834 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30352443)
1. Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultra-Mini PCNL, Flexible Ureteroscopy, and Shock Wave Lithotripsy on the Treatment of 1-2 cm Lower Pole Renal Calculi.
Zhang H; Hong TY; Li G; Jiang N; Hu C; Cui X; Chu C; Zhao JL
Urol Int; 2019; 102(2):153-159. PubMed ID: 30352443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness and efficiency of shockwave lithotripsy vs flexible ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi.
Koo V; Young M; Thompson T; Duggan B
BJU Int; 2011 Dec; 108(11):1913-6. PubMed ID: 21453346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment for residual stones using flexible ureteroscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy after the management of complex calculi with single-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Chen L; Sha ML; Li D; Zhuo J; Jiang CY; Zhu YP; Xia SJ; Lu J; Shao Y
Lasers Med Sci; 2017 Apr; 32(3):649-654. PubMed ID: 28161725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The "all-seeing needle" micro-PCNL versus flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower calyceal stones of ≤ 2 cm.
Jiang K; Chen H; Yu X; Chen Z; Ye Z; Yuan H
Urolithiasis; 2019 Apr; 47(2):201-206. PubMed ID: 29497768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a new choice for intrarenal stone patients.
Xu C; Song RJ; Jiang MJ; Qin C; Wang XL; Zhang W
Urol Int; 2015; 94(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 25074621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ultra-mini PCNL versus flexible ureteroscopy: a matched analysis of treatment costs (endoscopes and disposables) in patients with renal stones 10-20 mm.
Schoenthaler M; Wilhelm K; Hein S; Adams F; Schlager D; Wetterauer U; Hawizy A; Bourdoumis A; Desai J; Miernik A
World J Urol; 2015 Oct; 33(10):1601-5. PubMed ID: 25614255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective randomized comparison among SWL, PCNL and RIRS for lower calyceal stones less than 2 cm: a multicenter experience : A better understanding on the treatment options for lower pole stones.
Bozzini G; Verze P; Arcaniolo D; Dal Piaz O; Buffi NM; Guazzoni G; Provenzano M; Osmolorskij B; Sanguedolce F; Montanari E; Macchione N; Pummer K; Mirone V; De Sio M; Taverna G
World J Urol; 2017 Dec; 35(12):1967-1975. PubMed ID: 28875295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Primary SWL Is an Efficient and Cost-Effective Treatment for Lower Pole Renal Stones Between 10 and 20 mm in Size: A Large Single Center Study.
Chan LH; Good DW; Laing K; Phipps S; Thomas BG; Keanie JY; Tolley DA; Cutress ML
J Endourol; 2017 May; 31(5):510-516. PubMed ID: 28355100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultra-mini PCNL versus flexible ureteroscopy: a matched analysis of analgesic consumption and treatment-related patient satisfaction in patients with renal stones 10-35 mm.
Wilhelm K; Hein S; Adams F; Schlager D; Miernik A; Schoenthaler M
World J Urol; 2015 Dec; 33(12):2131-6. PubMed ID: 25971205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
Yuri P; Hariwibowo R; Soeroharjo I; Danarto R; Hendri AZ; Brodjonegoro SR; Rasyid N; Birowo P; Widyahening IS
Acta Med Indones; 2018 Jan; 50(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 29686172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Prospective Randomized Comparison Between Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Lower Caliceal Stones ≤2 cm: A Single-Center Experience.
Kumar A; Vasudeva P; Nanda B; Kumar N; Das MK; Jha SK
J Endourol; 2015 May; 29(5):575-9. PubMed ID: 25203489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ureteroscopy and laser stone fragmentation (URSL) for large (≥1 cm) paediatric stones: Outcomes from a university teaching hospital.
Featherstone NC; Somani BK; Griffin SJ
J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Apr; 13(2):202.e1-202.e7. PubMed ID: 28336220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Staged retrograde flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones of 2-4 cm in diameter: a randomized controlled trial].
Li JW; Wang F; Cai FZ; Gao HZ
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2016 Dec; 36(12):1672-1676. PubMed ID: 27998863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of large pediatric renal pelvic stone burden more than 2 cm.
Mohamed ER; Elmogazy HM; Zanaty AK; Elsharkawi AM; Riad AM; Badawy AA
J Pediatr Urol; 2023 Oct; 19(5):561.e1-561.e11. PubMed ID: 37414650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative analysis of retrograde intrarenal surgery and modified ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower pole renal stones (1.5-3.5 cm).
Li Z; Lai C; Shah AK; Xie W; Liu C; Huang L; Li K; Yu H; Xu K
BMC Urol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):27. PubMed ID: 32178654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mini vs standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones: a comparative study.
ElSheemy MS; Elmarakbi AA; Hytham M; Ibrahim H; Khadgi S; Al-Kandari AM
Urolithiasis; 2019 Apr; 47(2):207-214. PubMed ID: 29549382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for stones in anomalous-kidneys: a prospective study.
Khadgi S; Shrestha B; Ibrahim H; Shrestha S; ElSheemy MS; Al-Kandari AM
Urolithiasis; 2017 Aug; 45(4):407-414. PubMed ID: 27704184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endourologic Management (PCNL, URS, SWL) of Stones in Solitary Kidney: A Systematic Review from European Association of Urologists Young Academic Urologists and Uro-Technology Groups.
Pietropaolo A; Reeves T; Aboumarzouk O; Kallidonis P; Ozsoy M; Skolarikos A; Tailly T; Liatsikos E; Traxer O; Somani BK
J Endourol; 2020 Jan; 34(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 31456421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones.
Wu CF; Shee JJ; Lin WY; Lin CL; Chen CS
J Urol; 2004 Nov; 172(5 Pt 1):1899-902. PubMed ID: 15540749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Temporal Trends and Treatment Outcomes of Flexible Ureteroscopy for Lower Pole Stones in a Tertiary Referral Stone Center.
Orywal AK; Knipper AS; Tiburtius C; Gross AJ; Netsch C
J Endourol; 2015 Dec; 29(12):1371-8. PubMed ID: 26154282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
