357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30350891)
1. Shared ways of thinking in Brazil about the science-practice interface in ecology and conservation.
Bertuol-Garcia D; Morsello C; N El-Hani C; Pardini R
Conserv Biol; 2020 Apr; 34(2):449-461. PubMed ID: 30350891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science-practice gap in ecology and conservation.
Bertuol-Garcia D; Morsello C; N El-Hani C; Pardini R
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2018 May; 93(2):1032-1055. PubMed ID: 29160024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Achieving conservation science that bridges the knowledge-action boundary.
Cook CN; Mascia MB; Schwartz MW; Possingham HP; Fuller RA
Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):669-78. PubMed ID: 23574343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploring Institutional Mechanisms for Scientific Input into the Management Cycle of the National Protected Area Network of Peru: Gaps and Opportunities.
López-Rodríguez MD; Castro H; Arenas M; Requena-Mullor JM; Cano A; Valenzuela E; Cabello J
Environ Manage; 2017 Dec; 60(6):1022-1041. PubMed ID: 28887588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bridging research and practice in conservation.
Kadykalo AN; Buxton RT; Morrison P; Anderson CM; Bickerton H; Francis CM; Smith AC; Fahrig L
Conserv Biol; 2021 Dec; 35(6):1725-1737. PubMed ID: 33738830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The case for policy-relevant conservation science.
Rose DC
Conserv Biol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):748-54. PubMed ID: 25545991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mainstreaming the social sciences in conservation.
Bennett NJ; Roth R; Klain SC; Chan KM; Clark DA; Cullman G; Epstein G; Nelson MP; Stedman R; Teel TL; Thomas RE; Wyborn C; Curran D; Greenberg A; Sandlos J; Veríssimo D
Conserv Biol; 2017 Feb; 31(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 27334309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bridging the divide between scientists and decision-makers: how behavioural ecologists can increase the conservation impact of their research?
Durant SM; Groom R; Kuloba B; Samna A; Muzuma U; Gadimang P; Mandisodza-Chikerema R; Ipavec A; Mitchell N; Ikanda D; Msuha M
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2019 Sep; 374(1781):20190011. PubMed ID: 31352894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Considering science needs to deliver actionable science.
Bisbal GA; Eaton MJ
Conserv Biol; 2023 Feb; 37(1):e14013. PubMed ID: 36193663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A typology of barriers and enablers of scientific evidence use in conservation practice.
Walsh JC; Dicks LV; Raymond CM; Sutherland WJ
J Environ Manage; 2019 Nov; 250():109481. PubMed ID: 31518795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exposing ecological and economic costs of the research-implementation gap and compromises in decision making.
Kareksela S; Moilanen A; Ristaniemi O; Välivaara R; Kotiaho JS
Conserv Biol; 2018 Feb; 32(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 29139572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contribution of systematic reviews to management decisions.
Cook CN; Possingham HP; Fuller RA
Conserv Biol; 2013 Oct; 27(5):902-15. PubMed ID: 24001025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The case for embedding researchers in conservation agencies.
Roux DJ; Kingsford RT; Cook CN; Carruthers J; Dickson K; Hockings M
Conserv Biol; 2019 Dec; 33(6):1266-1274. PubMed ID: 30950531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Practical actions for applied systematic conservation planning.
Botts EA; Pence G; Holness S; Sink K; Skowno A; Driver A; Harris LR; Desmet P; Escott B; Lötter M; Nel J; Smith T; Daniels F; Sinclair S; Stewart W; Manuel J
Conserv Biol; 2019 Dec; 33(6):1235-1246. PubMed ID: 30912598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of scientific evidence on conservation practitioners' management decisions.
Walsh JC; Dicks LV; Sutherland WJ
Conserv Biol; 2015 Feb; 29(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 25103469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. From science to action: Principles for undertaking environmental research that enables knowledge exchange and evidence-based decision-making.
Cvitanovic C; McDonald J; Hobday AJ
J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 183(Pt 3):864-874. PubMed ID: 27665124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enhancement of conservation knowledge through increased access to botanical information.
Canteiro C; Barcelos L; Filardi F; Forzza R; Green L; Lanna J; Leitman P; Milliken W; Pires Morim M; Patmore K; Phillips S; Walker B; Weech MH; Nic Lughadha E
Conserv Biol; 2019 Jun; 33(3):523-533. PubMed ID: 30809858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. When and how to use Q methodology to understand perspectives in conservation research.
Zabala A; Sandbrook C; Mukherjee N
Conserv Biol; 2018 Oct; 32(5):1185-1194. PubMed ID: 29707822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Closing the knowledge-action gap in conservation with open science.
Roche DG; O'Dea RE; Kerr KA; Rytwinski T; Schuster R; Nguyen VM; Young N; Bennett JR; Cooke SJ
Conserv Biol; 2022 Jun; 36(3):e13835. PubMed ID: 34476839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Organising evidence for environmental management decisions: a '4S' hierarchy.
Dicks LV; Walsh JC; Sutherland WJ
Trends Ecol Evol; 2014 Nov; 29(11):607-13. PubMed ID: 25280588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
