185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30333054)
1. ConFIRM trial - conversion of in vitro fertilization cycles to intrauterine inseminations in patients with a poor ovarian response to stimulation: a protocol for a multicentric, prospective randomized trial.
Delbos L; Parot-Schinkel E; El Hachem H; Legendre G; Descamps P; Boucret L; Ferré-L'Hotellier V; Jeanneteau P; Dreux C; Morinière C; May-Panloup P; Bouet PE
Trials; 2018 Oct; 19(1):565. PubMed ID: 30333054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [In vitro fertilization versus conversion to intrauterine insemination in patients with poor response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation].
Bouet PE; Legendre G; Delbos L; Dreux C; Jeanneteau P; Ferré-L'Hotellier V; Boucret L; Descamps P; May-Panloup P
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018 Feb; 46(2):118-123. PubMed ID: 29373313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is IVF-served two different ways-more cost-effective than IUI with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation?
Tjon-Kon-Fat RI; Bensdorp AJ; Bossuyt PM; Koks C; Oosterhuis GJ; Hoek A; Hompes P; Broekmans FJ; Verhoeve HR; de Bruin JP; van Golde R; Repping S; Cohlen BJ; Lambers MD; van Bommel PF; Slappendel E; Perquin D; Smeenk J; Pelinck MJ; Gianotten J; Hoozemans DA; Maas JW; Groen H; Eijkemans MJ; van der Veen F; Mol BW; van Wely M
Hum Reprod; 2015 Oct; 30(10):2331-9. PubMed ID: 26269539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro fertilization versus conversion to intrauterine insemination in Bologna-criteria poor responders: how to decide which option?
Quinquin M; Mialon O; Isnard V; Massin N; Parinaud J; Delotte J; Bongain A
Fertil Steril; 2014 Dec; 102(6):1596-601. PubMed ID: 25256936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The INeS study: prevention of multiple pregnancies: a randomised controlled trial comparing IUI COH versus IVF e SET versus MNC IVF in couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility.
Bensdorp AJ; Slappendel E; Koks C; Oosterhuis J; Hoek A; Hompes P; Broekmans F; Verhoeve H; de Bruin JP; van Weert JM; Traas M; Maas J; Beckers N; Repping S; Mol BW; van der Veen F; van Wely M
BMC Womens Health; 2009 Dec; 9():35. PubMed ID: 20021654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Conversion of in vitro fertilization cycles to intrauterine inseminations in patients with a poor ovarian response: Risk of multiple pregnancies.
Verhaeghe C; Abnoun S; May-Panloup P; Corroenne R; Legendre G; Descamps P; El Hachem H; Bouet PE
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2020 Oct; 49(8):101831. PubMed ID: 32535238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conversion to IUI versus continuance with IVF in low responder patients: A systematic review.
Fujii DT; Quesnell JL; Heitmann RJ
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Aug; 227():35-40. PubMed ID: 29885573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dropout rates in couples undergoing in vitro fertilization and intrauterine insemination.
Bensdorp AJ; Tjon-Kon-Fat R; Verhoeve H; Koks C; Hompes P; Hoek A; de Bruin JP; Cohlen B; Hoozemans D; Broekmans F; van Bomme P; Smeenk J; Mol BW; van der Veen F; van Wely M;
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():66-71. PubMed ID: 27567361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Couples with unexplained subfertility and unfavorable prognosis: a randomized pilot trial comparing the effectiveness of in vitro fertilization with elective single embryo transfer versus intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian stimulation.
Custers IM; König TE; Broekmans FJ; Hompes PG; Kaaijk E; Oosterhuis J; Mochtar MH; Repping S; van Wely M; Steures P; van der Veen F; Mol BW
Fertil Steril; 2011 Nov; 96(5):1107-11.e1. PubMed ID: 21890134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro fertilisation for unexplained subfertility.
Pandian Z; Bhattacharya S; Nikolaou D; Vale L; Templeton A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (2):CD003357. PubMed ID: 12076476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomised controlled trial of intra-uterine insemination versus in vitro fertilisation in patients with idiopathic or mild male infertility.
Elzeiny H; Garrett C; Toledo M; Stern K; McBain J; Baker HW
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Apr; 54(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 24579923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intrauterine insemination with gonadotropin stimulation or in vitro fertilization for the treatment of unexplained subfertility: a randomized controlled trial.
Nandi A; Bhide P; Hooper R; Gudi A; Shah A; Khan K; Homburg R
Fertil Steril; 2017 Jun; 107(6):1329-1335.e2. PubMed ID: 28501361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy and safety of follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa in ART: a randomized controlled trial in poor ovarian responders.
Humaidan P; Chin W; Rogoff D; D'Hooghe T; Longobardi S; Hubbard J; Schertz J;
Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):544-555. PubMed ID: 28137754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Results of in vitro fertilization versus intrauterine insemination in patients with low anti-Müllerian hormone levels. A single-center retrospective study of 639 + 119 cycles.
Sapet C; Gavoille A; Sesques A; Freour T; Subtil F; Salle B
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Mar; 50(3):101874. PubMed ID: 32687891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can we identify subfertile couples that benefit from immediate in vitro fertilisation over intrauterine insemination?
Tjon-Kon-Fat RI; Tajik P; Custers IM; Bossuyt PM; van der Veen F; van Wely M; Mol BW; Zafarmand MH
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jul; 202():36-40. PubMed ID: 27156154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. IVF with planned single-embryo transfer versus IUI with ovarian stimulation in couples with unexplained subfertility: an economic analysis.
van Rumste MM; Custers IM; van Wely M; Koks CA; van Weering HG; Beckers NG; Scheffer GJ; Broekmans FJ; Hompes PG; Mochtar MH; van der Veen F; Mol BW
Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Mar; 28(3):336-42. PubMed ID: 24456703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?
Drakopoulos P; Blockeel C; Stoop D; Camus M; de Vos M; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):370-6. PubMed ID: 26724797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modified natural cycle versus controlled ovarian hyperstimulation IVF: a cost-effectiveness evaluation of three simulated treatment scenarios.
Groen H; Tonch N; Simons AH; van der Veen F; Hoek A; Land JA
Hum Reprod; 2013 Dec; 28(12):3236-46. PubMed ID: 24166594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Low-dose human menopausal gonadotrophin versus clomiphene citrate in subfertile couples treated with intrauterine insemination: a randomized controlled trial.
Peeraer K; Debrock S; De Loecker P; Tomassetti C; Laenen A; Welkenhuysen M; Meeuwis L; Pelckmans S; Mol BW; Spiessens C; De Neubourg D; D'Hooghe TM
Hum Reprod; 2015 May; 30(5):1079-88. PubMed ID: 25788569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Timed intercourse versus intra-uterine insemination with or without ovarian hyperstimulation for subfertility in men.
Cohlen BJ; Vandekerckhove P; te Velde ER; Habbema JD
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD000360. PubMed ID: 10796711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
