248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30341961)
1. Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 5-Year data.
Thoma DS; Haas R; Sporniak-Tutak K; Garcia A; Taylor TD; Hämmerle CHF
J Clin Periodontol; 2018 Dec; 45(12):1465-1474. PubMed ID: 30341961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomized controlled multi-centre study comparing shorter dental implants (6 mm) to longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 10-year data.
Thoma DS; Haas R; Sporniak-Tutak K; Garcia A; Taylor TD; Tutak M; Pohl V; Hämmerle CHF
J Clin Periodontol; 2024 Apr; 51(4):499-509. PubMed ID: 38296249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures. Part 1: demographics and patient-reported outcomes at 1 year of loading.
Thoma DS; Haas R; Tutak M; Garcia A; Schincaglia GP; Hämmerle CH
J Clin Periodontol; 2015 Jan; 42(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 25418606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short dental implants (6 mm) versus long dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 3-year results from a multicentre, randomized, controlled clinical trial.
Pohl V; Thoma DS; Sporniak-Tutak K; Garcia-Garcia A; Taylor TD; Haas R; Hämmerle CH
J Clin Periodontol; 2017 Apr; 44(4):438-445. PubMed ID: 28081288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized controlled multicenter study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures. Part 2: clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1 year of loading.
Schincaglia GP; Thoma DS; Haas R; Tutak M; Garcia A; Taylor TD; Hämmerle CH
J Clin Periodontol; 2015 Nov; 42(11):1042-51. PubMed ID: 26425812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Single crowns in the resorbed posterior maxilla supported by either 11-mm implants combined with sinus floor elevation or 6-mm implants:A 5-year randomised controlled trial.
Guljé FL; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A; Meijer HJA
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(3):315-326. PubMed ID: 31535100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single crowns in the resorbed posterior maxilla supported by either 6-mm implants or by 11-mm implants combined with sinus floor elevation surgery: a 1-year randomised controlled trial.
Guljé FL; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A; Meijer HJ
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 25237669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Short (5 and 7 mm long) porous implants in the posterior atrophic maxilla: a 5-year report of a prospective single-cohort study.
Perelli M; Abundo R; Corrente G; Saccone C
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2012; 5(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 23000710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implant placement in the atrophic posterior maxilla with sinus elevation without bone grafting: a 2-year prospective study.
Rajkumar GC; Aher V; Ramaiya S; Manjunath GS; Kumar DV
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):526-30. PubMed ID: 23527355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implants inserted with graftless osteotome sinus floor elevation - A 5-year post-loading retrospective study.
Zill A; Precht C; Beck-Broichsitter B; Sehner S; Smeets R; Heiland M; Rendenbach C; Henningsen A
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(3):277-289. PubMed ID: 27722225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm-long, 4 mm-wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. Preliminary results from a pilot randomised controlled trial.
Esposito M; Cannizzaro G; Soardi E; Pistilli R; Piattelli M; Corvino V; Felice P
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2012; 5(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 22518377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single crowns in the posterior maxilla supported by either 11-mm long implants with sinus floor augmentation or by 6-mm long implants: A 10-year randomized controlled trial.
Guljé FL; Raghoebar GM; Gareb B; Vissink A; Meijer HJA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Jan; 35(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 37941089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rehabilitation of the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla Using Splinted Short Implants or Sinus Augmentation with Standard-Length Implants: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Pieri F; Caselli E; Forlivesi C; Corinaldesi G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1179-88. PubMed ID: 27632276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes of 6.5-mm Hydrophilic Implants and Long Implants Placed with Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation in the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Comparison.
Yu H; Wang X; Qiu L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 19(1):111-122. PubMed ID: 27436543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Extra-Short Implants with Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation: A Prospective Clinical Study.
Nizam N; Gürlek Ö; Kaval ME
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):415-422. PubMed ID: 32142579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review.
Wallace SS; Froum SJ
Ann Periodontol; 2003 Dec; 8(1):328-43. PubMed ID: 14971260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 × 5 mm implants with a nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. 3-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
Gastaldi G; Felice P; Pistilli V; Barausse C; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 29557400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What Is the Most Effective Rehabilitation Method for Posterior Maxillas With 4 to 8 mm of Residual Alveolar Bone Height Below the Maxillary Sinus With Implant-Supported Prostheses? A Frequentist Network Meta-Analysis.
Al-Moraissi EA; Altairi NH; Abotaleb B; Al-Iryani G; Halboub E; Alakhali MS
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 77(1):70.e1-70.e33. PubMed ID: 30243705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 4 mm long vs longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic jaws: 1-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Bolle C; Felice P; Barausse C; Pistilli V; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 29557399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Follow-up study of implants with turned or oxidized surfaces placed after sinus augmentation.
Jungner M; Legrell PE; Lundgren S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(6):1380-7. PubMed ID: 25397801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
