256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30350165)
1. A reduced micro-dose protocol for 3D reconstruction of the spine in children with scoliosis: results of a phantom-based and clinically validated study using stereo-radiography.
Pedersen PH; Vergari C; Alzakri A; Vialle R; Skalli W
Eur Radiol; 2019 Apr; 29(4):1874-1881. PubMed ID: 30350165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. EOS microdose protocol for the radiological follow-up of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Ilharreborde B; Ferrero E; Alison M; Mazda K
Eur Spine J; 2016 Feb; 25(2):526-31. PubMed ID: 25906380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Nano-Dose Protocol For Cobb Angle Assessment in Children With Scoliosis: Results of a Phantom-based and Clinically Validated Study.
Pedersen PH; Vergari C; Tran A; Xavier F; Jaeger A; Laboudie P; Housset V; Eiskjær SP; Vialle R
Clin Spine Surg; 2019 Aug; 32(7):E340-E345. PubMed ID: 31162186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dose, image quality and spine modeling assessment of biplanar EOS micro-dose radiographs for the follow-up of in-brace adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients.
Morel B; Moueddeb S; Blondiaux E; Richard S; Bachy M; Vialle R; Ducou Le Pointe H
Eur Spine J; 2018 May; 27(5):1082-1088. PubMed ID: 29340779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Angle measurement reproducibility using EOS three-dimensional reconstructions in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by posterior instrumentation.
Ilharreborde B; Steffen JS; Nectoux E; Vital JM; Mazda K; Skalli W; Obeid I
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Sep; 36(20):E1306-13. PubMed ID: 21697768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of 3-dimensional spinal reconstruction accuracy: biplanar radiographs with EOS versus computed tomography.
Glaser DA; Doan J; Newton PO
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):1391-7. PubMed ID: 22415001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. EOS Micro-dose Protocol: First Full-spine Radiation Dose Measurements in Anthropomorphic Phantoms and Comparisons with EOS Standard-dose and Conventional Digital Radiology.
Pedersen PH; Petersen AG; Østgaard SE; Tvedebrink T; Eiskjær SP
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Nov; 43(22):E1313-E1321. PubMed ID: 30383725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New EOS Imaging Protocol Allows a Substantial Reduction in Radiation Exposure for Scoliosis Patients.
Newton PO; Khandwala Y; Bartley CE; Reighard FG; Bastrom TP; Yaszay B
Spine Deform; 2016 Mar; 4(2):138-144. PubMed ID: 27927546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical validation of coronal and sagittal spinal curve measurements based on three-dimensional vertebra vector parameters.
Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T
Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):960-8. PubMed ID: 23018164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional reconstruction using stereoradiography for evaluating adult spinal deformity: a reproducibility study.
Ferrero E; Lafage R; Vira S; Rohan PY; Oren J; Delsole E; Guigui P; Schwab F; Lafage V; Skalli W
Eur Spine J; 2017 Aug; 26(8):2112-2120. PubMed ID: 27817139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3D-modeling of the spine using EOS imaging system: Inter-reader reproducibility and reliability.
Rehm J; Germann T; Akbar M; Pepke W; Kauczor HU; Weber MA; Spira D
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171258. PubMed ID: 28152019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interrater reliability of three-dimensional reconstruction of the spine : Low-dose stereoradiography for evaluating bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Almansour H; Pepke W; Rehm J; Bruckner T; Spira D; Akbar M
Orthopade; 2020 Apr; 49(4):350-358. PubMed ID: 30899991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Paper #9: Nano-Dose Protocol for 3D Reconstruction of the Spine in Early Onset Scoliosis: Preliminary Results of a Phantom Based and Clinically Validated Study using Stereo-Radiography.
Pedersen PH; Xavier F; Vergari C; Skalli W; Eiskjær SP; Vialle R
Spine Deform; 2017 Nov; 5(6):444. PubMed ID: 31997201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy on the preoperative assessment of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using biplanar low-dose stereoradiography: a comparison with computed tomography.
Yeung KH; Man GCW; Lam TP; Ng BKW; Cheng JCY; Chu WCW
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Aug; 21(1):558. PubMed ID: 32811481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cumulative effective dose and cancer risk for pediatric population in repetitive full spine follow-up imaging: How micro dose is the EOS microdose protocol?
Law M; Ma WK; Lau D; Cheung K; Ip J; Yip L; Lam W
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():87-91. PubMed ID: 29571807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the scoliotic spine and pelvis from uncalibrated biplanar x-ray images.
Kadoury S; Cheriet F; Dansereau J; Labelle H
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Apr; 20(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 17414987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of EOS imaging for the assessment of scoliosis deformities: application to postoperative 3D quantitative analysis of the trunk.
Ilharreborde B; Dubousset J; Le Huec JC
Eur Spine J; 2014 Jul; 23 Suppl 4():S397-405. PubMed ID: 24811688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quasi-automatic early detection of progressive idiopathic scoliosis from biplanar radiography: a preliminary validation.
Vergari C; Gajny L; Courtois I; Ebermeyer E; Abelin-Genevois K; Kim Y; Langlais T; Vialle R; Assi A; Ghanem I; Dubousset J; Skalli W
Eur Spine J; 2019 Sep; 28(9):1970-1976. PubMed ID: 31076919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3D analysis of congenital scoliosis due to hemivertebra using biplanar radiography.
Humbert L; Steffen JS; Vialle R; Dubousset J; Vital JM; Skalli W
Eur Spine J; 2013 Feb; 22(2):379-86. PubMed ID: 23073744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of 3D reconstruction of the spine of mild scoliotic patients.
Gille O; Champain N; Benchikh-El-Fegoun A; Vital JM; Skalli W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 17334292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]