517 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30341450)
1. Comparison of adjustable male slings and artificial urinary sphincter in the treatment of male urinary incontinence: a retrospective analysis of patient selection and postoperative continence status.
Grabbert M; Hüsch T; Kretschmer A; Kirschner-Hermanns R; Anding R; Rose A; Friedl A; Obaje A; Heidenreich A; Brehmer B; Naumann CM; Queissert F; Loertzer H; Pfitzenmaier J; Nyarangi-Dix J; Kurosch M; Olianas R; Homberg R; Abdunnur R; Schweiger J; Hofmann T; Wotzka C; Pottek T; Huebner W; Haferkamp A; Bauer RM
World J Urol; 2019 Jul; 37(7):1415-1420. PubMed ID: 30341450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient Selection in Surgical Centers of Expertise in the Treatment of Patients with Moderate to Severe Male Urinary Stress Incontinence.
Grabbert M; Bauer RM; Hüsch T; Kretschmer A; Kirschner-Hermanns R; Anding R; Brehmer B; Naumann CM; Queissert F; Khoder WY; Gratzke C; Hofmann T; Haferkamp A; Huebner WA
Urol Int; 2020; 104(11-12):902-907. PubMed ID: 32712608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of complication rates related to male urethral slings and artificial urinary sphincters for urinary incontinence: national multi-institutional analysis of ACS-NSQIP database.
Alwaal A; Harris CR; Awad MA; Allen IE; Breyer BN
Int Urol Nephrol; 2016 Oct; 48(10):1571-6. PubMed ID: 27417131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Functional outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter implantation with distal bulbar double cuff in men with and without a history of external beam radiotherapy: an analysis of a prospective database.
Maurer V; Marks P; Dahlem R; Rosenbaum CM; Meyer CP; Riechardt S; Fisch M; Ludwig T
BJU Int; 2019 Dec; 124(6):1040-1046. PubMed ID: 31351030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Artificial urinary sphincter significantly better than fixed sling for moderate post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence: a propensity score-matched study.
Sacco E; Gandi C; Marino F; Totaro A; Di Gianfrancesco L; Palermo G; Pierconti F; Racioppi M; Bassi P
BJU Int; 2021 Feb; 127(2):229-237. PubMed ID: 32744793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Artificial Urinary Sphincter Outperforms Sling for Moderate Male Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Khouri RK; Ortiz NM; Baumgarten AS; Ward EE; VanDyke ME; Hudak SJ; Morey AF
Urology; 2020 Jul; 141():168-172. PubMed ID: 32289365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Treatment of stress urinary incontinence after prostate surgery: results of the artificial urinary sphincter after suburethral sling failure].
Belot PY; Fassi-Fehri H; Crouzet S; Codas R; Badet L; Gelet A; Martin X
Prog Urol; 2012 Oct; 22(11):644-9. PubMed ID: 22999089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Male Sling and Artificial Urethral Sphincter for Male Stress Urinary Incontinence Among Certifying American Urologists.
Liu JS; Hofer MD; Milose J; Oberlin DT; Flury SC; Morey AF; Gonzalez CM
Urology; 2016 Jan; 87():95-9. PubMed ID: 26344152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk Factors for Failure of Male Slings and Artificial Urinary Sphincters: Results from a Large Middle European Cohort Study.
Hüsch T; Kretschmer A; Thomsen F; Kronlachner D; Kurosch M; Obaje A; Anding R; Pottek T; Rose A; Olianas R; Friedl A; Hübner W; Homberg R; Pfitzenmaier J; Grein U; Queissert F; Naumann CM; Schweiger J; Wotzka C; Nyarangi-Dix J; Hofmann T; Ulm K; Bauer RM; Haferkamp A;
Urol Int; 2017; 99(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 27598774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of adjustable continence therapy periurethral balloons and artificial urinary sphincter in female patients with stress urinary incontinence due to intrinsic sphincter deficiency.
Freton L; Tondut L; Enderle I; Hascoet J; Manunta A; Peyronnet B
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jul; 29(7):949-957. PubMed ID: 29332254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Survival of the artificial urinary sphincter in a changing patient profile.
Te Dorsthorst MJ; van der Doelen MJ; Farag F; Martens FMJ; Heesakkers JPFA
World J Urol; 2019 May; 37(5):899-906. PubMed ID: 30155727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Artificial Urinary Sphincter is Superior to a Secondary Transobturator Male Sling in Cases of a Primary Sling Failure.
Ajay D; Zhang H; Gupta S; Selph JP; Belsante MJ; Lentz AC; Webster GD; Peterson AC
J Urol; 2015 Oct; 194(4):1038-42. PubMed ID: 25963183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter implantation as a salvage surgical procedure for challenging cases of male stress urinary incontinence: surgical technique and functional outcomes in a contemporary series.
Wiedemann L; Cornu JN; Haab E; Peyrat L; Beley S; Cathelineau X; Haab F
BJU Int; 2013 Dec; 112(8):1163-8. PubMed ID: 24053170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Secondary Sling Implantation after Failure of Primary Surgical Treatment for Male Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Retrospective Study.
Grabbert M; Hüsch T; Kretschmer A; Kirschner-Hermanns R; Anding R; Brehmer B; Naumann CM; Queissert F; Loertzer H; Khoder W; Gratzke C; Hofmann T; Huebner W; Haferkamp A; Bauer RM
Urol Int; 2020; 104(7-8):625-630. PubMed ID: 32541144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of outcomes for adjustable bulbourethral male sling and artificial urinary sphincter after previous artificial urinary sphincter erosion.
Tuygun C; Imamoglu A; Gucuk A; Goktug G; Demirel F
Urology; 2009 Jun; 73(6):1363-7. PubMed ID: 19376562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Male synthetic sling versus artificial urinary sphincter trial for men with urodynamic stress incontinence after prostate surgery (MASTER): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Constable L; Cotterill N; Cooper D; Glazener C; Drake MJ; Forrest M; Harding C; Kilonzo M; MacLennan G; McCormack K; McDonald A; Mundy A; Norrie J; Pickard R; Ramsay C; Smith R; Wileman S; Abrams P;
Trials; 2018 Feb; 19(1):131. PubMed ID: 29467024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What if artificial urinary sphincter is not possible? Feasibility and effectiveness of ProACT for patients with persistent stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy treated by sling.
Munier P; Nicolas M; Tricard T; Droupy S; Costa P; Saussine C
Neurourol Urodyn; 2020 Jun; 39(5):1417-1422. PubMed ID: 32249971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter implantation in the irradiated patient.
Sathianathen NJ; McGuigan SM; Moon DA
BJU Int; 2014 Apr; 113(4):636-41. PubMed ID: 24131859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of previous urethroplasty on the outcome after artificial urinary sphincter implantation: a prospective evaluation.
Sayedahmed K; Olianas R; Kaftan B; Omar M; El Shazly M; Burger M; Mayr R; Rosenhammer B
World J Urol; 2020 Jan; 38(1):183-191. PubMed ID: 30980093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy and safety of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS): Results of a large multi-institutional cohort of patients with mid-term follow-up.
Tutolo M; Cornu JN; Bauer RM; Ahyai S; Bozzini G; Heesakkers J; Drake MJ; Tikkinen KAO; Launonen E; Larré S; Thiruchelvam N; Lee R; Li P; Favro M; Zaffuto E; Bachmann A; Martinez-Salamanca JI; Pichon T; De Nunzio C; Ammirati E; Haab F; Van Der Aa F
Neurourol Urodyn; 2019 Feb; 38(2):710-718. PubMed ID: 30575997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
