These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
428 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30334077)
1. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart defects following homebirth and early discharge. Narayen IC; Te Pas AB; Blom NA; van den Akker-van Marle ME Eur J Pediatr; 2019 Jan; 178(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 30334077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pulse oximetry as a screening test for congenital heart defects in newborn infants: a test accuracy study with evaluation of acceptability and cost-effectiveness. Ewer AK; Furmston AT; Middleton LJ; Deeks JJ; Daniels JP; Pattison HM; Powell R; Roberts TE; Barton P; Auguste P; Bhoyar A; Thangaratinam S; Tonks AM; Satodia P; Deshpande S; Kumararatne B; Sivakumar S; Mupanemunda R; Khan KS Health Technol Assess; 2012; 16(2):v-xiii, 1-184. PubMed ID: 22284744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pulse oximetry as a screening test for congenital heart defects in newborn infants: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Roberts TE; Barton PM; Auguste PE; Middleton LJ; Furmston AT; Ewer AK Arch Dis Child; 2012 Mar; 97(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 22247242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maternal acceptability of pulse oximetry screening at home after home birth or very early discharge. Narayen IC; Kaptein AA; Hogewoning JA; Blom NA; Te Pas AB Eur J Pediatr; 2017 May; 176(5):669-672. PubMed ID: 28281093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of Pulse Oximetry Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Defects after Home Birth and Early Postnatal Discharge. Narayen IC; Blom NA; van Geloven N; Blankman EIM; van den Broek AJM; Bruijn M; Clur SB; van den Dungen FA; Havers HM; van Laerhoven H; Mir SE; Muller MA; Polak OM; Rammeloo LAJ; Ramnath G; van der Schoor SRD; van Kaam AH; Te Pas AB; J Pediatr; 2018 Jun; 197():29-35.e1. PubMed ID: 29580679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Newborn screening for congenital heart defects: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Knowles R; Griebsch I; Dezateux C; Brown J; Bull C; Wren C Health Technol Assess; 2005 Nov; 9(44):1-152, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16297355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A public health economic assessment of hospitals' cost to screen newborns for critical congenital heart disease. Peterson C; Grosse SD; Glidewell J; Garg LF; Van Naarden Braun K; Knapp MM; Beres LM; Hinton CF; Olney RS; Cassell CH Public Health Rep; 2014; 129(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 24381364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating cost and resource use associated with pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart disease: Empiric estimates and sources of variation. Reeder MR; Kim J; Nance A; Krikov S; Feldkamp ML; Randall H; Botto LD Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2015 Nov; 103(11):962-71. PubMed ID: 26215888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of routine screening for critical congenital heart disease in US newborns. Peterson C; Grosse SD; Oster ME; Olney RS; Cassell CH Pediatrics; 2013 Sep; 132(3):e595-603. PubMed ID: 23918890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness analysis of neonatal screening of critical congenital heart defects in China. Tobe RG; Martin GR; Li F; Moriichi A; Wu B; Mori R Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Nov; 96(46):e8683. PubMed ID: 29145300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pulse Oximetry Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease after Home Birth and Early Discharge. Narayen IC; Blom NA; Bourgonje MS; Haak MC; Smit M; Posthumus F; van den Broek AJ; Havers HM; te Pas AB J Pediatr; 2016 Mar; 170():188-92.e1. PubMed ID: 26746119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adapted protocol for pulse oximetry screening for congenital heart defects in a country with homebirths. Narayen IC; Blom NA; Verhart MS; Smit M; Posthumus F; van den Broek AJ; Havers H; Haak MC; te Pas AB Eur J Pediatr; 2015 Jan; 174(1):129-32. PubMed ID: 24990493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Critical congenital heart disease screening practices among licensed midwives in washington state. Evers PD; Vernon MM; Schultz AH J Midwifery Womens Health; 2015; 60(2):206-10. PubMed ID: 25782853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing the clinical and economic effects of clinical examination, pulse oximetry, and echocardiography in newborn screening for congenital heart defects: a probabilistic cost-effectiveness model and value of information analysis. Griebsch I; Knowles RL; Brown J; Bull C; Wren C; Dezateux CA Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2007; 23(2):192-204. PubMed ID: 17493305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Aspects of pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart defects: when, how and why? Narayen IC; Blom NA; Ewer AK; Vento M; Manzoni P; te Pas AB Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2016 Mar; 101(2):F162-7. PubMed ID: 26369369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feasibility of pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart defects in homebirths. Cawsey MJ; Noble S; Cross-Sudworth F; Ewer AK Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2016 Jul; 101(4):F349-51. PubMed ID: 26915671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neonatal pulse oximetry screening improves detecting of critical congenital heart disease. Ma XJ; Huang GY Chin Med J (Engl); 2013 Jul; 126(14):2736-40. PubMed ID: 23876906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Should postnatal oximetry screening be implemented nationwide in China? A cost-effectiveness analysis in three regions with different socioeconomic status. Tobe RG; Martin GR; Li F; Mori R Int J Cardiol; 2016 Feb; 204():45-7. PubMed ID: 26655534 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]