These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30345948)

  • 1. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A REVIEW OF CHARACTERISTICS AND APPLIED METHODS.
    Luhnen M; Prediger B; Neugebauer EAM; Mathes T
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2018 Jan; 34(6):537-546. PubMed ID: 30345948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic reviews of health economic evaluations: A structured analysis of characteristics and methods applied.
    Luhnen M; Prediger B; Neugebauer EAM; Mathes T
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):195-206. PubMed ID: 30761762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic reviews of health economic evaluations: a protocol for a systematic review of characteristics and methods applied.
    Luhnen M; Prediger B; Neugebauer EAM; Mathes T
    Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):238. PubMed ID: 29197411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing transferability in systematic reviews of health economic evaluations - a review of methodological guidance.
    Weise A; Büchter RB; Pieper D; Mathes T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Feb; 22(1):52. PubMed ID: 35184733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS: HOW EXTENSIVE ARE THEIR SEARCHES?
    Wood H; Arber M; Glanville JM
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 28343452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methods for systematic reviews of health economic evaluations: a systematic review, comparison, and synthesis of method literature.
    Mathes T; Walgenbach M; Antoine SL; Pieper D; Eikermann M
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Oct; 34(7):826-40. PubMed ID: 24713694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing context suitability (generalizability, external validity, applicability or transferability) of findings in evidence syntheses in healthcare-An integrative review of methodological guidance.
    Weise A; Büchter R; Pieper D; Mathes T
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):760-779. PubMed ID: 32920989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Health Technology Assessment of Public Health Interventions Published 2012 to 2016: An Analysis of Characteristics and Comparison of Methods.
    Polus S; Mathes T; Klingler C; Messer M; Gerhardus A; Stegbauer C; Willms G; Ehrenreich H; Marckmann G; Pieper D
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2019; 35(4):280-290. PubMed ID: 31337450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the capacity of Ghana to introduce health technology assessment: a systematic review of economic evaluations conducted in Ghana.
    Addo R; Goodall S; Hall J; Haas M
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2020 Oct; 36(5):500-507. PubMed ID: 32981532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Economic evaluations conducted by Canadian health technology assessment agencies: where do we stand?
    Tarride JE; McCarron CE; Lim M; Bowen JM; Blackhouse G; Hopkins R; O'Reilly D; Xie F; Goeree R
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):437-44. PubMed ID: 18828938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methods of international health technology assessment agencies for economic evaluations--a comparative analysis.
    Mathes T; Jacobs E; Morfeld JC; Pieper D
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2013 Sep; 13():371. PubMed ID: 24079858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are adverse effects incorporated in economic models? An initial review of current practice.
    Craig D; McDaid C; Fonseca T; Stock C; Duffy S; Woolacott N
    Health Technol Assess; 2009 Dec; 13(62):1-71, 97-181, iii. PubMed ID: 20018146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Considerations for transferability of health technology assessments: a scoping review of tools, methods, and practices.
    Heupink LF; Peacocke EF; Sæterdal I; Chola L; Frønsdal K
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2022 Nov; 38(1):e78. PubMed ID: 36321421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Guidance on review type selection for health technology assessments: key factors and considerations for deciding when to conduct a de novo systematic review, an update of a systematic review, or an overview of systematic reviews.
    Kim JSM; Pollock M; Kaunelis D; Weeks L
    Syst Rev; 2022 Sep; 11(1):206. PubMed ID: 36167611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nature and reporting characteristics of UK health technology assessment systematic reviews.
    Carroll C; Kaltenthaler E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):35. PubMed ID: 29739352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Picot J; Jones J; Colquitt JL; Gospodarevskaya E; Loveman E; Baxter L; Clegg AJ
    Health Technol Assess; 2009 Sep; 13(41):1-190, 215-357, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 19726018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of surrogate outcomes in model-based cost-effectiveness analyses: a survey of UK Health Technology Assessment reports.
    Taylor RS; Elston J
    Health Technol Assess; 2009 Jan; 13(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-50. PubMed ID: 19203465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT EVIDENCE ON E-HEALTH/M-HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES: EVALUATING THE TRANSPARENCY AND THOROUGHNESS.
    Vukovic V; Favaretti C; Ricciardi W; de Waure C
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2018 Jan; 34(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 29455685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of health technology assessment reports on decision making in Austria.
    Zechmeister I; Schumacher I
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2012 Jan; 28(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 22233544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.