These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30349780)

  • 1. Functional and Aesthetic Factors Associated with Revision of Rhinoplasty.
    Bouaoud J; Loustau M; Belloc JB
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2018 Sep; 6(9):e1884. PubMed ID: 30349780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Shaved Cartilage Gel Versus Diced Cartilage on Final Dorsal Camouflage: Prospective Study of 200 Patients.
    Santos M; Ribeiro A; Almeida E Sousa C; Santos J; Dourado N; Amarante J; Gonçalves Ferreira M
    Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med; 2021; 23(3):164-171. PubMed ID: 32721239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Current clinical practices of the Rhinoplasty Society members.
    Lee M; Unger JG; Gryskiewicz J; Rohrich RJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(5):453-5. PubMed ID: 23511747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcomes of a Treatment Protocol for Compromised Nasal Skin in Primary and Revision Open Rhinoplasty.
    Irvine LE; Azizzadeh B; Kerulos JL; Nassif PS
    Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med; 2021; 23(2):118-125. PubMed ID: 33054380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An analysis of 101 primary cosmetic rhinoplasties.
    Bagheri SC; Khan HA; Jahangirnia A; Rad SS; Mortazavi H
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):902-9. PubMed ID: 21684661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Effectiveness of Skeletal Reconstruction in Severe Post-Rhinoplasty Nasal Deformity.
    Sazgar AA; Hajialipour S; Razfar A; Rahavi-Ezabadi S
    Aesthet Surg J; 2021 Jul; 41(8):905-918. PubMed ID: 33506865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Introduction of a Less Invasive Revision Rhinoplasty Using Closed Nasal Chondrotome.
    Manafi A; Hamedi ZS; Manfai F
    World J Plast Surg; 2019 Jan; 8(1):108-111. PubMed ID: 30873371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The epidemiology of autologous tissue grafting in primary and revision rhinoplasty.
    Lee LN; Quatela O; Bhattacharyya N
    Laryngoscope; 2019 Jul; 129(7):1549-1553. PubMed ID: 30408189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revision Rhinoplasty after Open Rhinoplasty: Lessons from 252 Cases and Analysis of Risk Factors.
    Sibar S; Findikcioglu K; Pasinlioglu B
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Oct; 148(4):747-757. PubMed ID: 34550928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of Mastoid Periosteum Graft in Primary and Revision Rhinoplasty.
    Yi JS; Jin HR
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2019 Oct; 43(5):1295-1300. PubMed ID: 31139910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Primary and Revision Rhinoplasty: A Single Surgeon Experience and Patient Satisfaction.
    Suresh R; Doval AF; Newstrom E; Pham T; Alford EL
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2021 Sep; 9(9):e3798. PubMed ID: 34522571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment outcomes of extracorporeal septoplasty compared with in situ septal correction in rhinoplasty.
    Lee SB; Jang YJ
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2014; 16(5):328-34. PubMed ID: 25079613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical Practice Guideline: Improving Nasal Form and Function after Rhinoplasty.
    Ishii LE; Tollefson TT; Basura GJ; Rosenfeld RM; Abramson PJ; Chaiet SR; Davis KS; Doghramji K; Farrior EH; Finestone SA; Ishman SL; Murphy RX; Park JG; Setzen M; Strike DJ; Walsh SA; Warner JP; Nnacheta LC
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Feb; 156(2_suppl):S1-S30. PubMed ID: 28145823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revision rhinoplasty: measurement of patient-reported outcomes and analysis of predictive factors.
    Abbas OL
    Springerplus; 2016; 5(1):1472. PubMed ID: 27652047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical Practice Guideline: Improving Nasal Form and Function after Rhinoplasty Executive Summary.
    Ishii LE; Tollefson TT; Basura GJ; Rosenfeld RM; Abramson PJ; Chaiet SR; Davis KS; Doghramji K; Farrior EH; Finestone SA; Ishman SL; Murphy RX; Park JG; Setzen M; Strike DJ; Walsh SA; Warner JP; Nnacheta LC
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Feb; 156(2):205-219. PubMed ID: 28145848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Grafting in revision rhinoplasty.
    Bussi M; Palonta F; Toma S
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2013 Jun; 33(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 23853414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dorsal Preservation: The Push Down Technique Reassessed.
    Saban Y; Daniel RK; Polselli R; Trapasso M; Palhazi P
    Aesthet Surg J; 2018 Feb; 38(2):117-131. PubMed ID: 29319787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cosmetic rhinoplasty: revision rates revisited.
    Neaman KC; Boettcher AK; Do VH; Mulder C; Baca M; Renucci JD; VanderWoude DL
    Aesthet Surg J; 2013 Jan; 33(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 23277618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term patient satisfaction after revision rhinoplasty.
    Hellings PW; Nolst Trenité GJ
    Laryngoscope; 2007 Jun; 117(6):985-9. PubMed ID: 17460577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative Outcomes in Functional Rhinoplasty With Open vs Endonasal Spreader Graft Placement.
    Talmadge J; High R; Heckman WW
    Ann Plast Surg; 2018 May; 80(5):468-471. PubMed ID: 29537996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.