236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30332399)
1. Genomic data integration systematically biases interactome mapping.
Skinnider MA; Stacey RG; Foster LJ
PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Oct; 14(10):e1006474. PubMed ID: 30332399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High-quality binary interactome mapping.
Dreze M; Monachello D; Lurin C; Cusick ME; Hill DE; Vidal M; Braun P
Methods Enzymol; 2010; 470():281-315. PubMed ID: 20946815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enriching Human Interactome with Functional Mutations to Detect High-Impact Network Modules Underlying Complex Diseases.
Cui H; Srinivasan S; Korkin D
Genes (Basel); 2019 Nov; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 31731769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New insights into protein-protein interaction data lead to increased estimates of the S. cerevisiae interactome size.
Sambourg L; Thierry-Mieg N
BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Dec; 11():605. PubMed ID: 21176124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Domain-based prediction of the human isoform interactome provides insights into the functional impact of alternative splicing.
Ghadie MA; Lambourne L; Vidal M; Xia Y
PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Aug; 13(8):e1005717. PubMed ID: 28846689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An empirical framework for binary interactome mapping.
Venkatesan K; Rual JF; Vazquez A; Stelzl U; Lemmens I; Hirozane-Kishikawa T; Hao T; Zenkner M; Xin X; Goh KI; Yildirim MA; Simonis N; Heinzmann K; Gebreab F; Sahalie JM; Cevik S; Simon C; de Smet AS; Dann E; Smolyar A; Vinayagam A; Yu H; Szeto D; Borick H; Dricot A; Klitgord N; Murray RR; Lin C; Lalowski M; Timm J; Rau K; Boone C; Braun P; Cusick ME; Roth FP; Hill DE; Tavernier J; Wanker EE; Barabási AL; Vidal M
Nat Methods; 2009 Jan; 6(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 19060904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identification of functional hubs and modules by converting interactome networks into hierarchical ordering of proteins.
Cho YR; Zhang A
BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Apr; 11 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S3. PubMed ID: 20438650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Charting plant interactomes: possibilities and challenges.
Morsy M; Gouthu S; Orchard S; Thorneycroft D; Harper JF; Mittler R; Cushman JC
Trends Plant Sci; 2008 Apr; 13(4):183-91. PubMed ID: 18329319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interactome INSIDER: a structural interactome browser for genomic studies.
Meyer MJ; Beltrán JF; Liang S; Fragoza R; Rumack A; Liang J; Wei X; Yu H
Nat Methods; 2018 Feb; 15(2):107-114. PubMed ID: 29355848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Exploring mitochondrial system properties of neurodegenerative diseases through interactome mapping.
Vlasblom J; Jin K; Kassir S; Babu M
J Proteomics; 2014 Apr; 100():8-24. PubMed ID: 24262152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A rapid and accurate approach for prediction of interactomes from co-elution data (PrInCE).
Stacey RG; Skinnider MA; Scott NE; Foster LJ
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Oct; 18(1):457. PubMed ID: 29061110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Large-scale mapping of human protein interactome using structural complexes.
Tyagi M; Hashimoto K; Shoemaker BA; Wuchty S; Panchenko AR
EMBO Rep; 2012 Mar; 13(3):266-71. PubMed ID: 22261719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Clostridium difficille interactomes: demonstration of rapid development of computational system for bacterial interactome prediction.
Ananthasubramanian S; Metri R; Khetan A; Gupta A; Handen A; Chandra N; Ganapathiraju M
Microb Inform Exp; 2012 Mar; 2():4. PubMed ID: 22587966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Empirically controlled mapping of the Caenorhabditis elegans protein-protein interactome network.
Simonis N; Rual JF; Carvunis AR; Tasan M; Lemmens I; Hirozane-Kishikawa T; Hao T; Sahalie JM; Venkatesan K; Gebreab F; Cevik S; Klitgord N; Fan C; Braun P; Li N; Ayivi-Guedehoussou N; Dann E; Bertin N; Szeto D; Dricot A; Yildirim MA; Lin C; de Smet AS; Kao HL; Simon C; Smolyar A; Ahn JS; Tewari M; Boxem M; Milstein S; Yu H; Dreze M; Vandenhaute J; Gunsalus KC; Cusick ME; Hill DE; Tavernier J; Roth FP; Vidal M
Nat Methods; 2009 Jan; 6(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 19123269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Methods Employed in Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Posttranslational Modifications (PTMs) and Protein-Protein Interactions (PPIs).
Yakubu RR; Nieves E; Weiss LM
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2019; 1140():169-198. PubMed ID: 31347048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. SPRINT: ultrafast protein-protein interaction prediction of the entire human interactome.
Li Y; Ilie L
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):485. PubMed ID: 29141584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Information flow analysis of interactome networks.
Missiuro PV; Liu K; Zou L; Ross BC; Zhao G; Liu JS; Ge H
PLoS Comput Biol; 2009 Apr; 5(4):e1000350. PubMed ID: 19503817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating dispensable content in the human interactome.
Ghadie M; Xia Y
Nat Commun; 2019 Jul; 10(1):3205. PubMed ID: 31324802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interactome mapping for analysis of complex phenotypes: insights from benchmarking binary interaction assays.
Braun P
Proteomics; 2012 May; 12(10):1499-518. PubMed ID: 22589225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. PRIN: a predicted rice interactome network.
Gu H; Zhu P; Jiao Y; Meng Y; Chen M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 May; 12():161. PubMed ID: 21575196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
