These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30328677)

  • 1. Methodological considerations for interpreting the Language Familiarity Effect in talker processing.
    Levi SV
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2019 Mar; 10(2):e1483. PubMed ID: 30328677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of language experience and task demands on talker recognition by children and adults.
    Fecher N; Johnson EK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Apr; 143(4):2409. PubMed ID: 29716261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phonotactic and lexical factors in talker discrimination and identification.
    El Adas SA; Levi SV
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jul; 84(5):1788-1804. PubMed ID: 35641859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Talker-familiarity benefit in non-native recognition memory and word identification: The role of listening conditions and proficiency.
    Drozdova P; van Hout R; Scharenborg O
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1675-1697. PubMed ID: 30834484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Working-memory disruption by task-irrelevant talkers depends on degree of talker familiarity.
    Kreitewolf J; Wöstmann M; Tune S; Plöchl M; Obleser J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1108-1118. PubMed ID: 30993655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Talker familiarity and the accommodation of talker variability.
    Magnuson JS; Nusbaum HC; Akahane-Yamada R; Saltzman D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 May; 83(4):1842-1860. PubMed ID: 33398658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gradient language dominance affects talker learning.
    Bregman MR; Creel SC
    Cognition; 2014 Jan; 130(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 24211437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The native-language benefit for talker identification is robust in 7.5-month-old infants.
    Fecher N; Johnson EK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1911-1920. PubMed ID: 29698034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Talker Processing in Mandarin-Speaking Congenital Amusics.
    Shao J; Wang L; Zhang C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 May; 63(5):1361-1375. PubMed ID: 32343927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural basis of language familiarity effects on voice recognition: An fNIRS study.
    Meng Y; Liang C; Chen W; Liu Z; Yang C; Hu J; Gao Z; Gao S
    Cortex; 2024 Jul; 176():1-10. PubMed ID: 38723449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Language-general versus language-specific processes in bilingual voice learning.
    Lloy L; Patil KN; Johnson KA; Babel M
    Cognition; 2024 Sep; 250():105866. PubMed ID: 38971020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differential neural contributions to native- and foreign-language talker identification.
    Perrachione TK; Pierrehumbert JB; Wong PC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1950-60. PubMed ID: 19968445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Talker and accent familiarity yield advantages for voice identity perception: A voice sorting study.
    Njie S; Lavan N; McGettigan C
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Jan; 51(1):175-187. PubMed ID: 35274221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How Different Types of Linguistic Information Impact Voice Perception: Evidence From the Language-Familiarity Effect.
    Yu K; Zhou Y; Zhang L; Li L; Li P; Wang R
    Lang Speech; 2023 Dec; 66(4):1007-1029. PubMed ID: 36680473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Audiovisual speech facilitates voice learning.
    Sheffert SM; Olson E
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Feb; 66(2):352-62. PubMed ID: 15129754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does Implicit Voice Learning Improve Spoken Language Processing? Implications for Clinical Practice.
    Case J; Seyfarth S; Levi SV
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 May; 61(5):1251-1260. PubMed ID: 29800358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abstraction and the (Misnamed) Language Familiarity Effect.
    Johnson EK; Bruggeman L; Cutler A
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Mar; 42(2):633-645. PubMed ID: 28744902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developmental improvements in talker recognition are specific to the native language.
    Fecher N; Johnson EK
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2021 Feb; 202():104991. PubMed ID: 33096370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiple levels of linguistic and paralinguistic features contribute to voice recognition.
    Zarate JM; Tian X; Woods KJ; Poeppel D
    Sci Rep; 2015 Jun; 5():11475. PubMed ID: 26088739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Another bilingual advantage? Perception of talker-voice information.
    Levi S
    Biling (Camb Engl); 2018 May; 21(3):523-536. PubMed ID: 29755282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.