272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30343063)
1. Effects of debonding of orthodontic brackets on topography and surface roughness of composite restorations.
Moradi M; Hormozi E; Shamohammadi M; Rakhshan V
Int Orthod; 2018 Dec; 16(4):623-637. PubMed ID: 30343063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of various debonding and adhesive clearance methods on enamel surface: an in vitro study.
Fan XC; Chen L; Huang XF
BMC Oral Health; 2017 Feb; 17(1):58. PubMed ID: 28241812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of enamel surfaces after bracket debonding: an in-vivo study with scanning electron microscopy.
Alessandri Bonetti G; Zanarini M; Incerti Parenti S; Lattuca M; Marchionni S; Gatto MR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):696-702. PubMed ID: 22051490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In-vivo evaluation of the surface roughness and morphology of enamel after bracket removal and polishing by different techniques.
Faria-Júnior ÉM; Guiraldo RD; Berger SB; Correr AB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Contreras EF; Lopes MB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar; 147(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 25726399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of enamel surface roughness after orthodontic bracket debonding with atomic force microscopy.
Mohebi S; Shafiee HA; Ameli N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar; 151(3):521-527. PubMed ID: 28257737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamel loss, and time requirements.
Krell KV; Courey JM; Bishara SE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Mar; 103(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 8456784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enamel surface morphology after bracket debonding.
Osorio R; Toledano M; García-Godoy F
ASDC J Dent Child; 1998; 65(5):313-7, 354. PubMed ID: 9795734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bracket bonding with 15- or 60-second etching and adhesive remaining on enamel after debonding.
Osorio R; Toledano M; Garcia-Godoy F
Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 10022184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro evaluation of enamel surface roughness and morphology after orthodontic debonding: Traditional cleanup systems versus polymer bur.
Soares Tenório KC; Neupmann Feres MF; Tanaka CJ; Augusto MKM; Rodrigues JA; Pereira da Silva HD; Arana-Chavez VE; Roscoe MG
Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):546-554. PubMed ID: 32493624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding: A Comparative Study using Three Different Burs.
Garg R; Dixit P; Khosla T; Gupta P; Kalra H; Kumar P
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 May; 19(5):521-526. PubMed ID: 29807961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Enamel surface roughness following debonding resin clean up using high speed air-turbine and electric handpieces. In vitro study.
Yousry TN; Abolgheit S; Kassem HE
BMC Oral Health; 2024 May; 24(1):609. PubMed ID: 38796434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enamel surface evaluation after bracket debonding and different resin removal methods.
Vidor MM; Felix RP; Marchioro EM; Hahn L
Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 25992989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of enamel roughness after orthodontic debonding and clean-up procedures using zirconia, tungsten carbide, and white stone burs: an in vitro study.
Thawaba AA; Albelasy NF; Elsherbini AM; Hafez AM
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jul; 23(1):478. PubMed ID: 37443027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shear strength of ceramic brackets bonded to etched or unetched enamel.
Garcia-Godoy F; Martin S
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 19(3):181-3. PubMed ID: 8611486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of adhesive remnant removal on enamel topography after bracket debonding.
Cardoso LA; Valdrighi HC; Vedovello Filho M; Correr AB
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(6):105-12. PubMed ID: 25628087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Changes in the enamel after in vitro debonding of brackets bonded with a modified glass ionomer cement].
Sorel O; el Alam R; Chagneau F; Cathelineau G
Orthod Fr; 2000 Apr; 71(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 10916640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of air abrasion on the retention of metallic brackets bonded to fluorosed enamel surface.
Suma S; Anita G; Chandra Shekar BR; Kallury A
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 22945715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of different bonding and debonding techniques on debonding ceramic orthodontic brackets.
Sinha PK; Nanda RS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Aug; 112(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 9267223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficiency of different protocols for enamel clean-up after bracket debonding: an in vitro study.
Sigilião LC; Marquezan M; Elias CN; Ruellas AC; Sant'Anna EF
Dental Press J Orthod; 2015 Oct; 20(5):78-85. PubMed ID: 26560825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
