These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30345554)
21. Applied comparison of large-scale propensity score matching and cardinality matching for causal inference in observational research. Fortin SP; Johnston SS; Schuemie MJ BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 May; 21(1):109. PubMed ID: 34030640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Simultaneous record linkage and causal inference with propensity score subclassification. Wortman JH; Reiter JP Stat Med; 2018 Oct; 37(24):3533-3546. PubMed ID: 30069901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Estimation of average treatment effect based on a multi-index propensity score. Xu J; Wei K; Wang C; Huang C; Xue Y; Zhang R; Qin G; Yu Y BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):337. PubMed ID: 36577950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of methods for handling covariate missingness in propensity score estimation with a binary exposure. Coffman DL; Zhou J; Cai X BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):168. PubMed ID: 32586271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Marginal mean weighting through stratification: a generalized method for evaluating multivalued and multiple treatments with nonexperimental data. Hong G Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):44-60. PubMed ID: 21843003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clarifying selection bias in cluster randomized trials. Li F; Tian Z; Bobb J; Papadogeorgou G; Li F Clin Trials; 2022 Feb; 19(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 34894795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Estimating propensity scores with missing covariate data using general location mixture models. Mitra R; Reiter JP Stat Med; 2011 Mar; 30(6):627-41. PubMed ID: 21337358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Relaxed covariate overlap and margin-based causal effect estimation. Ghosh D Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(28):4252-4265. PubMed ID: 30168168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. On the use and misuse of scalar scores of confounders in design and analysis of observational studies. Pfeiffer RM; Riedl R Stat Med; 2015 Aug; 34(18):2618-35. PubMed ID: 25781579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Propensity scores based methods for estimating average treatment effect and average treatment effect among treated: A comparative study. Abdia Y; Kulasekera KB; Datta S; Boakye M; Kong M Biom J; 2017 Sep; 59(5):967-985. PubMed ID: 28436047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Controlling for confounding via propensity score methods can result in biased estimation of the conditional AUC: A simulation study. Galadima HI; McClish DK Pharm Stat; 2019 Oct; 18(5):568-582. PubMed ID: 31111682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Subgroup balancing propensity score. Dong J; Zhang JL; Zeng S; Li F Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Mar; 29(3):659-676. PubMed ID: 31456486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Bayesian Approach for Addressing Differential Covariate Measurement Error in Propensity Score Methods. Hong H; Rudolph KE; Stuart EA Psychometrika; 2017 Dec; 82(4):1078-1096. PubMed ID: 27738956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Prognostic score-based balance measures can be a useful diagnostic for propensity score methods in comparative effectiveness research. Stuart EA; Lee BK; Leacy FP J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8 Suppl):S84-S90.e1. PubMed ID: 23849158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impact Evaluation Using Analysis of Covariance With Error-Prone Covariates That Violate Surrogacy. Lockwood JR; McCaffrey DF Eval Rev; 2019 Dec; 43(6):335-369. PubMed ID: 31578089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Using classification tree analysis to generate propensity score weights. Linden A; Yarnold PR J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):703-712. PubMed ID: 28371206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Correcting for Measurement Error in Time-Varying Covariates in Marginal Structural Models. Kyle RP; Moodie EE; Klein MB; Abrahamowicz M Am J Epidemiol; 2016 Aug; 184(3):249-58. PubMed ID: 27416840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Propensity score specification for optimal estimation of average treatment effect with binary response. Craycroft JA; Huang J; Kong M Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Dec; 29(12):3623-3640. PubMed ID: 32640934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Double-adjustment in propensity score matching analysis: choosing a threshold for considering residual imbalance. Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Daurès JP; Devereaux PJ; Landais P; Le Manach Y BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):78. PubMed ID: 28454568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]