These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30340572)

  • 1. The effect of surgery report cards on improving radical prostatectomy quality: the SuRep study protocol.
    Breau RH; Kumar RM; Lavallee LT; Cagiannos I; Morash C; Horrigan M; Cnossen S; Mallick R; Stacey D; Fung-Kee-Fung M; Morash R; Smylie J; Witiuk K; Fergusson DA
    BMC Urol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):89. PubMed ID: 30340572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance Feedback May Not Improve Radical Prostatectomy Outcomes: The Surgical Report Card (SuRep) Study.
    Kumar RM; Fergusson DA; Lavallée LT; Cagiannos I; Morash C; Horrigan M; Mallick R; Stacey D; Fung-Kee-Fung M; Sands D; Breau RH
    J Urol; 2021 Aug; 206(2):346-353. PubMed ID: 33818139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implementation of a Surgeon-Level Comparative Quality Performance Review to Improve Positive Surgical Margin Rates during Radical Prostatectomy.
    Matulewicz RS; Tosoian JJ; Stimson CJ; Ross AE; Chappidi M; Lotan TL; Humphreys E; Partin AW; Schaeffer EM
    J Urol; 2017 May; 197(5):1245-1250. PubMed ID: 27916711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are you now a good surgeon? T2 positive margin status as a quality outcome measure following radical prostatectomy.
    Damani A; Van Hemelrijck M; Wulaningsih W; Crawley D; Cahill D
    World J Urol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 27112152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Achieving Quality Assurance of Prostate Cancer Surgery During Reorganisation of Cancer Services.
    Cathcart P; Sridhara A; Ramachandran N; Briggs T; Nathan S; Kelly J
    Eur Urol; 2015 Jul; 68(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 25770482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. UK radical prostatectomy outcomes and surgeon case volume: based on an analysis of the British Association of Urological Surgeons Complex Operations Database.
    Vesey SG; McCabe JE; Hounsome L; Fowler S
    BJU Int; 2012 Feb; 109(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 21771246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the Quality of Surgical Care for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Results from the CEASAR Study.
    Reisz PA; Laviana AA; Zhao Z; Huang LC; Koyama T; Conwill R; Hoffman K; Goodman M; Hamilton AS; Wu XC; Paddock LE; Stroup A; Cooperberg MR; Hashibe M; O'Neil BB; Kaplan SH; Greenfield S; Penson DF; Barocas DA
    J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1236-1241. PubMed ID: 32568605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study.
    Yaxley JW; Coughlin GD; Chambers SK; Occhipinti S; Samaratunga H; Zajdlewicz L; Dunglison N; Carter R; Williams S; Payton DJ; Perry-Keene J; Lavin MF; Gardiner RA
    Lancet; 2016 Sep; 388(10049):1057-1066. PubMed ID: 27474375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of Patient- and Surgeon-Specific Variations in Patient-Reported Urinary Outcomes 3 Months After Radical Prostatectomy From a Statewide Improvement Collaborative.
    Auffenberg GB; Qi J; Dunn RL; Linsell S; Kim T; Miller DC; Tosoian J; Sarle R; Johnston WK; Kleer E; Ghani KR; Montie J; Peabody J
    JAMA Surg; 2021 Mar; 156(3):e206359. PubMed ID: 33471043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient- and Surgeon-Level Variation in Patient-Reported Sexual Function Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy Over 2 Years: Results From a Statewide Surgical Improvement Collaborative.
    Agochukwu-Mmonu N; Qi J; Dunn RL; Montie J; Wittmann D; Miller D; Martin R; Kim T; Johnston WK; Peabody J
    JAMA Surg; 2022 Feb; 157(2):136-144. PubMed ID: 34851369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of oncological and health-related quality of life outcomes between open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer - findings from the population-based Victorian Prostate Cancer Registry.
    Ong WL; Evans SM; Spelman T; Kearns PA; Murphy DG; Millar JL
    BJU Int; 2016 Oct; 118(4):563-9. PubMed ID: 26573954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cancer control and functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy as markers of surgical quality: analysis of heterogeneity between surgeons at a single cancer center.
    Vickers A; Savage C; Bianco F; Mulhall J; Sandhu J; Guillonneau B; Cronin A; Scardino P
    Eur Urol; 2011 Mar; 59(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 21095055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients.
    Ludovico GM; Dachille G; Pagliarulo G; D'Elia C; Mondaini N; Gacci M; Detti B; Malossini G; Bartoletti R; Cai T
    Oncol Rep; 2013 Jun; 29(6):2445-50. PubMed ID: 23545628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Oncological and functional outcomes 1 year after radical prostatectomy for very-low-risk prostate cancer: results from the prospective LAPPRO trial.
    Carlsson S; Jäderling F; Wallerstedt A; Nyberg T; Stranne J; Thorsteinsdottir T; Carlsson SV; Bjartell A; Hugosson J; Haglind E; Steineck G
    BJU Int; 2016 Aug; 118(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 26867018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Superior quality of life and improved surgical margins are achievable with robotic radical prostatectomy after a long learning curve: a prospective single-surgeon study of 1552 consecutive cases.
    Thompson JE; Egger S; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Rasiah K; Stricker PD
    Eur Urol; 2014 Mar; 65(3):521-31. PubMed ID: 24287319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective comprehensive assessment of sexual function after retropubic non nerve sparing radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.
    Trinchieri A; Nicola M; Masini F; Mangiarotti B
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2005 Dec; 77(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 16444937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective longitudinal comparative study of early health-related quality-of-life outcomes in patients undergoing surgical treatment for localized prostate cancer: a short-term evaluation of five approaches from a single institution.
    Ball AJ; Gambill B; Fabrizio MD; Davis JW; Given RW; Lynch DF; Shaves M; Schellhammer PF
    J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):723-31. PubMed ID: 17094746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer provides durable cancer control with excellent quality of life: a structured debate.
    Walsh PC
    J Urol; 2000 Jun; 163(6):1802-7. PubMed ID: 10799186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age stratified functional outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Rogers CG; Su LM; Link RE; Sullivan W; Wagner A; Pavlovich CP
    J Urol; 2006 Dec; 176(6 Pt 1):2448-52. PubMed ID: 17085126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy - An analysis of outcomes from a UK tertiary referral centre.
    Sachdeva A; Veeratterapillay R; Voysey A; Kelly K; Johnson MI; Aning J; Soomro NA
    BMC Urol; 2017 Oct; 17(1):91. PubMed ID: 28969608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.