMed ID: 29482089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluative conditioning without directly experienced pairings of the conditioned and the unconditioned stimuli.
    Gast A; De Houwer J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(9):1657-74. PubMed ID: 22512240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does evaluative conditioning depend on awareness? Evidence from a continuous flash suppression paradigm.
    Högden F; Hütter M; Unkelbach C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Oct; 44(10):1641-1657. PubMed ID: 29481103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aversive conditioning under conditions of restricted awareness: effects on spatial cueing.
    Raes AK; Koster EH; Van Damme S; Fias W; De Raedt R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Dec; 63(12):2336-58. PubMed ID: 20687009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When congruence breeds preference: the influence of selective attention processes on evaluative conditioning.
    Blask K; Walther E; Frings C
    Cogn Emot; 2017 Sep; 31(6):1127-1139. PubMed ID: 27338588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Extinction of likes and dislikes: effects of feature-specific attention allocation.
    Vanaelst J; Spruyt A; Everaert T; De Houwer J
    Cogn Emot; 2017 Dec; 31(8):1595-1609. PubMed ID: 27838952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluative conditioning with fear- and disgust-evoking stimuli: no evidence that they increase learning without explicit memory.
    Benedict T; Gast A
    Cogn Emot; 2020 Feb; 34(1):42-56. PubMed ID: 31340717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aware and (dis)liking: item-based analyses reveal that valence acquisition via evaluative conditioning emerges only when there is contingency awareness.
    Pleyers G; Corneille O; Luminet O; Yzerbyt V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jan; 33(1):130-44. PubMed ID: 17201557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implicit misattribution of evaluative responses: contingency-unaware evaluative conditioning requires simultaneous stimulus presentations.
    Hütter M; Sweldens S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Aug; 142(3):638-43. PubMed ID: 22946896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.