BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30350105)

  • 21. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies with propensity score-based analysis.
    Zhang XL; Liu RF; Zhang D; Zhang YS; Wang T
    Int J Surg; 2017 Aug; 44():191-203. PubMed ID: 28583897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Critical appraisal of predictive tools to assess the difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review.
    Hallet J; Pessaux P; Beyfuss KA; Jayaraman S; Serrano PE; Martel G; Coburn NG; Piardi T; Mahar AL
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Feb; 33(2):366-376. PubMed ID: 30350105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The external validation of a difficulty scoring system for predicting the risk of intraoperative complications during laparoscopic liver resection.
    Ivanecz A; Plahuta I; Magdalenić T; Mencinger M; Peruš I; Potrč S; Krebs B
    BMC Surg; 2019 Nov; 19(1):179. PubMed ID: 31775813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Validation of a difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection in hepatolithiasis.
    Kim J; Cho JY; Han HS; Yoon YS; Choi Y; Lee JS; Lee B; Kim J
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Mar; 35(3):1148-1155. PubMed ID: 32152674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Validation of the IWATE criteria as a laparoscopic liver resection difficulty score in a single North American cohort.
    Barron JO; Orabi D; Moro A; Quintini C; Berber E; Aucejo FN; Sasaki K; Kwon CD
    Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3601-3609. PubMed ID: 34031739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical Practicality Study of the Difficulty Scoring Systems DSS-B and DSS-ER in Laparoscopic Liver Resection.
    Yang J; Yang Z; Jia G; Xi Y; Xu Y; Li P; Han B; Hu X; Sun C
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Jan; 29(1):12-18. PubMed ID: 30036137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Laparoscopic liver resection: initial experience in a North-African single center.
    Benkabbou A; Souadka A; Serji B; Hachim H; El Malki HO; Mohsine R; Ifrine L; Belkouchi A
    Tunis Med; 2015; 93(8-9):523-6. PubMed ID: 26815517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dissemination of Minimally Invasive Liver Resection for Primary Malignancy: Reevaluating Effectiveness.
    Varley PR; Tohme ST; Chidi AP; Goswami J; van der Windt D; Geller DA; Tsung A
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Mar; 25(3):808-817. PubMed ID: 29302818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Are the current difficulty scores for laparoscopic liver surgery telling the whole story? An international survey and recommendations for the future.
    Halls MC; Cherqui D; Taylor MA; Primrose JN; Abu Hilal M;
    HPB (Oxford); 2018 Mar; 20(3):231-236. PubMed ID: 28969960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Personalizing prognosis in colorectal cancer: A systematic review of the quality and nature of clinical prognostic tools for survival outcomes.
    Mahar AL; Compton C; Halabi S; Hess KR; Weiser MR; Groome PA
    J Surg Oncol; 2017 Dec; 116(8):969-982. PubMed ID: 28767139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prediction of surgical outcomes of laparoscopic liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma by defining surgical difficulty.
    Periyasamy M; Cho JY; Ahn S; Han HS; Yoon YS; Choi Y; Jang JS; Kwon SU; Kim S; Choi JK; Guro H
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5209-5218. PubMed ID: 28526962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical Utility of the Difficulty Scoring System for Predicting Surgical Time of Laparoscopic Liver Resection.
    Uchida H; Iwashita Y; Saga K; Takayama H; Watanabe K; Endo Y; Yada K; Ohta M; Inomata M
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Sep; 26(9):702-6. PubMed ID: 27352010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Validation of difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection in patients who underwent laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy.
    Im C; Cho JY; Han HS; Yoon YS; Choi Y; Jang JY; Choi H; Jang JS; Kwon SU
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jan; 31(1):430-436. PubMed ID: 27287898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Critical Assessment of Clinical Prognostic Tools in Melanoma.
    Mahar AL; Compton C; Halabi S; Hess KR; Gershenwald JE; Scolyer RA; Groome PA
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 23(9):2753-61. PubMed ID: 27052645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Early and Long-term Oncological Outcomes After Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Propensity Score-based Analysis.
    Allard MA; Cunha AS; Gayet B; Adam R; Goere D; Bachellier P; Azoulay D; Ayav A; Navarro F; Pessaux P;
    Ann Surg; 2015 Nov; 262(5):794-802. PubMed ID: 26583668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Refining Prognosis in Lung Cancer: A Report on the Quality and Relevance of Clinical Prognostic Tools.
    Mahar AL; Compton C; McShane LM; Halabi S; Asamura H; Rami-Porta R; Groome PA;
    J Thorac Oncol; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1576-89. PubMed ID: 26313682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection.
    Ban D; Kudo A; Ito H; Mitsunori Y; Matsumura S; Aihara A; Ochiai T; Tanaka S; Tanabe M; Itano O; Kaneko H; Wakabayashi G
    Updates Surg; 2015 Jun; 67(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 26160064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. From Louisville to Morioka: where is now MILS?
    Wakabayashi G
    Updates Surg; 2015 Jun; 67(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 26152554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.