These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30342443)

  • 21. Non-polarizable force field of water based on the dielectric constant: TIP4P/ε.
    Fuentes-Azcatl R; Alejandre J
    J Phys Chem B; 2014 Feb; 118(5):1263-72. PubMed ID: 24422512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Coarse-Grained Force Field Calibration Based on Multiobjective Bayesian Optimization to Simulate Water Diffusion in Poly-ε-caprolactone.
    Sestito JM; Thatcher ML; Shu L; Harris TAL; Wang Y
    J Phys Chem A; 2020 Jun; 124(24):5042-5052. PubMed ID: 32452682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Piecewise Approximate Bayesian Computation: fast inference for discretely observed Markov models using a factorised posterior distribution.
    White SR; Kypraios T; Preston SP
    Stat Comput; 2015; 25(2):289-301. PubMed ID: 26097293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bayesian calibration of hyperelastic constitutive models of soft tissue.
    Madireddy S; Sista B; Vemaganti K
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Jun; 59():108-127. PubMed ID: 26751706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Inferring Rates and Length-Distributions of Indels Using Approximate Bayesian Computation.
    Levy Karin E; Shkedy D; Ashkenazy H; Cartwright RA; Pupko T
    Genome Biol Evol; 2017 May; 9(5):1280-1294. PubMed ID: 28453624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. BayCANN: Streamlining Bayesian Calibration With Artificial Neural Network Metamodeling.
    Jalal H; Trikalinos TA; Alarid-Escudero F
    Front Physiol; 2021; 12():662314. PubMed ID: 34113262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Validation of the GROMOS force-field parameter set 45Alpha3 against nuclear magnetic resonance data of hen egg lysozyme.
    Soares TA; Daura X; Oostenbrink C; Smith LJ; van Gunsteren WF
    J Biomol NMR; 2004 Dec; 30(4):407-22. PubMed ID: 15630561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Force Field for Water over Pt(111): Development, Assessment, and Comparison.
    Steinmann SN; Ferreira De Morais R; Götz AW; Fleurat-Lessard P; Iannuzzi M; Sautet P; Michel C
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Jun; 14(6):3238-3251. PubMed ID: 29660272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Model selection and parameter estimation for root architecture models using likelihood-free inference.
    Ziegler C; Dyson RJ; Johnston IG
    J R Soc Interface; 2019 Jul; 16(156):20190293. PubMed ID: 31288651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. ABCtoolbox: a versatile toolkit for approximate Bayesian computations.
    Wegmann D; Leuenberger C; Neuenschwander S; Excoffier L
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Mar; 11():116. PubMed ID: 20202215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quantifying uncertainty in parameter estimates for stochastic models of collective cell spreading using approximate Bayesian computation.
    Vo BN; Drovandi CC; Pettitt AN; Simpson MJ
    Math Biosci; 2015 May; 263():133-42. PubMed ID: 25747415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Using approximate Bayesian computation for estimating parameters in the cue-based retrieval model of sentence processing.
    Vasishth S
    MethodsX; 2020; 7():100850. PubMed ID: 32300544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of Monte Carlo-based Bayesian parameter estimation methods for stochastic models of genetic networks.
    Mariño IP; Zaikin A; Míguez J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182015. PubMed ID: 28797087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A simulation approach for change-points on phylogenetic trees.
    Persing A; Jasra A; Beskos A; Balding D; De Iorio M
    J Comput Biol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):10-24. PubMed ID: 25506749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of Bayesian and maximum-likelihood inference of population genetic parameters.
    Beerli P
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 22(3):341-5. PubMed ID: 16317072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bayesian Finite Element Model Updating and Assessment of Cable-Stayed Bridges Using Wireless Sensor Data.
    Asadollahi P; Huang Y; Li J
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Sep; 18(9):. PubMed ID: 30213096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. ABC random forests for Bayesian parameter inference.
    Raynal L; Marin JM; Pudlo P; Ribatet M; Robert CP; Estoup A
    Bioinformatics; 2019 May; 35(10):1720-1728. PubMed ID: 30321307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Monte Carlo simulation of TrueBeam flattening-filter-free beams using varian phase-space files: comparison with experimental data.
    Belosi MF; Rodriguez M; Fogliata A; Cozzi L; Sempau J; Clivio A; Nicolini G; Vanetti E; Krauss H; Khamphan C; Fenoglietto P; Puxeu J; Fedele D; Mancosu P; Brualla L
    Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):051707. PubMed ID: 24784373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation and Optimization of Interface Force Fields for Water on Gold Surfaces.
    Berg A; Peter C; Johnston K
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Nov; 13(11):5610-5623. PubMed ID: 28992416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. On optimal selection of summary statistics for approximate Bayesian computation.
    Nunes MA; Balding DJ
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2010; 9():Article34. PubMed ID: 20887273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.