BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30328632)

  • 21. Computerized analysis of digital subtraction angiography: a tool for quantitative in-vivo vascular imaging.
    Kagadis GC; Spyridonos P; Karnabatidis D; Diamantopoulos A; Athanasiadis E; Daskalakis A; Katsanos K; Cavouras D; Mihailidis D; Siablis D; Nikiforidis GC
    J Digit Imaging; 2008 Dec; 21(4):433-45. PubMed ID: 17674102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Shade matching assisted by digital photography and computer software.
    Schropp L
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 19141046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. New Atrophic Acne Scar Classification: Reliability of Assessments Based on Size, Shape, and Number.
    Kang S; Lozada VT; Bettoli V; Tan J; Rueda MJ; Layton A; Petit L; Dréno B
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2016 Jun; 15(6):693-702. PubMed ID: 27272075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dermatologic Scar Assessment With Stereoscopic Imaging and Digital Three-Dimensional Models: A Validation Study.
    Hendel K; Ortner VK; Fuchs CSK; Eckhouse V; Haedersdal M
    Lasers Surg Med; 2021 Oct; 53(8):1043-1049. PubMed ID: 33389766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Objective scar assessment--a new method using standardized digital imaging and spectral modelling.
    Kaartinen IS; Välisuo PO; Alander JT; Kuokkanen HO
    Burns; 2011 Feb; 37(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 20510521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Thirty-five millimeter versus digital photography: comparison of photographic quality and clinical evaluation.
    Wall S; Kazahaya K; Becker SS; Becker DG
    Facial Plast Surg; 1999; 15(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 11816120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Efficacy of low-level laser therapy on scar tissue.
    Freitas CP; Melo C; Alexandrino AM; Noites A
    J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2013 Jun; 15(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 23607736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Wound areas by computerized planimetry of digital images: accuracy and reliability.
    Mayrovitz HN; Soontupe LB
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2009 May; 22(5):222-9. PubMed ID: 19521289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. CorneaJ: an imageJ Plugin for semi-automated measurement of corneal endothelial cell viability.
    Bernard A; Campolmi N; He Z; Ha Thi BM; Piselli S; Forest F; Dumollard JM; Peocʼh M; Acquart S; Gain P; Thuret G
    Cornea; 2014 Jun; 33(6):604-9. PubMed ID: 24727636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Objective quantification of subjective parameters in scars by use of a portable stereophotographic system.
    Lumenta DB; Kitzinger HB; Selig H; Kamolz LP
    Ann Plast Surg; 2011 Dec; 67(6):641-5. PubMed ID: 22123541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Optical coherence tomography for longitudinal monitoring of vasculature in scars treated with laser fractionation.
    Gong P; Es'haghian S; Harms KA; Murray A; Rea S; Kennedy BF; Wood FM; Sampson DD; McLaughlin RA
    J Biophotonics; 2016 Jun; 9(6):626-36. PubMed ID: 26260918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Low cost digital endoscopic photography.
    Barr GD
    J Laryngol Otol; 2009 Apr; 123(4):453-6. PubMed ID: 18925997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Three-dimensional phase-sensitive inversion-recovery turbo FLASH sequence for the evaluation of left ventricular myocardial scar.
    Kino A; Zuehlsdorff S; Sheehan JJ; Weale PJ; Carroll TJ; Jerecic R; Carr JC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):W381-8. PubMed ID: 19843715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. REAVER: A program for improved analysis of high-resolution vascular network images.
    Corliss BA; Doty RW; Mathews C; Yates PA; Zhang T; Peirce SM
    Microcirculation; 2020 Jul; 27(5):e12618. PubMed ID: 32173962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Alignment and articular orientation of lower limbs: manual vs computer-aided measurements on digital radiograms.
    Rozzanigo U; Pizzoli A; Minari C; Caudana R
    Radiol Med; 2005 Mar; 109(3):234-8. PubMed ID: 15775892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Objective assessment of cosmetic outcome of scars].
    Handschel JG; Depprich RA; Dirksen D; Runte C; Zimmermann A; Böröcz Z; Kübler NR
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2005 Nov; 9(6):396-9. PubMed ID: 16142457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In vivo measurement of corneal angiogenesis with video data acquisition and computerized image analysis.
    Conrad TJ; Chandler DB; Corless JM; Klintworth GK
    Lab Invest; 1994 Mar; 70(3):426-34. PubMed ID: 7511717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Validation of 3D skin imaging for objective repeatable quantification of severity of atrophic acne scarring.
    Petit L; Zugaj D; Bettoli V; Dreno B; Kang S; Tan J; Torres V; Layton AM; Martel P
    Skin Res Technol; 2018 Nov; 24(4):542-550. PubMed ID: 29512189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Observation on the clinical application effects of skin distractor on the treatment of scars].
    Gui WL; Yang E; Zhang HS
    Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2017 Mar; 33(3):139-144. PubMed ID: 28316162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Computerized analysis of retinal vessel width and tortuosity in premature infants.
    Wilson CM; Cocker KD; Moseley MJ; Paterson C; Clay ST; Schulenburg WE; Mills MD; Ells AL; Parker KH; Quinn GE; Fielder AR; Ng J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Aug; 49(8):3577-85. PubMed ID: 18408177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.