BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

711 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30352528)

  • 61. New modalities of brain stimulation for stroke rehabilitation.
    Edwardson MA; Lucas TH; Carey JR; Fetz EE
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Feb; 224(3):335-58. PubMed ID: 23192336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The Effect of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation on Poststroke Cognitive Function: A Systematic Review.
    van Lieshout ECC; van Hooijdonk RF; Dijkhuizen RM; Visser-Meily JMA; Nijboer TCW
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2019 May; 33(5):355-374. PubMed ID: 31021702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Effects of Bilateral Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Post-Stroke Dysphagia.
    Park E; Kim MS; Chang WH; Oh SM; Kim YK; Lee A; Kim YH
    Brain Stimul; 2017; 10(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 27593709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The Effect of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS) on Attention and Memory Function in Stroke Rehabilitation Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Hara T; Shanmugalingam A; McIntyre A; Burhan AM
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 33546266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Protocols of non-invasive brain stimulation for neuroplasticity induction.
    He W; Fong PY; Leung TWH; Huang YZ
    Neurosci Lett; 2020 Feb; 719():133437. PubMed ID: 29476796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Systems Biology of Immunomodulation for Post-Stroke Neuroplasticity: Multimodal Implications of Pharmacotherapy and Neurorehabilitation.
    Alam MA; Subramanyam Rallabandi VP; Roy PK
    Front Neurol; 2016; 7():94. PubMed ID: 27445961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Adaptive Plasticity in the Healthy Language Network: Implications for Language Recovery after Stroke.
    Hartwigsen G
    Neural Plast; 2016; 2016():9674790. PubMed ID: 27830094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Improves Functional Recovery by Enhancing Neurogenesis and Activating BDNF/TrkB Signaling in Ischemic Rats.
    Luo J; Zheng H; Zhang L; Zhang Q; Li L; Pei Z; Hu X
    Int J Mol Sci; 2017 Feb; 18(2):. PubMed ID: 28230741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Role of 1 and 3 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor function recovery after acute ischaemic stroke.
    Khedr EM; Abdel-Fadeil MR; Farghali A; Qaid M
    Eur J Neurol; 2009 Dec; 16(12):1323-30. PubMed ID: 19780802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Narrative Review of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Stroke Rehabilitation.
    Shen QR; Hu MT; Feng W; Li KP; Wang W
    Med Sci Monit; 2022 Dec; 28():e938298. PubMed ID: 36457205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Contralesional Application of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Functional Improvement in Ischemic Stroke Mice.
    Ahn SM; Jung DH; Lee HJ; Pak ME; Jung YJ; Shin YI; Shin HK; Choi BT
    Stroke; 2020 Jul; 51(7):2208-2218. PubMed ID: 32521221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Stimulation targeting higher motor areas in stroke rehabilitation: A proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled study of effectiveness and underlying mechanisms.
    Cunningham DA; Varnerin N; Machado A; Bonnett C; Janini D; Roelle S; Potter-Baker K; Sankarasubramanian V; Wang X; Yue G; Plow EB
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2015; 33(6):911-26. PubMed ID: 26484700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Magnetic stimulation and movement-related cortical activity for acute stroke with hemiparesis.
    Matsuura A; Onoda K; Oguro H; Yamaguchi S
    Eur J Neurol; 2015 Dec; 22(12):1526-32. PubMed ID: 26177235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Upper Extremity Motor Recovery: Does It Help?
    Schambra HM
    Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep; 2018 Oct; 18(12):97. PubMed ID: 30353408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with functional task training on motor recovery in stroke patients.
    Al-Hussain F; Nasim E; Iqbal M; Altwaijri N; Asim N; Yoo WK; Bashir S
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Feb; 100(6):e24718. PubMed ID: 33578615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on upper extremity motor recovery and functional outcomes in chronic stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial.
    Aşkın A; Tosun A; Demirdal ÜS
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2017 Jun; 34(2):102-107. PubMed ID: 28427299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. An update on medications and noninvasive brain stimulation to augment language rehabilitation in post-stroke aphasia.
    Saxena S; Hillis AE
    Expert Rev Neurother; 2017 Nov; 17(11):1091-1107. PubMed ID: 28847186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with transcranial direct current stimulation on post-stroke dysmnesia: A preliminary study.
    Hu AM; Huang CY; He JG; Wu L
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2023 Aug; 231():107797. PubMed ID: 37263069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Vision modulation, plasticity and restoration using non-invasive brain stimulation - An IFCN-sponsored review.
    Sabel BA; Thut G; Haueisen J; Henrich-Noack P; Herrmann CS; Hunold A; Kammer T; Matteo B; Sergeeva EG; Waleszczyk W; Antal A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2020 Apr; 131(4):887-911. PubMed ID: 32078919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of motor cortex after stroke: a focused review.
    Corti M; Patten C; Triggs W
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Mar; 91(3):254-70. PubMed ID: 22042336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.