283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30336788)
1. Muller's nobel prize research and peer review.
Calabrese EJ
Philos Ethics Humanit Med; 2018 Oct; 13(1):15. PubMed ID: 30336788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Was Muller's 1946 Nobel Prize research for radiation-induced gene mutations peer-reviewed?
Calabrese EJ
Philos Ethics Humanit Med; 2018 Jun; 13(1):6. PubMed ID: 29875023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Muller's Nobel Prize Lecture: when ideology prevailed over science.
Calabrese EJ
Toxicol Sci; 2012 Mar; 126(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 22166484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Muller and mutations: mouse study of George Snell (a postdoc of Muller) fails to confirm Muller's fruit fly findings, and Muller fails to cite Snell's findings.
Calabrese EJ; Selby PB
Arch Toxicol; 2024 Jun; 98(6):1953-1963. PubMed ID: 38573337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How did Hermann Muller publish a paper absent any data in the journal Science? Ethical questions and implications of Muller's Nobel Prize.
Calabrese EJ; Giordano J
Chem Biol Interact; 2022 Dec; 368():110204. PubMed ID: 36216107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Flaws in the LNT single-hit model for cancer risk: An historical assessment.
Calabrese EJ
Environ Res; 2017 Oct; 158():773-788. PubMed ID: 28756009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Confirmation that Hermann Muller was dishonest in his Nobel Prize Lecture.
Calabrese EJ
Arch Toxicol; 2023 Nov; 97(11):2999-3003. PubMed ID: 37665363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Muller's Nobel lecture on dose-response for ionizing radiation: ideology or science?
Calabrese EJ
Arch Toxicol; 2011 Dec; 85(12):1495-8. PubMed ID: 21717110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Newly discovered letter: why Muller failed to cite the negative mouse mutation findings of Snell, preserving his chances to receive the Nobel Prize.
Calabrese EJ; Selby PB
Arch Toxicol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38909170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Muller's Nobel Prize data: Getting the dose wrong and its significance.
Calabrese EJ
Environ Res; 2019 Sep; 176():108528. PubMed ID: 31228809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Thresholds for radiation induced mutation? The Muller-Evans debate: A turning point for cancer risk assessment.
Calabrese EJ
Chem Biol Interact; 2023 Sep; 382():110614. PubMed ID: 37356557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. H.J. Muller's contributions to mutation research.
Carlson EA
Mutat Res; 2013; 752(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 22948037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Key historical study findings questioned in debate over threshold versus linear non-threshold for cancer risk assessment.
Calabrese EJ
Chem Biol Interact; 2022 May; 359():109917. PubMed ID: 35378082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Technology in scientific practice: how H. J. Muller used the fruit fly to investigate the X-ray machine.
Komel S
Hist Philos Life Sci; 2023 Jun; 45(2):22. PubMed ID: 37266758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Nobel chronicles. 1946: Hermann Joseph Muller (1890-1967).
Raju TN
Lancet; 1999 Mar; 353(9157):1023. PubMed ID: 10459949
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Hermann Muller--Nobel Prize for contributions to genetics.
Shampo MA; Kyle RA
Mayo Clin Proc; 1999 Mar; 74(3):242. PubMed ID: 10089992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Notes on the legacy of the Röntgen rays.
Rosenow UF
Med Phys; 1995 Nov; 22(11 Pt 2):1855-67. PubMed ID: 8587539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is the Nobel Prize good for science?
Casadevall A; Fang FC
FASEB J; 2013 Dec; 27(12):4682-90. PubMed ID: 24008752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Otorhinolaryngologists nominated for the Nobel Prize 1901-1940.
Hansson N; Drobietz M; Mudry A
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Apr; 277(4):1255-1258. PubMed ID: 32036407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The 2009 Lindau Nobel Laureate meeting: Martin Chalfie, Chemistry 2008.
Chalfie M
J Vis Exp; 2010 Feb; (36):. PubMed ID: 20147885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
