These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30328632)

  • 61. ImageJ: A Free, Easy, and Reliable Method to Measure Leg Ulcers Using Digital Pictures.
    Aragón-Sánchez J; Quintana-Marrero Y; Aragón-Hernández C; Hernández-Herero MJ
    Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2017 Dec; 16(4):269-273. PubMed ID: 29251541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Three-Dimensional Photography for Quantitative Assessment of Penile Volume-Loss Deformities in Peyronie's Disease.
    Margolin EJ; Mlynarczyk CM; Mulhall JP; Stember DS; Stahl PJ
    J Sex Med; 2017 Jun; 14(6):829-833. PubMed ID: 28460995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Documenting changes in burn scars over time.
    Richard RL
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 2005; 26(3):272. PubMed ID: 15879751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Consistent cutaneous imaging with commercial digital cameras.
    Vander Haeghen Y; Naeyaert JM
    Arch Dermatol; 2006 Jan; 142(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 16415385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Measurements of linear dimensions on fundus photographs: comparison between photographic film and digital systems.
    Musadiq M; Patsoura E; Hughes S; Yang YC
    Eye (Lond); 2003 Jul; 17(5):619-22. PubMed ID: 12855971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Automated, computer-guided PASI measurements by digital image analysis versus conventional physicians' PASI calculations: study protocol for a comparative, single-centre, observational study.
    Fink C; Uhlmann L; Klose C; Haenssle HA
    BMJ Open; 2018 May; 8(5):e018461. PubMed ID: 29773695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. [Digital photography as an object of forensic medical examination].
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2005; 48(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 15747849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. A critical analysis of measurements used to assess and manage scars.
    Roques C; Teot L
    Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2007 Dec; 6(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 18048870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Vascular patterns in mature hypertrophic burn scars treated with fractional CO2 laser.
    Connolly KL; Chaffins M; Ozog D
    Lasers Surg Med; 2014 Oct; 46(8):597-600. PubMed ID: 25073421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Evaluation of speed, repeatability, and reproducibility of digital radiography with manual versus computer-assisted cephalometric analyses.
    Uysal T; Baysal A; Yagci A
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 19443692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Optimal placement of a brachioplasty scar: a survey evaluation.
    Samra S; Samra F; Liu YJ; Sawh-Martinez R; Persing J
    Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Oct; 71(4):329-32. PubMed ID: 23407254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Digital imaging of wounds: are measurements reproducible among observers?
    Quan SY; Lazarus GS; Kohli AR; Kapoor R; Margolis DJ
    Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2007 Dec; 6(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 18048869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Software for quantifying psoriasis and vitiligo from digital clinical photographs.
    Kislal EE; Halasz CL
    J Dermatolog Treat; 2013 Apr; 24(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 21801117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Assessment of a fully automated, high-throughput mammographic density measurement tool for use with processed digital mammograms.
    Couwenberg AM; Verkooijen HM; Li J; Pijnappel RM; Charaghvandi KR; Hartman M; van Gils CH
    Cancer Causes Control; 2014 Aug; 25(8):1037-43. PubMed ID: 24962023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Evaluation of effectiveness of erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser on atrophic facial acne scars with 22-MHz digital ultrasonography in a Turkish population.
    Engın B; Kutlubay Z; Karakuş Ö; Yardimci G; Doğan Z; Tüzün Y; Serdaroğlu S
    J Dermatol; 2012 Dec; 39(12):982-8. PubMed ID: 22973994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Ultrasound imaging of breast tumor perfusion and neovascular morphology.
    Hoyt K; Umphrey H; Lockhart M; Robbin M; Forero-Torres A
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Sep; 41(9):2292-302. PubMed ID: 26116159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Distribution of normal superficial ocular vessels in digital images.
    Banaee T; Ehsaei A; Pourreza H; Khajedaluee M; Abrishami M; Basiri M; Daneshvar Kakhki R; Pourreza R
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Feb; 37(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 23962767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. High-resolution ultrasound reflex transmission imaging and digital photography: potential tools for the quantitative assessment of pigmented lesions.
    Rallan D; Dickson M; Bush NL; Harland CC; Mortimer P; Bamber JC
    Skin Res Technol; 2006 Feb; 12(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 16420539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Photography without film: low-cost digital cameras come of age in dermatology.
    Sasson M; Schiff T; Stiller MJ
    Int J Dermatol; 1994 Feb; 33(2):113-5. PubMed ID: 8157391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Endoscopic photography: digital or 35 mm?
    Melder PC; Mair EA
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2003 May; 129(5):570-5. PubMed ID: 12759272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.