197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30343619)
1. Reliability and validity of the iSense optical scanner for measuring volume of transtibial residual limb models.
Armitage L; Kwah LK; Kark L
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Apr; 43(2):213-220. PubMed ID: 30343619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity and reliability of a novel 3D scanner for assessment of the shape and volume of amputees' residual limb models.
Seminati E; Canepa Talamas D; Young M; Twiste M; Dhokia V; Bilzon JLJ
PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184498. PubMed ID: 28886154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability and Validity of Measurement Tools for Residual Limb Volume in People With Limb Amputations: A Systematic Review.
Armitage L; Kark L; Czerniec S; Kwah LK
Phys Ther; 2019 May; 99(5):612-626. PubMed ID: 30722026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of three different methods for assessing amputee residuum shape and volume: 3D scanners vs. circumferential measurements.
Seminati E; Young M; Canepa Talamas D; Twiste M; Dhokia V; Bilzon J
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Aug; 46(4):327-334. PubMed ID: 35320149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measurement properties and usability of non-contact scanners for measuring transtibial residual limb volume.
Kofman R; Beekman AM; Emmelot CH; Geertzen JHB; Dijkstra PU
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Jun; 42(3):280-287. PubMed ID: 29113533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility and validity of an indirect volume measurement in transtibial amputees.
van Stuivenberg-Vrielink C; de Laat F; Meijer R; van Kuijk A
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2010 Mar; 34(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 20196686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of one-repetition maximum performance in people with chronic heart failure.
Ellis R; Holland AE; Dodd K; Shields N
Disabil Rehabil; 2019 Jul; 41(14):1706-1710. PubMed ID: 29478356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical usability, reliability, and repeatability of noncontact scanners in measuring residual limb volume in persons with transtibial amputation.
Kofman R; Winter RE; Emmelot CH; Geertzen JH; Dijkstra PU
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Apr; 46(2):164-169. PubMed ID: 34932511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating the Reliability of a Shape Capturing Process for Transradial Residual Limb Using a Non-Contact Scanner.
Ngan CC; Sivasambu H; Ramdial S; Andrysek J
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(18):. PubMed ID: 36146212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Registering methodology for imaging and analysis of residual-limb shape after transtibial amputation.
Dickinson AS; Steer JW; Woods CJ; Worsley PR
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2016; 53(2):207-18. PubMed ID: 27148905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing mobility for persons with lower limb amputation: the Figure-of-Eight Walk Test with the inclusion of two novel conditions.
Schack J; Mirtaheri P; Steen H; Gjøvaag T
Disabil Rehabil; 2021 May; 43(9):1323-1332. PubMed ID: 31526078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Component Timed-Up-and-Go test: the utility and psychometric properties of using a mobile application to determine prosthetic mobility in people with lower limb amputations.
Clemens SM; Gailey RS; Bennett CL; Pasquina PF; Kirk-Sanchez NJ; Gaunaurd IA
Clin Rehabil; 2018 Mar; 32(3):388-397. PubMed ID: 28862042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The iPhone Measure app level function as a measuring device for the weight bearing lunge test in adults: a reliability study.
Banwell HA; Uden H; Marshall N; Altmann C; Williams CM
J Foot Ankle Res; 2019; 12():37. PubMed ID: 31333763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity and reliability of a new ankle dorsiflexion measurement device.
Gatt A; Chockalingam N
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2013 Aug; 37(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 23211471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intra- and Inter-rater Reliability of Navigated Ultrasound in the Assessment of Pelvic Tilt in Symptom-Free Young Adults.
Marques CJ; Martin T; Fiedler F; Weber M; Breul V; Lampe F; Kozak J
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Oct; 37(10):2333-2342. PubMed ID: 29480567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Concurrent validity and reliability of measuring range of motion during the cervical flexion rotation test with a novel digital goniometer.
Luedtke K; Schoettker-Königer T; Hall T; Reimer C; Grassold M; Hasselhoff-Styhler P; Neulinger C; Obrocki M; Przyhoda P; Schäfer A
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Aug; 21(1):535. PubMed ID: 32781990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The reliability and validity of three dimensional ultrasound volumetric measurements using an in vitro balloon and in vivo uterine model.
Farrell T; Leslie JR; Chien PF; Agustsson P
BJOG; 2001 Jun; 108(6):573-82. PubMed ID: 11426890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity and Reliability of Two Digital Wound Measurement Tools after Surgery in Patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa.
Aarts P; van Huijstee JC; Ragamin A; Reeves JL; van Montfrans C; van der Zee HH; Prens EP
Dermatology; 2023; 239(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 35998557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity and reliability of using photography for measuring knee range of motion: a methodological study.
Naylor JM; Ko V; Adie S; Gaskin C; Walker R; Harris IA; Mittal R
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2011 Apr; 12():77. PubMed ID: 21496347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability and concurrent validity of the iPhone
Furness J; Schram B; Cox AJ; Anderson SL; Keogh J
PeerJ; 2018; 6():e4431. PubMed ID: 29568701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
