80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30350105)
41. Laparoscopy-Specific Surgical Concepts for Hepatectomy Based on the Laparoscopic Caudal View: A Key to Reboot Surgeons' Minds.
Ogiso S; Nomi T; Araki K; Conrad C; Hatano E; Uemoto S; Fuks D; Gayet B
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22 Suppl 3():S327-33. PubMed ID: 26065871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement.
Collins GS; Reitsma JB; Altman DG; Moons KG
Br J Surg; 2015 Feb; 102(3):148-58. PubMed ID: 25627261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration.
Moons KG; Altman DG; Reitsma JB; Ioannidis JP; Macaskill P; Steyerberg EW; Vickers AJ; Ransohoff DF; Collins GS
Ann Intern Med; 2015 Jan; 162(1):W1-73. PubMed ID: 25560730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A new framework to enhance the interpretation of external validation studies of clinical prediction models.
Debray TP; Vergouwe Y; Koffijberg H; Nieboer D; Steyerberg EW; Moons KG
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Mar; 68(3):279-89. PubMed ID: 25179855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Morbidity assessment in surgery: refinement proposal based on a concept of perioperative adverse events.
Kazaryan AM; Røsok BI; Edwin B
ISRN Surg; 2013; 2013():625093. PubMed ID: 23762627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: results of a prospective multicentre analysis of 4,970 patients.
Lujan J; Valero G; Biondo S; Espin E; Parrilla P; Ortiz H
Surg Endosc; 2013 Jan; 27(1):295-302. PubMed ID: 22736289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Search filters for finding prognostic and diagnostic prediction studies in Medline to enhance systematic reviews.
Geersing GJ; Bouwmeester W; Zuithoff P; Spijker R; Leeflang M; Moons KG
PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e32844. PubMed ID: 22393453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Mentoring and telementoring leads to effective incorporation of laparoscopic colon surgery.
Schlachta CM; Lefebvre KL; Sorsdahl AK; Jayaraman S
Surg Endosc; 2010 Apr; 24(4):841-4. PubMed ID: 19707821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.
Dindo D; Demartines N; Clavien PA
Ann Surg; 2004 Aug; 240(2):205-13. PubMed ID: 15273542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial.
Leung KL; Kwok SP; Lam SC; Lee JF; Yiu RY; Ng SS; Lai PB; Lau WY
Lancet; 2004 Apr; 363(9416):1187-92. PubMed ID: 15081650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A hospital-based superconducting accelerator facility for negative pi-meson beam radiotherapy.
Kaplan HS; Schwettman HA; Fairbank WM; Boyd D; Bagshaw MA
Radiology; 1973 Jul; 108(1):159-72. PubMed ID: 4196729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. NG-hydroxy-L-arginine prevents the haemodynamic effects of nitric oxide synthesis inhibition in the anaesthetized rat.
Walder CE; Thiemermann C; Vane JR
Br J Pharmacol; 1992 Oct; 107(2):476-80. PubMed ID: 1422593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Critical appraisal of predictive tools to assess the difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review.
Hallet J; Pessaux P; Beyfuss KA; Jayaraman S; Serrano PE; Martel G; Coburn NG; Piardi T; Mahar AL
Surg Endosc; 2019 Feb; 33(2):366-376. PubMed ID: 30350105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies with propensity score-based analysis.
Zhang XL; Liu RF; Zhang D; Zhang YS; Wang T
Int J Surg; 2017 Aug; 44():191-203. PubMed ID: 28583897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection.
Ban D; Kudo A; Ito H; Mitsunori Y; Matsumura S; Aihara A; Ochiai T; Tanaka S; Tanabe M; Itano O; Kaneko H; Wakabayashi G
Updates Surg; 2015 Jun; 67(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 26160064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Systematic review and meta-analysis of difficulty scoring systems for laparoscopic and robotic liver resections.
Linn YL; Wu AG; Han HS; Liu R; Chen KH; Fuks D; Soubrane O; Cherqui D; Geller D; Cheung TT; Edwin B; Aldrighetti L; Abu Hilal M; Troisi RI; Wakabayashi G; Goh BKP;
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2023 Jan; 30(1):36-59. PubMed ID: 35780493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Effectiveness and safety of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for liver neoplasms: A meta-analysis of retrospective studies.
Hu L; Yao L; Li X; Jin P; Yang K; Guo T
Asian J Surg; 2018 Sep; 41(5):401-416. PubMed ID: 28912048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Can we expand the indications for laparoscopic liver resection? A systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic liver resection for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and chronic liver disease.
Morise Z; Ciria R; Cherqui D; Chen KH; Belli G; Wakabayashi G
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2015 May; 22(5):342-52. PubMed ID: 25663288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Clinical efficacy of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic liver resection: a meta analysis.
Guan R; Chen Y; Yang K; Ma D; Gong X; Shen B; Peng C
Asian J Surg; 2019 Jan; 42(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 30170946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
