These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30336584)

  • 21. [European ethics committees in transition: challenges of new requirements].
    Lanzerath D
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2019 Jun; 62(6):697-705. PubMed ID: 31069417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. EUPATI and Patients in Medicines Research and Development: Guidance for Patient Involvement in Ethical Review of Clinical Trials.
    Klingmann I; Heckenberg A; Warner K; Haerry D; Hunter A; May M; See W
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2018; 5():251. PubMed ID: 30246010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Are hospital ethics committees really necessary?
    Hipps RS
    J Med Humanit; 1992; 13(3):163-75. PubMed ID: 11645820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The ethics committee in the nursing home. Results of a national survey.
    Glasser G; Zweibel NR; Cassel CK
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1988 Feb; 36(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 3339220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Data and tissue research without patient consent: A qualitative study of the views of research ethics committees in New Zealand.
    Ballantyne A; Moore A
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(3):143-153. PubMed ID: 30407144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ethics on the floor.
    Wilkes L
    Collegian; 2003 Apr; 10(2):34-9. PubMed ID: 15470988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Introducing ethical evaluation of the use of animals in experiments in the Near East.
    Izmirli S; Aldavood SJ; Yasar A; Phillips CJ
    Altern Lab Anim; 2010 Aug; 38(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 20822325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Nurses' views on ethical codes: a focus group study.
    Verpeet E; Dierckx de Casterle B; Van der Arend A; Gastmans CA
    J Adv Nurs; 2005 Jul; 51(2):188-95. PubMed ID: 15963191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ethical consideration of the research proposal and the informed-consent process: An online survey of researchers and ethics committee members in Thailand.
    Kaewkungwal J; Adams P
    Account Res; 2019 Apr; 26(3):176-197. PubMed ID: 30987450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Derailing the trolley: Everyday utilitarian judgments in groups high versus low in psychopathic traits or autistic traits.
    Vyas K; Jameel L; Bellesi G; Crawford S; Channon S
    Psychiatry Res; 2017 Apr; 250():84-91. PubMed ID: 28152398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Institutional ethics committees: what, how, and why.
    Drane JF; Roth RB
    Health Prog; 1985 Oct; 66(8):30-4, 56. PubMed ID: 10274195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Nurse participation in ethical decision making in the clinical setting.
    Dalby J
    AWHONNS Clin Issues Perinat Womens Health Nurs; 1993; 4(4):606-10. PubMed ID: 8220375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Harm-benefit analysis - what is the added value? A review of alternative strategies for weighing harms and benefits as part of the assessment of animal research.
    Grimm H; Olsson IAS; Sandøe P
    Lab Anim; 2019 Feb; 53(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 29966482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Differences between research ethics committees.
    Edwards SJ; Stone T; Swift T
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2007; 23(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 17234012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Trials, Regulation and tribulations.
    Petrini C; Garattini S
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2016 Apr; 72(4):503-5. PubMed ID: 26794920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assigning ethical weights to clinical signs observed during toxicity testing.
    Ringblom J; Törnqvist E; Hansson SO; Rudén C; Öberg M
    ALTEX; 2017; 34(1):148-156. PubMed ID: 27442998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The place for emotions in professional carers' thinking: reflections on two cases.
    Koren E
    Med Law; 2010 Dec; 29(4):537-46. PubMed ID: 22145549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An overview of ethical review committees in Japan: examining the certification applications of ethical review committees.
    Iijima Y; Ogasawara K; Toda S; Takano T
    Nagoya J Med Sci; 2019 Aug; 81(3):501-509. PubMed ID: 31579340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of Viewpoints of Health Care Professionals on the Role of Ethics Committees and Hospitals in the Resolution of Clinical Ethical Dilemmas Based on Practice Environment.
    Marcus BS; Carlson JN; Hegde GG; Shang J; Venkat A
    HEC Forum; 2016 Mar; 28(1):35-52. PubMed ID: 25519957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Critical Analysis of Assessment Studies of the Animal Ethics Review Process.
    Varga O
    Animals (Basel); 2013 Sep; 3(3):907-22. PubMed ID: 26479540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.