308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30334871)
1. Bioactive Glass Granules Inhibit Mature Bacterial Biofilms on the Surfaces of Cochlear Implants.
Höing B; Kirchhoff L; Arnolds J; Hussain T; Buer J; Lang S; Arweiler-Harbeck D; Steinmann J
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Dec; 39(10):e985-e991. PubMed ID: 30334871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Imaging studies of bacterial biofilms on cochlear implants-Bioactive glass (BAG) inhibits mature biofilm.
Kirchhoff L; Arweiler-Harbeck D; Arnolds J; Hussain T; Hansen S; Bertram R; Buer J; Lang S; Steinmann J; Höing B
PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0229198. PubMed ID: 32084198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of S53P4 bone substitute on staphylococcal adhesion and biofilm formation on other implant materials in normal and hypoxic conditions.
Pérez-Tanoira R; García-Pedrazuela M; Hyyrynen T; Soininen A; Aarnisalo A; Nieminen MT; Tiainen VM; Konttinen YT; Kinnari TJ
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2015 Sep; 26(9):239. PubMed ID: 26403279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of antibacterial bioactive glass S53P4 against S. aureus biofilms grown on titanium discs in vitro.
Coraça-Huber DC; Fille M; Hausdorfer J; Putzer D; Nogler M
J Orthop Res; 2014 Jan; 32(1):175-7. PubMed ID: 24108602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Zirconium Nitride Coating Reduced Staphylococcus epidermidis Biofilm Formation on Orthopaedic Implant Surfaces: An In Vitro Study.
Pilz M; Staats K; Tobudic S; Assadian O; Presterl E; Windhager R; Holinka J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Feb; 477(2):461-466. PubMed ID: 30418277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro antibiofilm activity of bioactive glass S53P4.
Drago L; Vassena C; Fenu S; De Vecchi E; Signori V; De Francesco R; Romanò CL
Future Microbiol; 2014; 9(5):593-601. PubMed ID: 24957087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can Near-infrared Spectroscopy Detect and Differentiate Implant-associated Biofilms?
Tidwell JE; Dawson-Andoh B; Adedipe EO; Nkansah K; Dietz MJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3638-46. PubMed ID: 26265208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biofilm-forming capacity of Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from ocular infections.
Hou W; Sun X; Wang Z; Zhang Y
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Aug; 53(9):5624-31. PubMed ID: 22736609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bacterial biofilm formation on a human cochlear implant.
Pawlowski KS; Wawro D; Roland PS
Otol Neurotol; 2005 Sep; 26(5):972-5. PubMed ID: 16151345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ability of adhesion and biofilm formation of pathogens of periprosthetic joint infections on titanium-niobium nitride (TiNbN) ceramic coatings.
Bidossi A; Bottagisio M; De Grandi R; De Vecchi E
J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Mar; 15(1):90. PubMed ID: 32131862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomaterials for orthopedics: anti-biofilm activity of a new bioactive glass coating on titanium implants.
Marques DM; Oliveira VC; Souza MT; Zanotto ED; Issa JPM; Watanabe E
Biofouling; 2020 Feb; 36(2):234-244. PubMed ID: 32321306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does Extracellular DNA Production Vary in Staphylococcal Biofilms Isolated From Infected Implants versus Controls?
Zatorska B; Groger M; Moser D; Diab-Elschahawi M; Lusignani LS; Presterl E
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Aug; 475(8):2105-2113. PubMed ID: 28194715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bacterial biofilms may contribute to persistent cochlear implant infection.
Antonelli PJ; Lee JC; Burne RA
Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):953-7. PubMed ID: 15547425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation on an explanted cochlear implant demonstrated using an ultrasonication technique.
Fishpool SJ; Osborne JE; Looker N
Cochlear Implants Int; 2012 Aug; 13(3):181-3. PubMed ID: 22333040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of Chitosan-Based Surfaces to Prevent Single- and Dual-Species Biofilms of
Lima M; Teixeira-Santos R; Gomes LC; Faria SI; Valcarcel J; Vázquez JA; Cerqueira MA; Pastrana L; Bourbon AI; Mergulhão FJ
Molecules; 2021 Jul; 26(14):. PubMed ID: 34299652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of sonication with chemical biofilm dislodgement methods using chelating and reducing agents: Implications for the microbiological diagnosis of implant associated infection.
Karbysheva S; Di Luca M; Butini ME; Winkler T; Schütz M; Trampuz A
PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231389. PubMed ID: 32267888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Antibiofilm agents against MDR bacterial strains: is bioactive glass BAG-S53P4 also effective?
Bortolin M; De Vecchi E; Romanò CL; Toscano M; Mattina R; Drago L
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2016 Jan; 71(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 26462989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of Staphylococci causing breast peri-implant infections in oncologic patients.
Barbieri R; Pesce M; Franchelli S; Baldelli I; De Maria A; Marchese A
BMC Microbiol; 2015 Feb; 15(1):26. PubMed ID: 25888077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of contact lens multipurpose solutions on bacterial biofilm development.
Artini M; Cellini A; Scoarughi GL; Papa R; Tilotta M; Palma S; Selan L
Eye Contact Lens; 2015 May; 41(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 25828515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reduction in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus biofilms from implant materials in a diffusion dominated environment.
Moley JP; McGrath MS; Granger JF; Stoodley P; Dusane DH
J Orthop Res; 2018 Nov; 36(11):3081-3085. PubMed ID: 29924414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
