These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30350024)

  • 1. Robust maximum marginal likelihood (RMML) estimation for item response theory models.
    Hong MR; Cheng Y
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):573-588. PubMed ID: 30350024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Careless responding in internet-based quality of life assessments.
    Schneider S; May M; Stone AA
    Qual Life Res; 2018 Apr; 27(4):1077-1088. PubMed ID: 29248996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of careless responding on the fit of confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory models.
    Voss NM
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Feb; 56(2):577-599. PubMed ID: 36737580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times.
    Glas CA; van der Linden WJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):603-26. PubMed ID: 20109271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing item fit for unidimensional item response theory models using residuals from estimated item response functions.
    Haberman SJ; Sinharay S; Chon KH
    Psychometrika; 2013 Jul; 78(3):417-40. PubMed ID: 25106393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Score-Based Tests of Differential Item Functioning via Pairwise Maximum Likelihood Estimation.
    Wang T; Strobl C; Zeileis A; Merkle EC
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):132-155. PubMed ID: 29150815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robustness of the performance of the optimized hierarchical two-parameter logistic IRT model for small-sample item calibration.
    König C; Spoden C; Frey A
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Dec; 55(8):3965-3983. PubMed ID: 36333627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Power Analysis for the Wald, LR, Score, and Gradient Tests in a Marginal Maximum Likelihood Framework: Applications in IRT.
    Zimmer F; Draxler C; Debelak R
    Psychometrika; 2023 Dec; 88(4):1249-1298. PubMed ID: 36029390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnosing item score patterns on a test using item response theory-based person-fit statistics.
    Meijer RR
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Mar; 8(1):72-87. PubMed ID: 12741674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The construction and implementation of user-defined fit tests for use with marginal maximum likelihood estimation and generalized item response models.
    Adams RJ; Wu ML
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):355-70. PubMed ID: 19934525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maximum Marginal Likelihood Estimation of a Monotonic Polynomial Generalized Partial Credit Model with Applications to Multiple Group Analysis.
    Falk CF; Cai L
    Psychometrika; 2016 Jun; 81(2):434-60. PubMed ID: 25487423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficient Standard Error Formulas of Ability Estimators with Dichotomous Item Response Models.
    Magis D
    Psychometrika; 2016 Mar; 81(1):184-200. PubMed ID: 25691364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On Latent Trait Estimation in Multidimensional Compensatory Item Response Models.
    Wang C
    Psychometrika; 2015 Jun; 80(2):428-49. PubMed ID: 24604245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using classical test theory, item response theory, and Rasch measurement theory to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures: a comparison of worked examples.
    Petrillo J; Cano SJ; McLeod LD; Coon CD
    Value Health; 2015 Jan; 18(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 25595231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using Mokken scaling techniques to explore carelessness in survey research.
    Wind S; Wang Y
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Oct; 55(7):3370-3415. PubMed ID: 36131197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Limited information estimation of the diffusion-based item response theory model for responses and response times.
    Ranger J; Kuhn JT; Szardenings C
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 May; 69(2):122-38. PubMed ID: 26853083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Information matrix estimation procedures for cognitive diagnostic models.
    Liu Y; Xin T; Andersson B; Tian W
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Feb; 72(1):18-37. PubMed ID: 29508383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Joint Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Diagnostic Classification Models.
    Chiu CY; Köhn HF; Zheng Y; Henson R
    Psychometrika; 2016 Dec; 81(4):1069-1092. PubMed ID: 27734298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the asymptotic standard error of a class of robust estimators of ability in dichotomous item response models.
    Magis D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Nov; 67(3):430-50. PubMed ID: 24016181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Heteroscedastic one-factor models and marginal maximum likelihood estimation.
    Hessen DJ; Dolan CV
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):57-77. PubMed ID: 17935662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.