331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30340806)
21. Lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a descriptive analysis of different implants in current practice.
Werthel JD; Walch G; Vegehan E; Deransart P; Sanchez-Sotelo J; Valenti P
Int Orthop; 2019 Oct; 43(10):2349-2360. PubMed ID: 31254018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Standard versus bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a retrospective comparative cohort study.
Collin P; Liu X; Denard PJ; Gain S; Nowak A; Lädermann A
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Jan; 27(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 28969891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Does lateralizing the glenosphere center of rotation by 4 mm decrease scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a 135° humeral component?
Harmsen SM; Robaina J; Campbell D; Denard PJ; Gobezie R; Lederman ES
JSES Int; 2022 May; 6(3):442-446. PubMed ID: 35572439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reassessing glenoid inclination in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with glenosphere lateralization.
Mahendraraj KA; Shields MV; Grubhofer F; Golenbock SW; Jawa A
Bone Joint J; 2021 Feb; 103-B(2):360-365. PubMed ID: 33517737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Glenosphere design affects range of movement and risk of friction-type scapular impingement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Werner BS; Chaoui J; Walch G
Bone Joint J; 2018 Sep; 100-B(9):1182-1186. PubMed ID: 30168761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical and radiological outcomes in lateralized versus nonlateralized and distalized glenospheres in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized control trial.
Southam BR; Bedeir YH; Johnson BM; Hasselfeld KA; Kloby MA; Grawe BM
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Jul; 32(7):1420-1431. PubMed ID: 37003429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Quantifying the competing relationship between adduction range of motion and baseplate micromotion with lateralization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
Elwell J; Choi J; Willing R
J Biomech; 2017 Feb; 52():24-30. PubMed ID: 28024662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The association between humeral lengthening and clinical outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Haeffner BD; Cueto RJ; Abdelmalik BM; Hones KM; Wright JO; Srinivasan RC; King JJ; Wright TW; Werthel JD; Schoch BS; Hao KA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Oct; 32(10):e477-e494. PubMed ID: 37379967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Revision for a failed reverse: a 12-year review of a lateralized implant.
Stephens BC; Simon P; Clark RE; Christmas KN; Stone GP; Lorenzetti AJ; Frankle MA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 May; 25(5):e115-24. PubMed ID: 26704360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty vs BIO-RSA: clinical and radiographic outcomes at short term follow-up.
Kirzner N; Paul E; Moaveni A
J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Oct; 13(1):256. PubMed ID: 30326920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical outcomes related to glenosphere overhang in reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a lateralized humeral design.
Dean EW; Dean NE; Wright TW; Hao KA; Schoch BS; Farmer KW; Struk AM; King JJ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Oct; 31(10):2106-2115. PubMed ID: 35472577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Onlay versus Inlay humeral steam in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA): clinical and biomechanical study.
Beltrame A; Di Benedetto P; Cicuto C; Cainero V; Chisoni R; Causero A
Acta Biomed; 2019 Dec; 90(12-S):54-63. PubMed ID: 31821285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty vs. metal augments in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up.
Van de Kleut ML; Yuan X; Teeter MG; Athwal GS
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Mar; 31(3):591-600. PubMed ID: 34968693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Optimizing reverse shoulder arthroplasty component position in the setting of advanced arthritis with posterior glenoid erosion: a computer-enhanced range of motion analysis.
Keener JD; Patterson BM; Orvets N; Aleem AW; Chamberlain AM
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Feb; 27(2):339-349. PubMed ID: 29332666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparative study of 145° onlay curved stem versus 155° inlay straight stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty: clinical and radiographic results with a minimum 2-year follow-up.
Giordano MC; Corona K; Morris BJ; Mocini F; Saturnino L; Cerciello S
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Oct; 31(10):2089-2095. PubMed ID: 35430369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of Clinical and Radiological Results according to Glenosphere Position in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Short-term Follow-up Study.
Choi CH; Kim SG; Lee JJ; Kwack BH
Clin Orthop Surg; 2017 Mar; 9(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 28261432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of lateral offset center of rotation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical study.
Henninger HB; Barg A; Anderson AE; Bachus KN; Burks RT; Tashjian RZ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2012 Sep; 21(9):1128-35. PubMed ID: 22036546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The influence of humeral head inclination in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.
Erickson BJ; Frank RM; Harris JD; Mall N; Romeo AA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2015 Jun; 24(6):988-93. PubMed ID: 25725965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Problems, complications, and reinterventions in 4893 onlay humeral lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasties: a systematic review (part I-complications).
Ascione F; Schiavone Panni A; Braile A; Corona K; Toro G; Capuano N; Romano AM
J Orthop Traumatol; 2021 Jul; 22(1):27. PubMed ID: 34236540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effect of glenosphere lateralization and inferiorization on deltoid force in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
Nolte PC; Miles JW; Tanghe KK; Brady AW; Midtgaard KS; Cooper JD; Lacheta L; Provencher MT; Millett PJ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Aug; 30(8):1817-1826. PubMed ID: 33290849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
