These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30332357)

  • 1. An in vitro assessment of bacterial transfer by products used in debridement.
    Rippon MG; Rogers AA; Sellars L; Purcell LEJ; Westgate S
    J Wound Care; 2018 Oct; 27(10):679-685. PubMed ID: 30332357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of a non-medicated wound dressing on attached and biofilm encased bacteria: laboratory and clinical evidence.
    Rippon MG; Rogers AA; Sellars L; Styles KM; Westgate S
    J Wound Care; 2018 Mar; 27(3):146-155. PubMed ID: 29509112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of a polyhexamethylene biguanide-containing wound cleansing solution using experimental biofilm models.
    Rippon M; Rogers AA; Westgate S; Ousey K
    J Wound Care; 2023 Jun; 32(6):359-367. PubMed ID: 37300862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treating drug-resistant wound pathogens with non-medicated dressings: an
    Rippon MG; Rogers AA; Westgate S
    J Wound Care; 2019 Sep; 28(9):629-638. PubMed ID: 31513496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of a novel, antimicrobial dressing on in vivo, Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound biofilm: quantitative comparative analysis using a rabbit ear model.
    Seth AK; Zhong A; Nguyen KT; Hong SJ; Leung KP; Galiano RD; Mustoe TA
    Wound Repair Regen; 2014; 22(6):712-9. PubMed ID: 25230854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A multicentre, clinical evaluation of a hydro-responsive wound dressing: the Glasgow experience.
    Hodgson H; Davidson D; Duncan A; Guthrie J; Henderson E; MacDiarmid M; McGown K; Pollard V; Potter R; Rodgers A; Wilson A; Horner J; Doran M; Simm S; Taylor R; Rogers A; Rippon MG; Colgrave M
    J Wound Care; 2017 Nov; 26(11):642-650. PubMed ID: 29131748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development, characterization, and evaluation of a simple polymicrobial colony biofilm model for testing of antimicrobial wound dressings.
    Robertson SN; Romero M; Fenn S; Kohler Riedi PL; Cámara M
    J Appl Microbiol; 2024 Mar; 135(3):. PubMed ID: 38366933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of flow cytometry to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of silver-containing wound dressings against planktonic Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Percival SL; Slone W; Linton S; Okel T; Corum L; Thomas JG
    Wound Repair Regen; 2011; 19(3):436-41. PubMed ID: 21518089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of human acute wound fluid on the antibacterial efficacy of different antiseptic polyurethane foam dressings: An in vitro analysis.
    Rembe JD; Fromm-Dornieden C; Böhm J; Stuermer EK
    Wound Repair Regen; 2018 Jan; 26(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 29363857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A surfactant-based wound dressing can reduce bacterial biofilms in a porcine skin explant model.
    Yang Q; Larose C; Della Porta AC; Schultz GS; Gibson DJ
    Int Wound J; 2017 Apr; 14(2):408-413. PubMed ID: 27212453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of a monofilament wound debridement pad at removing biofilm and slough: ex vivo and clinical performance.
    Schultz GS; Woo K; Weir D; Yang Q
    J Wound Care; 2018 Feb; 27(2):80-90. PubMed ID: 29424644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inhibition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation on wound dressings.
    Brandenburg KS; Calderon DF; Kierski PR; Brown AL; Shah NM; Abbott NL; Schurr MJ; Murphy CJ; McAnulty JF; Czuprynski CJ
    Wound Repair Regen; 2015; 23(6):842-54. PubMed ID: 26342168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A novel in vitro wound biofilm model used to evaluate low-frequency ultrasonic-assisted wound debridement.
    Crone S; Garde C; Bjarnsholt T; Alhede M
    J Wound Care; 2015 Feb; 24(2):64, 66-9, 72. PubMed ID: 25647434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Antimicrobial dressing efficacy against mature Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm on porcine skin explants.
    Phillips PL; Yang Q; Davis S; Sampson EM; Azeke JI; Hamad A; Schultz GS
    Int Wound J; 2015 Aug; 12(4):469-83. PubMed ID: 24028432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Novel murine model for delayed wound healing using a biological wound dressing with Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.
    Brandenburg KS; Calderon DF; Kierski PR; Czuprynski CJ; McAnulty JF
    Microb Pathog; 2018 Sep; 122():30-38. PubMed ID: 29842898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of a bioluminescent Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain within an in vitro microbiological system, as a model of wound infection, to assess the antimicrobial efficacy of wound dressings by monitoring light production.
    Thorn RM; Nelson SM; Greenman J
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2007 Sep; 51(9):3217-24. PubMed ID: 17638701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of superabsorbent dressings in a 3D acellular tissue model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm.
    Larkö E; Persson A; Blom K
    J Wound Care; 2015 May; 24(5):204, 206-10. PubMed ID: 25970757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An ultrathin poly(L-lactic acid) nanosheet as a burn wound dressing for protection against bacterial infection.
    Miyazaki H; Kinoshita M; Saito A; Fujie T; Kabata K; Hara E; Ono S; Takeoka S; Saitoh D
    Wound Repair Regen; 2012; 20(4):573-9. PubMed ID: 22712440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a bi-layer wound dressing for burn care. II. In vitro and in vivo bactericidal properties.
    Martineau L; Shek PN
    Burns; 2006 Mar; 32(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 16455202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A novel in vitro flat-bed perfusion biofilm model for determining the potential antimicrobial efficacy of topical wound treatments.
    Thorn RM; Greenman J
    J Appl Microbiol; 2009 Dec; 107(6):2070-9. PubMed ID: 19548886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.