251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30343454)
21. Breast cancer molecular subtype classifier that incorporates MRI features.
Sutton EJ; Dashevsky BZ; Oh JH; Veeraraghavan H; Apte AP; Thakur SB; Morris EA; Deasy JO
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jul; 44(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 26756416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Identify the triple-negative and non-triple-negative breast cancer by using texture features of medicale ultrasonic image: A STROBE-compliant study.
Chen Q; Xia J; Zhang J
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Jun; 100(22):e25878. PubMed ID: 34087829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Computer-aided diagnosis for distinguishing between triple-negative breast cancer and fibroadenomas based on ultrasound texture features.
Moon WK; Huang YS; Lo CM; Huang CS; Bae MS; Kim WH; Chen JH; Chang RF
Med Phys; 2015 Jun; 42(6):3024-35. PubMed ID: 26127055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Triple-negative invasive breast carcinoma: the association between the sonographic appearances with clinicopathological feature.
Li JW; Zhang K; Shi ZT; Zhang X; Xie J; Liu JY; Chang C
Sci Rep; 2018 Jun; 8(1):9040. PubMed ID: 29899425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Clinical characteristics comparison between triple-negative and non-triple-negative breast cancer].
Zhang HM; Xuan LX; Gao JD; Zhang BN; Zhao P
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 47(7):506-10. PubMed ID: 19595207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Radiomics of US texture features in differential diagnosis between triple-negative breast cancer and fibroadenoma.
Lee SE; Han K; Kwak JY; Lee E; Kim EK
Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):13546. PubMed ID: 30202040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Magnetic resonance imaging features in triple-negative breast cancer: comparison with luminal and HER2-overexpressing tumors.
Costantini M; Belli P; Distefano D; Bufi E; Matteo MD; Rinaldi P; Giuliani M; Petrone G; Magno S; Bonomo L
Clin Breast Cancer; 2012 Oct; 12(5):331-9. PubMed ID: 23040001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Radiomic analysis on magnetic resonance diffusion weighted image in distinguishing triple-negative breast cancer from other subtypes: a feasibility study.
Wang Q; Mao N; Liu M; Shi Y; Ma H; Dong J; Zhang X; Duan S; Wang B; Xie H
Clin Imaging; 2021 Apr; 72():136-141. PubMed ID: 33242692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. B-Mode Ultrasound Combined with Color Doppler and Strain Elastography in the Diagnosis of Non-mass Breast Lesions: A Prospective Study.
Li L; Zhou X; Zhao X; Hao S; Yao J; Zhong W; Zhi H
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Nov; 43(11):2582-2590. PubMed ID: 28844465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance.
Choi HY; Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):878-886. PubMed ID: 28526455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dual-modal computer-assisted evaluation of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients on both real-time elastography and B-mode ultrasound.
Zhang Q; Suo J; Chang W; Shi J; Chen M
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Oct; 95():66-74. PubMed ID: 28987700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Magnetic Resonance Imaging after Completion of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Can Accurately Discriminate between No Residual Carcinoma and Residual Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
Park S; Yoon JH; Sohn J; Park HS; Moon HJ; Kim MJ; Kim EK; Kim SI; Park BW
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149347. PubMed ID: 26866475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. 1000-Case Reader Study of Radiologists' Performance in Interpretation of Automated Breast Volume Scanner Images with a Computer-Aided Detection System.
Xu X; Bao L; Tan Y; Zhu L; Kong F; Wang W
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1694-1702. PubMed ID: 29853222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Breast Cancer Molecular Subtype Prediction by Mammographic Radiomic Features.
Ma W; Zhao Y; Ji Y; Guo X; Jian X; Liu P; Wu S
Acad Radiol; 2019 Feb; 26(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 29526548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Breast tumor classification using different features of quantitative ultrasound parametric images.
Hsu SM; Kuo WH; Kuo FC; Liao YY
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2019 Apr; 14(4):623-633. PubMed ID: 30617720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Association between MRI Features and Standardized Uptake Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
Choi BB; Lee JS; Kim KH
Oncol Res Treat; 2018; 41(11):706-711. PubMed ID: 30321870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Does the subtype of breast cancer affect the diagnostic performance of axillary ultrasound for nodal staging in breast cancer patients?
Vane MLG; van Nijnatten TJA; Nelemans PJ; Lobbes MBI; van Roozendaal LM; Kooreman LFS; Keymeulen KBMI; Smidt ML; Schipper RJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Apr; 45(4):573-577. PubMed ID: 30732971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. MR imaging features of triple-negative breast cancers.
Sung JS; Jochelson MS; Brennan S; Joo S; Wen YH; Moskowitz C; Zheng J; Dershaw DD; Morris EA
Breast J; 2013; 19(6):643-9. PubMed ID: 24015869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The value of prognostic ultrasound features of breast cancer in different molecular subtypes with a focus on triple negative disease.
Evans A; Sim YT; Lawson B; Macaskill J; Jordan L; Thompson A
Breast Cancer; 2022 Mar; 29(2):296-301. PubMed ID: 34780035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A pilot study of radiomics technology based on X-ray mammography in patients with triple-negative breast cancer.
Zhang HX; Sun ZQ; Cheng YG; Mao GQ
J Xray Sci Technol; 2019; 27(3):485-492. PubMed ID: 31081797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
