These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30346211)

  • 21. Top-down engagement modulates the neural expressions of visual expertise.
    Harel A; Gilaie-Dotan S; Malach R; Bentin S
    Cereb Cortex; 2010 Oct; 20(10):2304-18. PubMed ID: 20133358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How to say no in recognition tests of visual working memory: Testing unidimensional and two-dimensional models with continuous or discrete memory states.
    Lin HY; Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2123-2146. PubMed ID: 30883171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Association and dissociation between detection and discrimination of objects of expertise: Evidence from visual search.
    Golan T; Bentin S; DeGutis JM; Robertson LC; Harel A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Feb; 76(2):391-406. PubMed ID: 24338355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Retrieval dynamics of recognition and rejection.
    Papesh MH; Hicks JL; Guevara Pinto JD
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Sep; 72(9):2328-2341. PubMed ID: 30808272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The fast-same effect of an exclusive-OR task.
    Goulet MA; Cousineau D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Sep; 46(9):991-1000. PubMed ID: 32551731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Visual working memory for letters varies with familiarity but not complexity.
    Ngiam WXQ; Khaw KLC; Holcombe AO; Goodbourn PT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1761-1775. PubMed ID: 30589333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Domain-general and domain-specific neural changes underlying visual expertise.
    Martens F; Bulthé J; van Vliet C; Op de Beeck H
    Neuroimage; 2018 Apr; 169():80-93. PubMed ID: 29223739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Working memory load and the retro-cue effect: A diffusion model account.
    Shepherdson P; Oberauer K; Souza AS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Feb; 44(2):286-310. PubMed ID: 28557495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Visual recognition memory for scenes in aerial photographs: Exploring the role of expertise.
    Šikl R; Svatoňová H; Děchtěrenko F; Urbánek T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jun; 197():23-31. PubMed ID: 31077995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Disentangling the contributions of grasp and action representations in the recognition of manipulable objects.
    McNair NA; Harris IM
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Jul; 220(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 22609901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Development of an "object category recognition" task for mice: Involvement of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors.
    Creighton SD; Collett HA; Zonneveld PM; Pandit RA; Huff AE; Jardine KH; McNaughton BL; Winters BD
    Behav Neurosci; 2019 Oct; 133(5):527-536. PubMed ID: 31246078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Asymmetric Compression of Representational Space for Object Animacy Categorization under Degraded Viewing Conditions.
    Grootswagers T; Ritchie JB; Wardle SG; Heathcote A; Carlson TA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Dec; 29(12):1995-2010. PubMed ID: 28820673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Interference in character processing reflects common perceptual expertise across writing systems.
    Wong AC; Qu Z; McGugin RW; Gauthier I
    J Vis; 2011 Jan; 11(1):15. PubMed ID: 21245276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Repetition strengthens target recognition but impairs similar lure discrimination: evidence for trace competition.
    Reagh ZM; Yassa MA
    Learn Mem; 2014 Jul; 21(7):342-6. PubMed ID: 24934334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Retrieving object color: the influence of color congruity and test format.
    Cycowicz YM; Nessler D; Horton C; Friedman D
    Neuroreport; 2008 Sep; 19(14):1387-90. PubMed ID: 18766017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Control of memory retrieval alters memory-based eye movements.
    Kulkarni M; Nickel AE; Minor GN; Hannula DE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Aug; 50(8):1199-1219. PubMed ID: 38127492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Are Face and Object Recognition Independent? A Neurocomputational Modeling Exploration.
    Wang P; Gauthier I; Cottrell G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 28(4):558-74. PubMed ID: 26741802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Electrophysiological correlates of the drift diffusion model in visual word recognition.
    Mueller CJ; White CN; Kuchinke L
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Nov; 38(11):5616-5627. PubMed ID: 28758287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The relative importance of perceptual and memory sampling processes in determining the time course of absolute identification.
    Guest D; Kent C; Adelman JS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(4):615-630. PubMed ID: 28967762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Faster recognition of graspable targets defined by orientation in a visual search task.
    Bamford LE; Klassen NR; Karl JM
    Exp Brain Res; 2020 Apr; 238(4):905-916. PubMed ID: 32170332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.