These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30343740)

  • 21. Strategies for enhancing the accuracy of evaluation and sustainability performance of building.
    Hossain MU; Ng ST
    J Environ Manage; 2020 May; 261():110230. PubMed ID: 32148300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Value stream mapping for identification and assessment of material waste in construction: A case study.
    Vilventhan A; Ram VG; Sugumaran S
    Waste Manag Res; 2019 Aug; 37(8):815-825. PubMed ID: 31213142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Indicators to assess the recovery of natural resources contained in demolition waste.
    Roussat N; Méhu J; Dujet C
    Waste Manag Res; 2009 Mar; 27(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 19244415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Life cycle assessment of the end-of-life phase of a residential building.
    Vitale P; Arena N; Di Gregorio F; Arena U
    Waste Manag; 2017 Feb; 60():311-321. PubMed ID: 27742229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluating environmental impacts of alternative construction waste management approaches using supply-chain-linked life-cycle analysis.
    Kucukvar M; Egilmez G; Tatari O
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Jun; 32(6):500-8. PubMed ID: 24855225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What are we discarding during the life cycle of a building? Case studies of social housing in Andalusia, Spain.
    Marrero M; Rivero-Camacho C; Alba-Rodríguez MD
    Waste Manag; 2020 Feb; 102():391-403. PubMed ID: 31733563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Effects of Data Collection Method and Monitoring of Workers' Behavior on the Generation of Demolition Waste.
    Cha GW; Kim YC; Moon HJ; Hong WH
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Oct; 14(10):. PubMed ID: 29023378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effectiveness of Hong Kong's Construction Waste Disposal Charging Scheme.
    Hao JL; Hills MJ; Tam VW
    Waste Manag Res; 2008 Dec; 26(6):553-8. PubMed ID: 19039072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An estimation framework for building information modeling (BIM)-based demolition waste by type.
    Kim YC; Hong WH; Park JW; Cha GW
    Waste Manag Res; 2017 Dec; 35(12):1285-1295. PubMed ID: 29076777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An empirical investigation of construction and demolition waste generation rates in Shenzhen city, South China.
    Lu W; Yuan H; Li J; Hao JJ; Mi X; Ding Z
    Waste Manag; 2011 Apr; 31(4):680-7. PubMed ID: 21208794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Development and validation of a building design waste reduction model.
    Llatas C; Osmani M
    Waste Manag; 2016 Oct; 56():318-36. PubMed ID: 27292581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of different building shells - life cycle assessment.
    Rixrath D; Wartha C
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2016 Jul; 12(3):437-44. PubMed ID: 27332927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Estimation of building-related construction and demolition waste in Shanghai.
    Ding T; Xiao J
    Waste Manag; 2014 Nov; 34(11):2327-34. PubMed ID: 25164857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The S-curve for forecasting waste generation in construction projects.
    Lu W; Peng Y; Chen X; Skitmore M; Zhang X
    Waste Manag; 2016 Oct; 56():23-34. PubMed ID: 27485070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On the prevailing construction waste recycling practices: a South East Queensland study.
    Tam VW; Kotrayothar D; Loo YC
    Waste Manag Res; 2009 Mar; 27(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 19244416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Critical management practices influencing on-site waste minimization in construction projects.
    Ajayi SO; Oyedele LO; Bilal M; Akinade OO; Alaka HA; Owolabi HA
    Waste Manag; 2017 Jan; 59():330-339. PubMed ID: 27839690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Environmental management of construction and demolition waste in Kuwait.
    Kartam N; Al-Mutairi N; Al-Ghusain I; Al-Humoud J
    Waste Manag; 2004; 24(10):1049-59. PubMed ID: 15567670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An empirical study of construction and demolition waste generation and implication of recycling.
    Islam R; Nazifa TH; Yuniarto A; Shanawaz Uddin ASM; Salmiati S; Shahid S
    Waste Manag; 2019 Jul; 95():10-21. PubMed ID: 31351595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A Spanish model for quantification and management of construction waste.
    Solís-Guzmán J; Marrero M; Montes-Delgado MV; Ramírez-de-Arellano A
    Waste Manag; 2009 Sep; 29(9):2542-8. PubMed ID: 19523801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Distribution of materials in construction and demolition waste in Portugal.
    Coelho A; de Brito J
    Waste Manag Res; 2011 Aug; 29(8):843-53. PubMed ID: 20498131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.