These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30336815)

  • 1. Predicting Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Relative Change in Fractional Flow Reserve.
    Kobayashi Y; Fearon WF
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Oct; 11(20):2110-2112. PubMed ID: 30336815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Three-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 2 Trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation).
    Fearon WF; Nishi T; De Bruyne B; Boothroyd DB; Barbato E; Tonino P; Jüni P; Pijls NHJ; Hlatky MA;
    Circulation; 2018 Jan; 137(5):480-487. PubMed ID: 29097450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Physiology: Is Hyperemia Necessary?
    Jeremias A; Stone GW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Aug; 13(16):1934-1936. PubMed ID: 32819482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study.
    Pijls NH; Fearon WF; Tonino PA; Siebert U; Ikeno F; Bornschein B; van't Veer M; Klauss V; Manoharan G; Engstrøm T; Oldroyd KG; Ver Lee PN; MacCarthy PA; De Bruyne B;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2010 Jul; 56(3):177-84. PubMed ID: 20537493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A novel noninvasive technology for treatment planning using virtual coronary stenting and computed tomography-derived computed fractional flow reserve.
    Kim KH; Doh JH; Koo BK; Min JK; Erglis A; Yang HM; Park KW; Lee HY; Kang HJ; Kim YJ; Lee SY; Kim HS
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 7(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 24332418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of Serial Coronary Stenoses With Noninvasive Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve and Treatment Planning Using a Novel Virtual Stenting Application.
    Ihdayhid AR; White A; Ko B
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Dec; 10(24):e223-e225. PubMed ID: 29153499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Complete Revascularization Improves the Prognosis in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Severe Nonculprit Disease: A DANAMI 3-PRIMULTI Substudy (Primary PCI in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: Treatment of Culprit Lesion Only or Complete Revascularization).
    Lønborg J; Engstrøm T; Kelbæk H; Helqvist S; Kløvgaard L; Holmvang L; Pedersen F; Jørgensen E; Saunamäki K; Clemmensen P; De Backer O; Ravkilde J; Tilsted HH; Villadsen AB; Aarøe J; Jensen SE; Raungaard B; Køber L; Høfsten DE;
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Apr; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 28404623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inverse prognostic value of post-percutaneous coronary intervention fractional flow reserve in patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.
    Nadir MA
    Heart; 2017 Apr; 103(7):564. PubMed ID: 28289102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling Fractional Flow Reserve: Developing an Estimate of a Better Mousetrap.
    Hachamovitch R
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jun; 11(6):e007939. PubMed ID: 29895716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of age on fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) trial substudy.
    Lim HS; Tonino PA; De Bruyne B; Yong AS; Lee BK; Pijls NH; Fearon WF
    Int J Cardiol; 2014 Nov; 177(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 25499342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why Is Fractional Flow Reserve After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Not Always 1.0?
    Tonino PA; Johnson NP
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 May; 9(10):1032-5. PubMed ID: 27198683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve of Value in Chronic Total Occlusions?
    Tremmel JA; Fearon WF
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Nov; 11(11):e007360. PubMed ID: 30571221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcome impact of coronary revascularization strategy reclassification with fractional flow reserve at time of diagnostic angiography: insights from a large French multicenter fractional flow reserve registry.
    Van Belle E; Rioufol G; Pouillot C; Cuisset T; Bougrini K; Teiger E; Champagne S; Belle L; Barreau D; Hanssen M; Besnard C; Dauphin R; Dallongeville J; El Hahi Y; Sideris G; Bretelle C; Lhoest N; Barnay P; Leborgne L; Dupouy P;
    Circulation; 2014 Jan; 129(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 24255062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Explanation of Postprocedural Fractional Flow Reserve Below 0.85.
    van Zandvoort LJC; Masdjedi K; Witberg K; Ligthart J; Tovar Forero MN; Diletti R; Lemmert ME; Wilschut J; de Jaegere PPT; Boersma E; Zijlstra F; Van Mieghem NM; Daemen J
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Feb; 12(2):e007030. PubMed ID: 30732469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nonhyperemic Coronary Pressure Ratios to Assess Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Fearon WF
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Oct; 12(20):2015-2017. PubMed ID: 31648763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fractional Flow Reserve and Quality-of-Life Improvement After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease.
    Nishi T; Piroth Z; De Bruyne B; Jagic N; Möbius-Winkler S; Kobayashi Y; Derimay F; Fournier S; Barbato E; Tonino P; Jüni P; Pijls NHJ; Fearon WF
    Circulation; 2018 Oct; 138(17):1797-1804. PubMed ID: 30354650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time to Consider Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Distal Left Main Bifurcation.
    Boukhris M; Mansour S
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Aug; 12(16):1625. PubMed ID: 31439342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Stent Expansion Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound: The ILUMIEN II Study (Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography [OCT] in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR] and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
    Maehara A; Ben-Yehuda O; Ali Z; Wijns W; Bezerra HG; Shite J; Généreux P; Nichols M; Jenkins P; Witzenbichler B; Mintz GS; Stone GW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 8(13):1704-14. PubMed ID: 26585621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reply: Time to Consider Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Distal Left Main Bifurcation.
    Lee CH; Nam CW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Aug; 12(16):1626. PubMed ID: 31439343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting Physiological Success of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Pull Back and Pull Out?
    Völz S; Omerovic E
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Nov; 13(22):2685-2687. PubMed ID: 33069651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.