These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

449 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30342029)

  • 1. Automated polyp detection in the colorectum: a prospective study (with videos).
    Klare P; Sander C; Prinzen M; Haller B; Nowack S; Abdelhafez M; Poszler A; Brown H; Wilhelm D; Schmid RM; von Delius S; Wittenberg T
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):576-582.e1. PubMed ID: 30342029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Polyp Sizing Poster Improves Polyp Measurement but not Adenoma Detection Rates by Endoscopists in a Large Community Practice.
    Shaukat A; Shamsi N; Menk J; Church TR; Rank J; Colton JB
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Sep; 17(10):2034-2041. PubMed ID: 30312788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of a real-time automatic quality control system on colorectal polyp and adenoma detection: a prospective randomized controlled study (with videos).
    Su JR; Li Z; Shao XJ; Ji CR; Ji R; Zhou RC; Li GC; Liu GQ; He YS; Zuo XL; Li YQ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Feb; 91(2):415-424.e4. PubMed ID: 31454493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Difference in Physician- and Patient-Dependent Factors Contributing to Adenoma Detection Rate and Serrated Polyp Detection Rate.
    Cavicchi M; Tharsis G; Burtin P; Cattan P; Venezia F; Tordjman G; Gillet A; Samama J; Nahon-Uzan K; Karsenti D
    Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Dec; 64(12):3579-3588. PubMed ID: 31471862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
    Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Weiss JE; Robinson CM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 28153571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship between the endoscopic withdrawal time and adenoma/polyp detection rate in individual colonic segments: a KASID multicenter study.
    Jung Y; Joo YE; Kim HG; Jeon SR; Cha JM; Yang HJ; Kim JW; Lee J; Kim KO; Song HK; Hwangbo Y; Shin JE
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):523-530. PubMed ID: 30267654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prevalence of Adenomas on Surveillance Colonoscopies for Patients with a History of Colonic Polyps of Unknown Histology.
    Doyle JB; Krigel A; Lebwohl B
    Dig Dis Sci; 2022 Jul; 67(7):3239-3243. PubMed ID: 34156591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The proximal serrated polyp detection rate is an easy-to-measure proxy for the detection rate of clinically relevant serrated polyps.
    IJspeert JE; van Doorn SC; van der Brug YM; Bastiaansen BA; Fockens P; Dekker E
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Nov; 82(5):870-7. PubMed ID: 25935704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variation in polyp detection rates at screening colonoscopy.
    Imperiale TF; Glowinski EA; Juliar BE; Azzouz F; Ransohoff DF
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Jun; 69(7):1288-95. PubMed ID: 19481649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simple proxies for detection of clinically significant serrated polyps and data for their benchmarks.
    Park SK; Park SH; Yang HJ; Jung YS; Park JH; Sohn CI; Park DI
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Aug; 35(8):1365-1371. PubMed ID: 31907971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk factors associated with colorectal flat adenoma detection.
    Nicolás-Pérez D; Parra-Blanco A; Gimeno-García AZ; Ortega-Sánchez JA; Carrillo-Palau M; Jiménez-Sosa A; Quintero-Carrion E
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Mar; 25(3):302-8. PubMed ID: 23169312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Novel endocuff-assisted colonoscopy significantly increases the polyp detection rate: a randomized controlled trial.
    Biecker E; Floer M; Heinecke A; Ströbel P; Böhme R; Schepke M; Meister T
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015; 49(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 24921209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of artificial intelligence on colorectal polyp detection for early-career endoscopists: an international comparative study.
    Ainechi D; Misawa M; Barua I; Larsen SLV; Paulsen V; Garborg KK; Aabakken L; Tønnesen CJ; Løberg M; Kalager M; Kudo SE; Hotta K; Ohtsuka K; Saito S; Ikematsu H; Saito Y; Matsuda T; Itoh H; Mori K; Bretthauer M; Mori Y
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2022 Oct; 57(10):1272-1277. PubMed ID: 35605150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nonneoplastic polypectomy during screening colonoscopy: the impact on polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and overall cost.
    Atia MA; Patel NC; Ratuapli SK; Boroff ES; Crowell MD; Gurudu SR; Faigel DO; Leighton JA; Ramirez FC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Aug; 82(2):370-375.e1. PubMed ID: 25843614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lower Adenoma Miss Rate of Computer-Aided Detection-Assisted Colonoscopy vs Routine White-Light Colonoscopy in a Prospective Tandem Study.
    Wang P; Liu P; Glissen Brown JR; Berzin TM; Zhou G; Lei S; Liu X; Li L; Xiao X
    Gastroenterology; 2020 Oct; 159(4):1252-1261.e5. PubMed ID: 32562721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. G-EYE colonoscopy is superior to standard colonoscopy for increasing adenoma detection rate: an international randomized controlled trial (with videos).
    Shirin H; Shpak B; Epshtein J; Karstensen JG; Hoffman A; de Ridder R; Testoni PA; Ishaq S; Reddy DN; Gross SA; Neumann H; Goetz M; Abramowich D; Moshkowitz M; Mizrahi M; Vilmann P; Rey JW; Sanduleanu-Dascalescu S; Viale E; Chaudhari H; Pochapin MB; Yair M; Shnell M; Yaari S; Hendel JW; Teubner D; Bogie RMM; Notaristefano C; Simantov R; Gluck N; Israeli E; Stigaard T; Matalon S; Vilkin A; Benson A; Sloth S; Maliar A; Waizbard A; Jacob H; Thielsen P; Shachar E; Rochberger S; Hershcovici T; Plougmann JI; Braverman M; Tsvang E; Abedi AA; Brachman Y; Siersema PD; Kiesslich R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 30273591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deep Learning Localizes and Identifies Polyps in Real Time With 96% Accuracy in Screening Colonoscopy.
    Urban G; Tripathi P; Alkayali T; Mittal M; Jalali F; Karnes W; Baldi P
    Gastroenterology; 2018 Oct; 155(4):1069-1078.e8. PubMed ID: 29928897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Serrated and adenomatous polyp detection increases with longer withdrawal time: results from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
    Butterly L; Robinson CM; Anderson JC; Weiss JE; Goodrich M; Onega TL; Amos CI; Beach ML
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 109(3):417-26. PubMed ID: 24394752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Narrow-band Imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic Classification to predict polyp histology: REDEFINE study (with videos).
    Repici A; Ciscato C; Correale L; Bisschops R; Bhandari P; Dekker E; Pech O; Radaelli F; Hassan C
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Sep; 84(3):479-486.e3. PubMed ID: 26928372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Real-time automatic detection system increases colonoscopic polyp and adenoma detection rates: a prospective randomised controlled study.
    Wang P; Berzin TM; Glissen Brown JR; Bharadwaj S; Becq A; Xiao X; Liu P; Li L; Song Y; Zhang D; Li Y; Xu G; Tu M; Liu X
    Gut; 2019 Oct; 68(10):1813-1819. PubMed ID: 30814121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.