These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30338552)

  • 1. Risk assessment and juvenile resentencing: A critical analysis.
    Arnold S; Flack D; Heilbrun K
    Behav Sci Law; 2018 Sep; 36(5):576-586. PubMed ID: 30338552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Life-sentenced juveniles: Public perceptions of risk and need for incarceration.
    Heilbrun K; Durham K; Thornewill A; Schiedel R; Pietruszka V; Phillips S; Locklair B; Thomas J
    Behav Sci Law; 2018 Sep; 36(5):587-596. PubMed ID: 30298613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Depravity Standard and individualized assessment: A case study modality for Miller resentencing cases.
    Welner M; DeLisi M
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2022 Aug; 90():102375. PubMed ID: 35679767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Juvenile homicide offenders: A 35-year-follow-up study.
    Heide KM
    Behav Sci Law; 2019 Sep; 37(5):493-511. PubMed ID: 31441109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Term-of-Years Sentences Since
    Piel JL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2020 Mar; 48(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 31980456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Life after life: Recidivism among individuals formerly sentenced to mandatory juvenile life without parole.
    Sbeglia C; Simmons C; Icenogle G; Levick M; Peniche M; Beardslee J; Cauffman E
    J Res Adolesc; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38845089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences between juvenile offenders with and without intellectual disabilities in the importance of static and dynamic risk factors for recidivism.
    van der Put CE; Asscher JJ; Stams GJ; Moonen XM
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2014 Nov; 58(11):992-1003. PubMed ID: 23919502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Eliminating the Competency Presumption in Juvenile Delinquency Cases.
    Katner DR
    Cornell J Law Public Policy; 2015; 24(3):403-50. PubMed ID: 26809160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Juvenile Homicide Offenders Look Back 35 Years Later: Reasons They Were Involved in Murder.
    Heide KM
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jun; 17(11):. PubMed ID: 32498292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differences in the prevalence and impact of risk factors for general recidivism between different types of juveniles who have committed sexual offenses (JSOs) and juveniles who have committed nonsexual offenses (NSOs).
    van der Put CE; van Vugt ES; Stams GJ; Deković M; van der Laan PH
    Sex Abuse; 2013 Feb; 25(1):41-68. PubMed ID: 22786727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Algorithmic risk assessments and the double-edged sword of youth.
    Stevenson MT; Slobogin C
    Behav Sci Law; 2018 Sep; 36(5):638-656. PubMed ID: 30451322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The supreme court and the sentencing of juveniles in the United States: reaffirming the distinctiveness of youth.
    Siegel DM
    Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am; 2011 Jul; 20(3):431-45. PubMed ID: 21683911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Impact of Using Documented but Uncharged Offense Data on JSORRAT-II Predictive Validity.
    Ralston CA; Sarkar A; Philipp GT; Epperson DL
    Sex Abuse; 2017 Mar; 29(2):186-202. PubMed ID: 25896905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attitudes regarding life sentences for juvenile offenders.
    Greene E; Evelo AJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2013 Aug; 37(4):276-89. PubMed ID: 23646918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Juvenile life without parole: updates on legislative and judicial trends and on facilitating fair sentencing.
    Bath E; Pope K; Ijadi-Maghsoodi R; Thomas C
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2015 May; 54(5):343-7. PubMed ID: 25901768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of neuroscience on US Supreme Court decisions about adolescents' criminal culpability.
    Steinberg L
    Nat Rev Neurosci; 2013 Jul; 14(7):513-8. PubMed ID: 23756633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Back on the streets: Maturation and risk factors for recidivism among serious juvenile offenders.
    Leverso J; Bielby W; Hoelter LF
    J Adolesc; 2015 Jun; 41():67-75. PubMed ID: 25828549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk and protective factors for recidivism among juveniles who have offended sexually.
    Spice A; Viljoen JL; Latzman NE; Scalora MJ; Ullman D
    Sex Abuse; 2013 Aug; 25(4):347-69. PubMed ID: 23033066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Law & psychiatry: punishing juveniles who kill.
    Appelbaum PS
    Psychiatr Serv; 2012 Oct; 63(10):956-8. PubMed ID: 23032673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Jury of Their Peers: A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Teen Court on Criminal Recidivism.
    Bouchard J; Wong JS
    J Youth Adolesc; 2017 Jul; 46(7):1472-1487. PubMed ID: 28365901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.