407 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30341923)
1. Ectogenesis and the case against the right to the death of the foetus.
Blackshaw BP; Rodger D
Bioethics; 2019 Jan; 33(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 30341923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion and Ectogenesis: Moral Compromise.
Simkulet W
J Med Ethics; 2020 Feb; 46(2):93-98. PubMed ID: 31537616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ectogenesis, abortion and a right to the death of the fetus.
Räsänen J
Bioethics; 2017 Nov; 31(9):697-702. PubMed ID: 29044695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pregnant people, inseminators and tissues of human origin: how ectogenesis challenges the concept of abortion.
Kendal E
Monash Bioeth Rev; 2020 Dec; 38(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 33175992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is There a Right to the Death of the Foetus?
Mathison E; Davis J
Bioethics; 2017 May; 31(4):313-320. PubMed ID: 28182294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Doubts about a classic defence of abortion.
Difford J
Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2011; 17(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 23350221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. If fetuses are persons, abortion is a public health crisis.
Blackshaw B; Rodger D
Bioethics; 2021 Jun; 35(5):465-472. PubMed ID: 33811355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ectogenesis and a right to the death of the prenatal human being: A reply to Räsänen.
Kaczor C
Bioethics; 2018 Nov; 32(9):634-638. PubMed ID: 30252944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Moral status of the fetus and the permissibility of abortion: a contractarian response to Thomson's violinist thought experiment.
Minehan MJ
J Med Ethics; 2022 Jun; 48(6):407-410. PubMed ID: 33963066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gestation, equality and freedom: ectogenesis as a political perspective.
Cavaliere G
J Med Ethics; 2020 Feb; 46(2):76-82. PubMed ID: 31704782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. There is no right to the death of the fetus.
Hendricks P
Bioethics; 2018 Jul; 32(6):395-397. PubMed ID: 29883519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The parenthood argument.
Simkulet W
Bioethics; 2018 Jan; 32(1):10-15. PubMed ID: 29171657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Viable Violinist.
Hawking M
Bioethics; 2016 Jun; 30(5):312-6. PubMed ID: 26423668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Why a right to life rules out infanticide: A final reply to Räsänen.
Blackshaw BP; Rodger D
Bioethics; 2019 Oct; 33(8):965-967. PubMed ID: 31389040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Women, ectogenesis and ethical theory.
Cannold L
J Appl Philos; 1995; 12(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 12416524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Why arguments against infanticide remain convincing: A reply to Räsänen.
Rodger D; Blackshaw BP; Wilcox C
Bioethics; 2018 Mar; 32(3):215-219. PubMed ID: 29369381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Violinists, demandingness, and the impairment argument against abortion.
Crummett D
Bioethics; 2020 Feb; 34(2):214-220. PubMed ID: 31782822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion logic and paternal responsibilities: one more look at Judith Thomson's "A defense of abortion.
Pavlischek KJ
Public Aff Q; 1993 Oct; 7(4):341-61. PubMed ID: 11656264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Perfect Womb: Promoting Equality of (Fetal) Opportunity.
Kendal E
J Bioeth Inq; 2017 Jun; 14(2):185-194. PubMed ID: 28224271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The ethics of ectogenesis-aided foetal treatment.
Segers S; Pennings G; Mertes H
Bioethics; 2020 May; 34(4):364-370. PubMed ID: 32037564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
