These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30342443)

  • 1. Bayesian calibration of force-fields from experimental data: TIP4P water.
    Dutta R; Brotzakis ZF; Mira A
    J Chem Phys; 2018 Oct; 149(15):154110. PubMed ID: 30342443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian uncertainty quantification and propagation in molecular dynamics simulations: a high performance computing framework.
    Angelikopoulos P; Papadimitriou C; Koumoutsakos P
    J Chem Phys; 2012 Oct; 137(14):144103. PubMed ID: 23061835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parameter Estimation of Platelets Deposition: Approximate Bayesian Computation With High Performance Computing.
    Dutta R; Chopard B; Lätt J; Dubois F; Zouaoui Boudjeltia K; Mira A
    Front Physiol; 2018; 9():1128. PubMed ID: 30177886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Maximum-Likelihood Approach to Force-Field Calibration.
    Zaborowski B; Jagieła D; Czaplewski C; Hałabis A; Lewandowska A; Żmudzińska W; Ołdziej S; Karczyńska A; Omieczynski C; Wirecki T; Liwo A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Sep; 55(9):2050-70. PubMed ID: 26263302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microsimulation Model Calibration with Approximate Bayesian Computation in R: A Tutorial.
    Shewmaker P; Chrysanthopoulou SA; Iskandar R; Lake D; Jutkowitz E
    Med Decis Making; 2022 Jul; 42(5):557-570. PubMed ID: 35311401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fusing heterogeneous data for the calibration of molecular dynamics force fields using hierarchical Bayesian models.
    Wu S; Angelikopoulos P; Tauriello G; Papadimitriou C; Koumoutsakos P
    J Chem Phys; 2016 Dec; 145(24):244112. PubMed ID: 28049338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A hierarchical Bayesian framework for force field selection in molecular dynamics simulations.
    Wu S; Angelikopoulos P; Papadimitriou C; Moser R; Koumoutsakos P
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2016 Feb; 374(2060):. PubMed ID: 26712642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical approaches to forcefield calibration and prediction uncertainty in molecular simulation.
    Cailliez F; Pernot P
    J Chem Phys; 2011 Feb; 134(5):054124. PubMed ID: 21303109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian experimental design for models with intractable likelihoods.
    Drovandi CC; Pettitt AN
    Biometrics; 2013 Dec; 69(4):937-48. PubMed ID: 24131221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) gives exact results under the assumption of model error.
    Wilkinson RD
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2013 May; 12(2):129-41. PubMed ID: 23652634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Towards efficient uncertainty quantification in complex and large-scale biomechanical problems based on a Bayesian multi-fidelity scheme.
    Biehler J; Gee MW; Wall WA
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2015 Jun; 14(3):489-513. PubMed ID: 25245816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rational design of ion force fields based on thermodynamic solvation properties.
    Horinek D; Mamatkulov SI; Netz RR
    J Chem Phys; 2009 Mar; 130(12):124507. PubMed ID: 19334851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimized Magnesium Force Field Parameters for Biomolecular Simulations with Accurate Solvation, Ion-Binding, and Water-Exchange Properties in SPC/E, TIP3P-fb, TIP4P/2005, TIP4P-Ew, and TIP4P-D.
    Grotz KK; Schwierz N
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Jan; 18(1):526-537. PubMed ID: 34881568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of different uncertainty techniques in urban stormwater quantity and quality modelling.
    Dotto CB; Mannina G; Kleidorfer M; Vezzaro L; Henrichs M; McCarthy DT; Freni G; Rauch W; Deletic A
    Water Res; 2012 May; 46(8):2545-58. PubMed ID: 22402270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On predictive inference for intractable models via approximate Bayesian computation.
    Järvenpää M; Corander J
    Stat Comput; 2023; 33(2):42. PubMed ID: 36785730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surrogate-based Bayesian calibration of biomechanical models with isotropic material behavior.
    Römer U; Liu J; Böl M
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2022 Apr; 38(4):e3575. PubMed ID: 35094499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental verification of force fields for molecular dynamics simulations using Gly-Pro-Gly-Gly.
    Aliev AE; Courtier-Murias D
    J Phys Chem B; 2010 Sep; 114(38):12358-75. PubMed ID: 20825228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of Sampling Algorithms Used for Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification of Molecular Dynamics Force Fields.
    Sose AT; Gustke T; Wang F; Anand G; Pasupuleti S; Savara A; Deshmukh SA
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2024 Jul; 20(13):5732-5742. PubMed ID: 38924093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The metabolic network of Clostridium acetobutylicum: Comparison of the approximate Bayesian computation via sequential Monte Carlo (ABC-SMC) and profile likelihood estimation (PLE) methods for determinability analysis.
    Thorn GJ; King JR
    Math Biosci; 2016 Jan; 271():62-79. PubMed ID: 26561777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.