BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30334182)

  • 1. Predicting Fracture Risk in Younger Postmenopausal Women: Comparison of the Garvan and FRAX Risk Calculators in the Women's Health Initiative Study.
    Crandall CJ; Larson J; LaCroix A; Cauley JA; LeBoff MS; Li W; LeBlanc ES; Edwards BJ; Manson JE; Ensrud K
    J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Feb; 34(2):235-242. PubMed ID: 30334182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Race and Ethnicity and Fracture Prediction Among Younger Postmenopausal Women in the Women's Health Initiative Study.
    Crandall CJ; Larson JC; Schousboe JT; Manson JE; Watts NB; Robbins JA; Schnatz P; Nassir R; Shadyab AH; Johnson KC; Cauley JA; Ensrud KE
    JAMA Intern Med; 2023 Jul; 183(7):696-704. PubMed ID: 37213092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the FRAX and Garvan fracture risk calculators in older women.
    Bolland MJ; Siu AT; Mason BH; Horne AM; Ames RW; Grey AB; Gamble GD; Reid IR
    J Bone Miner Res; 2011 Feb; 26(2):420-7. PubMed ID: 20721930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How well do the FRAX (Australia) and Garvan calculators predict incident fractures? Data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.
    Holloway-Kew KL; Zhang Y; Betson AG; Anderson KB; Hans D; Hyde NK; Nicholson GC; Pocock NA; Kotowicz MA; Pasco JA
    Osteoporos Int; 2019 Oct; 30(10):2129-2139. PubMed ID: 31317250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture risk prediction in postmenopausal women from GO Study: the comparison between FRAX, Garvan, and POL-RISK algorithms.
    Pluskiewicz W; Werner A; Bach M; Adamczyk P; Drozdzowska B
    Arch Osteoporos; 2024 May; 19(1):39. PubMed ID: 38755326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of fracture risk prediction by the US Preventive Services Task Force strategy and two alternative strategies in women 50-64 years old in the Women's Health Initiative.
    Crandall CJ; Larson JC; Watts NB; Gourlay ML; Donaldson MG; LaCroix A; Cauley JA; Wactawski-Wende J; Gass ML; Robbins JA; Ensrud KE
    J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2014 Dec; 99(12):4514-22. PubMed ID: 25322268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. FRAX calculator and Garvan nomogram in male osteoporotic population.
    Pluskiewicz W; Adamczyk P; Franek E; Sewerynek E; Leszczynski P; Wichrowska H; Napiórkowska L; Stuss M; Ptaszek A; Kostyk T; Golba KS; Garbacz W; Drozdzowska B
    Aging Male; 2014 Sep; 17(3):174-82. PubMed ID: 24456527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increased cortical porosity and reduced cortical thickness of the proximal femur are associated with nonvertebral fracture independent of Fracture Risk Assessment Tool and Garvan estimates in postmenopausal women.
    Kral R; Osima M; Borgen TT; Vestgaard R; Richardsen E; Bjørnerem Å
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0185363. PubMed ID: 28945789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Setting the new FRAX reference threshold without bone mineral density in Chinese postmenopausal women.
    Liu S; Chen R; Ding N; Wang Q; Huang M; Liu H; Xie Z; Ou Y; Sheng Z
    J Endocrinol Invest; 2021 Feb; 44(2):347-352. PubMed ID: 32495298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. External validation and comparison of three prediction tools for risk of osteoporotic fractures using data from population based electronic health records: retrospective cohort study.
    Dagan N; Cohen-Stavi C; Leventer-Roberts M; Balicer RD
    BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6755. PubMed ID: 28104610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prognosis of fracture: evaluation of predictive accuracy of the FRAX algorithm and Garvan nomogram.
    Sandhu SK; Nguyen ND; Center JR; Pocock NA; Eisman JA; Nguyen TV
    Osteoporos Int; 2010 May; 21(5):863-71. PubMed ID: 19633880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the validity of osteoporosis and fracture risk assessment tools (IOF One Minute Test, SCORE, and FRAX) in postmenopausal Palestinian women.
    Kharroubi A; Saba E; Ghannam I; Darwish H
    Arch Osteoporos; 2017 Dec; 12(1):6. PubMed ID: 28013446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Serial Bone Density Measurement and Incident Fracture Risk Discrimination in Postmenopausal Women.
    Crandall CJ; Larson J; Wright NC; Laddu D; Stefanick ML; Kaunitz AM; Watts NB; Wactawski-Wende J; Womack CR; Johnson KC; Carbone LD; Jackson RD; Ensrud KE
    JAMA Intern Med; 2020 Sep; 180(9):1232-1240. PubMed ID: 32730575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rationale of the Spanish FRAX model in decision-making for predicting osteoporotic fractures: an update of FRIDEX cohort of Spanish women.
    Azagra R; Zwart M; Encabo G; Aguyé A; Martin-Sánchez JC; Puchol-Ruiz N; Gabriel-Escoda P; Ortiz-Alinque S; Gené E; Iglesias M; Moriña D; Diaz-Herrera MA; Utzet M; Manresa JM;
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jun; 17():262. PubMed ID: 27317560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The utility of absolute risk prediction using FRAX® and Garvan Fracture Risk Calculator in daily practice.
    van Geel TA; Eisman JA; Geusens PP; van den Bergh JP; Center JR; Dinant GJ
    Maturitas; 2014 Feb; 77(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 24287178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Five-year fracture risk assessment in postmenopausal women, using both the POL-RISK calculator and the Garvan nomogram: the Silesia Osteo Active Study.
    Zagórski P; Tabor E; Martela-Tomaszek K; Adamczyk P; Pluskiewicz W
    Arch Osteoporos; 2021 Feb; 16(1):32. PubMed ID: 33594643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. FRAX® tool, the WHO algorithm to predict osteoporotic fractures: the first analysis of its discriminative and predictive ability in the Spanish FRIDEX cohort.
    Azagra R; Roca G; Encabo G; Aguyé A; Zwart M; Güell S; Puchol N; Gene E; Casado E; Sancho P; Solà S; Torán P; Iglesias M; Gisbert MC; López-Expósito F; Pujol-Salud J; Fernandez-Hermida Y; Puente A; Rosàs M; Bou V; Antón JJ; Lansdberg G; Martín-Sánchez JC; Díez-Pérez A; Prieto-Alhambra D
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2012 Oct; 13():204. PubMed ID: 23088223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reasons for discrepancies in hip fracture risk estimates using FRAX and Garvan calculators.
    Billington EO; Gamble GD; Reid IR
    Maturitas; 2016 Mar; 85():11-8. PubMed ID: 26857874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sarcopenia combined with FRAX probabilities improves fracture risk prediction in older Chinese men.
    Yu R; Leung J; Woo J
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2014 Dec; 15(12):918-23. PubMed ID: 25262197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research Task Force on clinical algorithms for fracture risk report.
    Burnett-Bowie SM; Wright NC; Yu EW; Langsetmo L; Yearwood GMH; Crandall CJ; Leslie WD; Cauley JA
    J Bone Miner Res; 2024 May; 39(5):517-530. PubMed ID: 38590141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.