These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30347321)

  • 1. The kinematics that you do not expect: Integrating prior information and kinematics to understand intentions.
    Koul A; Soriano M; Tversky B; Becchio C; Cavallo A
    Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():213-219. PubMed ID: 30347321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contextual expectations shape the motor coding of movement kinematics during the prediction of observed actions: A TMS study.
    Bianco V; Finisguerra A; D'Argenio G; Boscarol S; Urgesi C
    Neuroimage; 2024 Aug; 297():120702. PubMed ID: 38909762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Equal kinematics and visual context but different purposes: Observer's moral rules modulate motor resonance.
    Craighero L; Mele S
    Cortex; 2018 Jul; 104():1-11. PubMed ID: 29715581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Movement kinematics drive chain selection toward intention detection.
    Soriano M; Cavallo A; D'Ausilio A; Becchio C; Fadiga L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Oct; 115(41):10452-10457. PubMed ID: 30242132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changing ideas about others' intentions: updating prior expectations tunes activity in the human motor system.
    Jacquet PO; Roy AC; Chambon V; Borghi AM; Salemme R; Farnè A; Reilly KT
    Sci Rep; 2016 May; 6():26995. PubMed ID: 27243157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shaping of Reach-to-Grasp Kinematics by Intentions: A Meta-Analysis.
    Egmose I; Køppe S
    J Mot Behav; 2018; 50(2):155-165. PubMed ID: 28644719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Action Observation Areas Represent Intentions From Subtle Kinematic Features.
    Koul A; Cavallo A; Cauda F; Costa T; Diano M; Pontil M; Becchio C
    Cereb Cortex; 2018 Jul; 28(7):2647-2654. PubMed ID: 29722797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adults Do Not Distinguish Action Intentions Based on Movement Kinematics Presented in Naturalistic Settings.
    Rutkowska JM; Meyer M; Hunnius S
    Brain Sci; 2021 Jun; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 34205675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictable real-time constraints reveal anticipatory strategies of coupled planning in a sequential pick and place task.
    Lewkowicz D; Delevoye-Turrell YN
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Apr; 73(4):594-616. PubMed ID: 31662036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. You said you would! The predictability of other's behavior from their intentions determines predictive biases in action perception.
    Hudson M; Bach P; Nicholson T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Feb; 44(2):320-335. PubMed ID: 28557497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identifying others' informative intentions from movement kinematics.
    McEllin L; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    Cognition; 2018 Nov; 180():246-258. PubMed ID: 30096482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dissociated Representations of Deceptive Intentions and Kinematic Adaptations in the Observer's Motor System.
    Finisguerra A; Amoruso L; Makris S; Urgesi C
    Cereb Cortex; 2018 Jan; 28(1):33-47. PubMed ID: 29253254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Facilitation effect of observed motor deviants in a cooperative motor task: Evidence for direct perception of social intention in action.
    Quesque F; Delevoye-Turrell Y; Coello Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(8):1451-63. PubMed ID: 26288247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Observer-Agent Kinematic Similarity Facilitates Action Intention Decoding.
    De Marco D; Scalona E; Bazzini MC; Avanzini P; Fabbri-Destro M
    Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2605. PubMed ID: 32054915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Observed reach trajectory influences executed reach kinematics in prehension.
    Hardwick RM; Edwards MG
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1082-93. PubMed ID: 21287427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Emergence of anticipatory actions in a novel task.
    Herbort O; Kunde W
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Jun; 237(6):1421-1430. PubMed ID: 30888459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What are they up to? The role of sensory evidence and prior knowledge in action understanding.
    Chambon V; Domenech P; Pacherie E; Koechlin E; Baraduc P; Farrer C
    PLoS One; 2011 Feb; 6(2):e17133. PubMed ID: 21364992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of task difficulty on gaze behavior in a sequential object manipulation task.
    Kurz J; Hegele M; Reiser M; Munzert J
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Nov; 235(11):3479-3486. PubMed ID: 28840269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A diffusion model analysis of the response-effect compatibility effect.
    Janczyk M; Lerche V
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Feb; 148(2):237-251. PubMed ID: 29847981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experts integrate explicit contextual priors and environmental information to improve anticipation efficiency.
    Gredin NV; Bishop DT; Broadbent DP; Tucker A; Williams AM
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Dec; 24(4):509-520. PubMed ID: 30024211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.