449 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30343096)
1. Inhibitory mechanisms involved in Stroop-matching and stop-signal tasks and the role of impulsivity.
Portugal ACA; Afonso AS; Caldas AL; Maturana W; Mocaiber I; Machado-Pinheiro W
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Nov; 191():234-243. PubMed ID: 30343096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Associations between trait impulsivity and prepotent response inhibition.
Aichert DS; Wöstmann NM; Costa A; Macare C; Wenig JR; Möller HJ; Rubia K; Ettinger U
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2012; 34(10):1016-32. PubMed ID: 22888795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interference scores have inadequate concurrent and convergent validity: Should we stop using the flanker, Simon, and spatial Stroop tasks?
Paap KR; Anders-Jefferson R; Zimiga B; Mason L; Mikulinsky R
Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Feb; 5(1):7. PubMed ID: 32056032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Response inhibition and interference control: Effects of schizophrenia, genetic risk, and schizotypy.
Ettinger U; Aichert DS; Wöstmann N; Dehning S; Riedel M; Kumari V
J Neuropsychol; 2018 Sep; 12(3):484-510. PubMed ID: 28485076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differential relationships between sub-traits of BIS-11 impulsivity and executive processes: an ERP study.
Kam JW; Dominelli R; Carlson SR
Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Aug; 85(2):174-87. PubMed ID: 22659220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Virtual Apartment-Based Stroop for assessing distractor inhibition in healthy aging.
Parsons TD; Barnett M
Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2019; 26(2):144-154. PubMed ID: 28976213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Slow and steady? Strategic adjustments in response caution are moderately reliable and correlate across tasks.
Hedge C; Vivian-Griffiths S; Powell G; Bompas A; Sumner P
Conscious Cogn; 2019 Oct; 75():102797. PubMed ID: 31421398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of trait impulsivity in response inhibition: event-related potentials in a stop-signal task.
Shen IH; Lee DS; Chen CL
Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Feb; 91(2):80-7. PubMed ID: 24316151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conduct problems in adolescence: three domains of inhibition and effect of gender.
Herba CM; Tranah T; Rubia K; Yule W
Dev Neuropsychol; 2006; 30(2):659-95. PubMed ID: 16995831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enhancing decision-making and cognitive impulse control with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied over the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC): A randomized and sham-controlled exploratory study.
Ouellet J; McGirr A; Van den Eynde F; Jollant F; Lepage M; Berlim MT
J Psychiatr Res; 2015 Oct; 69():27-34. PubMed ID: 26343591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Individual but not fragile: individual differences in task control predict Stroop facilitation.
Kalanthroff E; Henik A
Conscious Cogn; 2013 Jun; 22(2):413-9. PubMed ID: 23416541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Response inhibition in the parametric go/no-go task and its relation to impulsivity and subclinical psychopathy.
Weidacker K; Whiteford S; Boy F; Johnston SJ
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Mar; 70(3):473-487. PubMed ID: 26821562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Stroop-matching task as a tool to study the correspondence effect using images of graspable and non-graspable objects.
Caldas AL; Machado-Pinheiro W; Daneyko O; Riggio L
Psychol Res; 2020 Oct; 84(7):1815-1828. PubMed ID: 31030272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neural Architecture of Selective Stopping Strategies: Distinct Brain Activity Patterns Are Associated with Attentional Capture But Not with Outright Stopping.
Sebastian A; Rössler K; Wibral M; Mobascher A; Lieb K; Jung P; Tüscher O
J Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 37(40):9785-9794. PubMed ID: 28887387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The relationship between Stroop and stop-signal measures of inhibition in adolescents: influences from variations in context and measure estimation.
Khng KH; Lee K
PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e101356. PubMed ID: 24992683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prepotent motor activity and inhibitory control demands in different variants of the go/no-go paradigm.
Wessel JR
Psychophysiology; 2018 Mar; 55(3):. PubMed ID: 28390090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cognitive and behavioural dispositions in offspring at high risk for alcoholism.
Kumar R; Kumar KJ; Benegal V
Asian J Psychiatr; 2018 Jun; 35():38-44. PubMed ID: 29775836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impulsivity in adult ADHD patients with and without cocaine dependence.
Crunelle CL; Veltman DJ; van Emmerik-van Oortmerssen K; Booij J; van den Brink W
Drug Alcohol Depend; 2013 Apr; 129(1-2):18-24. PubMed ID: 23026814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Right Superior Frontal Gyrus and Individual Variation in Proactive Control of Impulsive Response.
Hu S; Ide JS; Zhang S; Li CR
J Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 36(50):12688-12696. PubMed ID: 27974616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of sleep loss and circadian rhythm on executive inhibitory control in the Stroop and Simon tasks.
Bratzke D; Steinborn MB; Rolke B; Ulrich R
Chronobiol Int; 2012 Feb; 29(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 22217101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
