These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30342443)

  • 41. HIV with contact tracing: a case study in approximate Bayesian computation.
    Blum MG; Tran VC
    Biostatistics; 2010 Oct; 11(4):644-60. PubMed ID: 20457785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A tutorial introduction to Bayesian inference for stochastic epidemic models using Approximate Bayesian Computation.
    Kypraios T; Neal P; Prangle D
    Math Biosci; 2017 May; 287():42-53. PubMed ID: 27444577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Molecular dynamics simulations of fluid cyclopropane with MP2/CBS-fitted intermolecular interaction potentials.
    Ho YC; Wang YS; Chao SD
    J Chem Phys; 2017 Aug; 147(6):064507. PubMed ID: 28810796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Molecular dynamics simulation for the test of calibrated OPLS-AA force field for binary liquid mixture of tri-iso-amyl phosphate and n-dodecane.
    Das A; Ali SM
    J Chem Phys; 2018 Feb; 148(7):074502. PubMed ID: 29471660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Uncertainty quantification, propagation and characterization by Bayesian analysis combined with global sensitivity analysis applied to dynamical intracellular pathway models.
    Eriksson O; Jauhiainen A; Maad Sasane S; Kramer A; Nair AG; Sartorius C; Hellgren Kotaleski J
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Jan; 35(2):284-292. PubMed ID: 30010712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. ABC: a useful Bayesian tool for the analysis of population data.
    Lopes JS; Beaumont MA
    Infect Genet Evol; 2010 Aug; 10(6):826-33. PubMed ID: 19879976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Part 2. Development of Enhanced Statistical Methods for Assessing Health Effects Associated with an Unknown Number of Major Sources of Multiple Air Pollutants.
    Park ES; Symanski E; Han D; Spiegelman C
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):51-113. PubMed ID: 26333239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Force field development for actinyl ions via quantum mechanical calculations: an approach to account for many body solvation effects.
    Rai N; Tiwari SP; Maginn EJ
    J Phys Chem B; 2012 Sep; 116(35):10885-97. PubMed ID: 22857380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. ML parameter estimation for Markov random fields with applications to Bayesian tomography.
    Saquib SS; Bouman CA; Sauer K
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 1998; 7(7):1029-44. PubMed ID: 18276318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Estimating mutation rates in a Markov branching process using approximate Bayesian computation.
    Lu R; Zhu H; Wu X
    J Theor Biol; 2023 May; 565():111467. PubMed ID: 36963627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Efficient computation of partial expected value of sample information using Bayesian approximation.
    Brennan A; Kharroubi SA
    J Health Econ; 2007 Jan; 26(1):122-48. PubMed ID: 16945438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Force-field development and molecular dynamics simulations of ferrocene-peptide conjugates as a scaffold for hydrogenase mimics.
    de Hatten X; Cournia Z; Huc I; Smith JC; Metzler-Nolte N
    Chemistry; 2007; 13(29):8139-52. PubMed ID: 17763506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Uncertainty quantification for constitutive model calibration of brain tissue.
    Brewick PT; Teferra K
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Sep; 85():237-255. PubMed ID: 29935439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A computationally efficient algorithm for genomic prediction using a Bayesian model.
    Wang T; Chen YP; Goddard ME; Meuwissen TH; Kemper KE; Hayes BJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):34. PubMed ID: 25926276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Data driven inference for the repulsive exponent of the Lennard-Jones potential in molecular dynamics simulations.
    Kulakova L; Arampatzis G; Angelikopoulos P; Hadjidoukas P; Papadimitriou C; Koumoutsakos P
    Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):16576. PubMed ID: 29185461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Parameterization of a reactive force field using a Monte Carlo algorithm.
    Iype E; Hütter M; Jansen AP; Nedea SV; Rindt CC
    J Comput Chem; 2013 May; 34(13):1143-54. PubMed ID: 23420666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Simulating vapor-liquid nucleation of water: A combined histogram-reweighting and aggregation-volume-bias Monte Carlo investigation for fixed-charge and polarizable models.
    Chen B; Siepmann JI; Klein ML
    J Phys Chem A; 2005 Feb; 109(6):1137-45. PubMed ID: 16833423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Approximate Bayesian computation techniques for optical characterization of nanoparticle clusters.
    Ericok OB; Cemgil AT; Erturk H
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2018 Jan; 35(1):88-97. PubMed ID: 29328096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Calibration of Boltzmann distribution priors in Bayesian data analysis.
    Mechelke M; Habeck M
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2012 Dec; 86(6 Pt 2):066705. PubMed ID: 23368076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Bayesian analysis of physiologically based toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic models.
    Hack CE
    Toxicology; 2006 Apr; 221(2-3):241-8. PubMed ID: 16466842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.