These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30346675)

  • 1. The ability of marginal detection using different intraoral scanning systems: A pilot randomized controlled trial.
    Ferrari M; Keeling A; Mandelli F; Lo Giudice G; Garcia-Godoy F; Joda T
    Am J Dent; 2018 Oct; 31(5):272-276. PubMed ID: 30346675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of The Reproducibility of Subgingival Vertical Margins Using Intraoral Optical Scanning (IOS): A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.
    Ferrari Cagidiaco E; Zarone F; Discepoli N; Joda T; Ferrari M
    J Clin Med; 2021 Mar; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 33804358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional differences between intraoral scans and conventional impressions of edentulous jaws: A clinical study.
    Lo Russo L; Caradonna G; Troiano G; Salamini A; Guida L; Ciavarella D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):264-268. PubMed ID: 31153614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining dental impressions.
    Carbajal Mejía JB; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T; Yatani H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):392-399. PubMed ID: 28222873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of Tooth Preparation Design and Scan Angulations on the Accuracy of Two Intraoral Digital Scanners: An in Vitro Study Based on 3-Dimensional Comparisons.
    Ammoun R; Suprono MS; Goodacre CJ; Oyoyo U; Carrico CK; Kattadiyil MT
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Mar; 29(3):201-206. PubMed ID: 31994818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of printed casts generated from digital implant impressions versus stone casts from conventional implant impressions: A comparative in vitro study.
    Alshawaf B; Weber HP; Finkelman M; El Rafie K; Kudara Y; Papaspyridakos P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Aug; 29(8):835-842. PubMed ID: 29926977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Confounding factors affecting the marginal quality of an intra-oral scan.
    Keeling A; Wu J; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2017 Apr; 59():33-40. PubMed ID: 28189718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Finish line distinctness and accuracy in 7 intraoral scanners versus conventional impression: an in vitro descriptive comparison.
    Nedelcu R; Olsson P; Nyström I; Thor A
    BMC Oral Health; 2018 Feb; 18(1):27. PubMed ID: 29471825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interproximal distance analysis of stereolithographic casts made by CAD-CAM technology: An in vitro study.
    Hoffman M; Cho SH; Bansal NK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Nov; 118(5):624-630. PubMed ID: 28477918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An Experimental Strategy for Capturing the Margins of Prepared Single Teeth with an Intraoral Scanner: A Prospective Clinical Study on 30 Patients.
    Mangano FG; Margiani B; Solop I; Latuta N; Admakin O
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jan; 17(2):. PubMed ID: 31936096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An In Vitro Comparison of the Marginal Adaptation Accuracy of CAD/CAM Restorations Using Different Impression Systems.
    Shembesh M; Ali A; Finkelman M; Weber HP; Zandparsa R
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):581-586. PubMed ID: 26855068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of digital models generated by conventional impression/plaster-model methods and intraoral scanning.
    Tomita Y; Uechi J; Konno M; Sasamoto S; Iijima M; Mizoguchi I
    Dent Mater J; 2018 Jul; 37(4):628-633. PubMed ID: 29669951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of conventional and digital intraoral impressions on the fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated all-ceramic crowns.
    Berrendero S; Salido MP; Valverde A; Ferreiroa A; Pradíes G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Dec; 20(9):2403-2410. PubMed ID: 26800669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners: A Systematic Review of Influencing Factors.
    Abduo J; Elseyoufi M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2018 Aug; 26(3):101-121. PubMed ID: 29989757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions.
    Zarauz C; Valverde A; Martinez-Rus F; Hassan B; Pradies G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 May; 20(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 26362778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses made with either a conventional or digital impression.
    Su TS; Sun J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 27061628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital scanning procedures.
    Lee B; Oh KC; Haam D; Lee JH; Moon HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 29428522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of Preparation Design, Marginal Gingiva Location, and Tooth Morphology on the Accuracy of Digital Impressions for Full-Crown Restorations: An In Vitro Investigation.
    Bernauer SA; Müller J; Zitzmann NU; Joda T
    J Clin Med; 2020 Dec; 9(12):. PubMed ID: 33316958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of age and scanning system on the learning curve of experienced and novel intraoral scanner operators: A multi-centric clinical trial.
    Zarauz C; Sailer I; Pitta J; Robles-Medina M; Hussein AA; Pradíes G
    J Dent; 2021 Dec; 115():103860. PubMed ID: 34715248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.