These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30336820)
1. Being a Great Reviewer: Remembering the "Why". Moliterno DJ JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Oct; 11(20):2130-2131. PubMed ID: 30336820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. How to review a paper for Heart. Otto CM Heart; 2015 Jan; 101(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 25502328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Update on the Manuscript Peer Review Process. Elmore SA Toxicol Pathol; 2017 Dec; 45(8):1028-1031. PubMed ID: 29145784 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. What happens to your submission at Australasian Journal on Ageing? Parkinson L; Sims J Australas J Ageing; 2017 Jun; 36(2):87-88. PubMed ID: 28635096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. So you want to publish your research in the Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis? Greaves M J Thromb Haemost; 2017 Mar; 15(3):405-410. PubMed ID: 27966273 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Peer Review in Transplantation. Hutchinson JA Transplantation; 2015 Sep; 99(9):1746-8. PubMed ID: 26308410 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. What Makes a Medical Journal Successful? Five Crucial Components. Fred HL Tex Heart Inst J; 2017 Apr; 44(2):91-93. PubMed ID: 28461791 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Fortifying the external peer review: an editorial perspective. Sohail S J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Jan; 25(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 25604359 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. European Urology: serving our readership through systematic peer review, use of reporting standards, and encouragement of postpublication review. Catto JW; Cooperberg MR; Cornu JN; Gratzke C; Novara G; Shariat SF; Vickers A Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):188-90. PubMed ID: 25175422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Preprints and Cardiovascular Science: Prescient or Premature? Nallamothu BK; Hill JA Circulation; 2017 Sep; 136(13):1177-1179. PubMed ID: 28912371 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality and peer review of research: an adjudicating role for editors. Newton DP Account Res; 2010 May; 17(3):130-45. PubMed ID: 20461569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Your role and responsibilities in the manuscript peer review process. Brazeau GA; Dipiro JT; Fincham JE; Boucher BA; Tracy TS Am J Pharm Educ; 2008 Jun; 72(3):69. PubMed ID: 18698392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Editorial: CORR's New Peer-Reviewer Tool-Useful for More Than Peer Reviews. Leopold SS Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2321-2322. PubMed ID: 27577066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Investigation of scientific fraud. Statements from the Swedish Research Council not sufficiently normative]. Werkö L Lakartidningen; 2006 Oct 25-31; 103(43):3288-91. PubMed ID: 17117661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Taking a peek into the editor's office. Nat Cell Biol; 2018 Oct; 20(10):1101. PubMed ID: 30258125 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Scientific reporting guidelines]. Nylenna M Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Nov; 129(22):2340. PubMed ID: 19935931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The importance of no evidence. Nat Hum Behav; 2019 Mar; 3(3):197. PubMed ID: 30953022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Checklists and Nallamothu BK Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2018 Jan; 11(1):e004517. PubMed ID: 29330142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]