331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30352071)
1. What utility scores do mental health service users, healthcare professionals and members of the general public attribute to different health states? A co-produced mixed methods online survey.
Flood C; Barlow S; Simpson A; Burls A; Price A; Cartwright M; Brini S;
PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205223. PubMed ID: 30352071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Should "standard gamble" and "'time trade off" utility measurement be used more in mental health research?
Flood C
J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2010 Jun; 13(2):65-72. PubMed ID: 20919593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Health State Utility Measures in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.
Noel CW; Lee DJ; Kong Q; Xu W; Simpson C; Brown D; Gilbert RW; Gullane PJ; Irish JC; Huang SH; O'Sullivan B; Goldstein DP; de Almeida JR
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Aug; 141(8):696-703. PubMed ID: 26204439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of caregiver and parenting status on time trade-off and standard gamble utility scores for health state descriptions.
Matza LS; Boye KS; Feeny DH; Johnston JA; Bowman L; Jordan JB
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2014 Apr; 12():48. PubMed ID: 24716709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Health values of patients with systemic sclerosis.
Khanna D; Ahmed M; Furst DE; Ginsburg SS; Park GS; Hornung R; Tsevat J
Arthritis Rheum; 2007 Feb; 57(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 17266070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feasibility, comparability, and reliability of the standard gamble compared with the rating scale and time trade-off techniques in Korean population.
Kim SH; Lee SI; Jo MW
Qual Life Res; 2017 Dec; 26(12):3387-3397. PubMed ID: 28801862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing health utilities in schizophrenia. A feasibility study.
Voruganti LN; Awad AG; Oyewumi LK; Cortese L; Zirul S; Dhawan R
Pharmacoeconomics; 2000 Mar; 17(3):273-86. PubMed ID: 10947302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sagittal craniosynostosis: a utility outcomes study.
Kuta V; McNeely PD; Walling S; Bezuhly M
J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2017 Aug; 20(2):113-118. PubMed ID: 28524791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Health State Utilities for Patient's Current Health from Bipolar Type I Disorder.
Banihashemian M; Rashidian A; Gholamian F; Parsaeian M; Moradi N; Amini H
J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2018 Mar; 21(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 29643263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Valuing Child Health Utility 9D health states with a young adolescent sample: a feasibility study to compare best-worst scaling discrete-choice experiment, standard gamble and time trade-off methods.
Ratcliffe J; Couzner L; Flynn T; Sawyer M; Stevens K; Brazier J; Burgess L
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2011; 9(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 21033766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of respondent acceptability for preference measures in stuttering.
Franic DM; Bothe AK; Bramlett RE
J Commun Disord; 2012; 45(5):378-89. PubMed ID: 22682377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Harm-reduction approaches for self-cutting in inpatient mental health settings: Development and preliminary validation of the Attitudes to Self-cutting Management (ASc-Me) Scale.
Hosie L; Dickens GL
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2018 Nov; 25(9-10):531-545. PubMed ID: 30256488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Health utility bias: a systematic review and meta-analytic evaluation.
Doctor JN; Bleichrodt H; Lin HJ
Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 18556637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Utility values for specific chronic myeloid leukemia chronic phase health states from the general public in the United Kingdom.
Guest JF; Gray EJ; Szczudlo T; Magestro M
Leuk Lymphoma; 2014 Aug; 55(8):1870-5. PubMed ID: 24313831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Health utility ratings for a spectrum of alcohol-related health states.
Kraemer KL; Roberts MS; Horton NJ; Palfai T; Samet JH; Freedner N; Tibbetts N; Saitz R
Med Care; 2005 Jun; 43(6):541-50. PubMed ID: 15908848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Examination of assumptions in using time tradeoff and standard gamble utilities in individuals with spinal cord injury.
Lin MR; Yu WY; Wang SC
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Feb; 93(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 22289233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The time horizon matters: results of an exploratory study varying the timeframe in time trade-off and standard gamble utility elicitation.
Matza LS; Boye KS; Feeny DH; Bowman L; Johnston JA; Stewart KD; McDaniel K; Jordan J
Eur J Health Econ; 2016 Nov; 17(8):979-990. PubMed ID: 26611792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of health state utilities for dentofacial deformity as derived from patients and members of the general public.
Cunningham SJ; Hunt NP
Eur J Orthod; 2000 Jun; 22(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 10920566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity, feasibility and acceptability of time trade-off and standard gamble assessments in health valuation studies: a study in a multiethnic Asian population in Singapore.
Wee HL; Li SC; Xie F; Zhang XH; Luo N; Feeny D; Cheung YB; Machin D; Fong KY; Thumboo J
Value Health; 2008 Mar; 11 Suppl 1():S3-10. PubMed ID: 18387064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utility values for specific hepatic encephalopathy health states elicited from the general public in the United Kingdom.
Guest JF; Nanuwa K; Barden R
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2014 Jun; 12():89. PubMed ID: 24917331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
