These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30337118)

  • 1. Needed: consensus and classification for terms used in cognitive, forensic and clinical bias discussions.
    Satya-Murti S; Lockhart JJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Dec; 293():e10-e11. PubMed ID: 30337118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnosing Crime and Diagnosing Disease: Bias Reduction Strategies in the Forensic and Clinical Sciences.
    Lockhart JJ; Satya-Murti S
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Nov; 62(6):1534-1541. PubMed ID: 28230894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Blinding or information control in diagnosis: could it reduce errors in clinical decision-making?
    Lockhart JJ; Satya-Murti S
    Diagnosis (Berl); 2018 Nov; 5(4):179-189. PubMed ID: 30231010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A risk-based approach to cognitive bias in forensic science.
    Camilleri A; Abarno D; Bird C; Coxon A; Mitchell N; Redman K; Sly N; Wills S; Silenieks E; Simpson E; Lindsay H
    Sci Justice; 2019 Sep; 59(5):533-543. PubMed ID: 31472798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cognitive bias research in forensic science: A systematic review.
    Cooper GS; Meterko V
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():35-46. PubMed ID: 30769302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnosing Crime and Diagnosing Disease-II: Visual Pattern Perception and Diagnostic Accuracy.
    Satya-Murti S; Lockhart JJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Sep; 63(5):1429-1434. PubMed ID: 29341129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Problems with terminology in forensic science, medicine, and law].
    Mazak-Lucyk Z; Lucyk W
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2005; 55(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 15984116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing Cognitive Bias in Forensic Decisions: A Review and Outlook.
    Curley LJ; Munro J; Lages M; MacLean R; Murray J
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):354-360. PubMed ID: 31693180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. National Academy of Sciences "standardization": on what terms?
    Bunch AW
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(4):1041-5. PubMed ID: 24854677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Thinking forensics: Cognitive science for forensic practitioners.
    Edmond G; Towler A; Growns B; Ribeiro G; Found B; White D; Ballantyne K; Searston RA; Thompson MB; Tangen JM; Kemp RI; Martire K
    Sci Justice; 2017 Mar; 57(2):144-154. PubMed ID: 28284440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biasability and reliability of expert forensic document examiners.
    Dror IE; Scherr KC; Mohammed LA; MacLean CL; Cunningham L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jan; 318():110610. PubMed ID: 33358191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What do forensic analysts consider relevant to their decision making?
    Gardner BO; Kelley S; Murrie DC; Dror IE
    Sci Justice; 2019 Sep; 59(5):516-523. PubMed ID: 31472796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What soda challenges and tennis balls can teach us about cognitive bias.
    Delger D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jan; 294():e23-e24. PubMed ID: 30529055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A perspective on errors, bias, and interpretation in the forensic sciences and direction for continuing advancement.
    Budowle B; Bottrell MC; Bunch SG; Fram R; Harrison D; Meagher S; Oien CT; Peterson PE; Seiger DP; Smith MB; Smrz MA; Soltis GL; Stacey RB
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Jul; 54(4):798-809. PubMed ID: 19486241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A global survey of the attitudes and perspectives of cognitive bias in forensic anthropology.
    Leung KN; Nakhaeizadeh S; Morgan RM
    Sci Justice; 2024 Jul; 64(4):347-359. PubMed ID: 39025560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contextual bias on decision-making in forensic toxicology: First survey from China.
    He N; Wang L; Hao H
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Apr; 333():111232. PubMed ID: 35176676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Strengthening forensic DNA decision making through a better understanding of the influence of cognitive bias.
    Jeanguenat AM; Budowle B; Dror IE
    Sci Justice; 2017 Nov; 57(6):415-420. PubMed ID: 29173454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The most consistent finding in forensic science is inconsistency.
    Dror IE
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 Nov; 68(6):1851-1855. PubMed ID: 37658789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptions and estimates of error rates in forensic science: A survey of forensic analysts.
    Murrie DC; Gardner BO; Kelley S; Dror IE
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Sep; 302():109887. PubMed ID: 31404811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimising bias in the forensic evaluation of suspicious paediatric injury.
    Skellern C
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2015 Aug; 34():11-6. PubMed ID: 26165652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.