These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30353278)

  • 1. 3D hindfoot alignment measurements based on low-dose biplanar radiographs: a clinical feasibility study.
    Rosskopf AB; Sutter R; Pfirrmann CWA; Buck FM
    Skeletal Radiol; 2019 May; 48(5):707-712. PubMed ID: 30353278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional hindfoot alignment measurements based on biplanar radiographs: comparison with standard radiographic measurements.
    Sutter R; Pfirrmann CW; Espinosa N; Buck FM
    Skeletal Radiol; 2013 Apr; 42(4):493-8. PubMed ID: 23179737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Femoral and tibial torsion measurements in children and adolescents: comparison of MRI and 3D models based on low-dose biplanar radiographs.
    Rosskopf AB; Buck FM; Pfirrmann CW; Ramseier LE
    Skeletal Radiol; 2017 Apr; 46(4):469-476. PubMed ID: 28154901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) lower limb measurements in adults: Comparison of micro-dose and low-dose biplanar radiographs.
    Rosskopf AB; Pfirrmann CW; Buck FM
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Sep; 26(9):3054-62. PubMed ID: 26738507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Femoral and tibial torsion measurements with 3D models based on low-dose biplanar radiographs in comparison with standard CT measurements.
    Buck FM; Guggenberger R; Koch PP; Pfirrmann CW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Nov; 199(5):W607-12. PubMed ID: 23096205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acetabular coverage differs between standing and supine positions: model-based assessment of low-dose biplanar radiographs and comparison with CT.
    Fritz B; Agten CA; Boldt FK; Zingg PO; Pfirrmann CWA; Sutter R
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Oct; 29(10):5691-5699. PubMed ID: 30903332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Femoral and tibial torsion measurement in children and adolescents: comparison of 3D models based on low-dose biplanar radiography and low-dose CT.
    Rosskopf AB; Ramseier LE; Sutter R; Pfirrmann CW; Buck FM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):W285-91. PubMed ID: 24555627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hindfoot alignment of adult acquired flatfoot deformity: A comparison of clinical assessment and weightbearing cone beam CT examinations.
    de Cesar Netto C; Shakoor D; Roberts L; Chinanuvathana A; Mousavian A; Lintz F; Schon LC; Demehri S;
    Foot Ankle Surg; 2019 Dec; 25(6):790-797. PubMed ID: 30455094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of lower limb length and alignment by biplanar linear radiography: comparison with supine CT and upright full-length radiography.
    Guggenberger R; Pfirrmann CW; Koch PP; Buck FM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Feb; 202(2):W161-7. PubMed ID: 24450698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hindfoot alignment measurements: rotation-stability of measurement techniques on hindfoot alignment view and long axial view radiographs.
    Buck FM; Hoffmann A; Mamisch-Saupe N; Espinosa N; Resnick D; Hodler J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Sep; 197(3):578-82. PubMed ID: 21862799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of hindfoot alignment using MRI and standing hindfoot alignment radiographs (Saltzman view).
    Büber N; Zanetti M; Frigg A; Saupe N
    Skeletal Radiol; 2018 Jan; 47(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 28799095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlation of Clinical Evaluation and Radiographic Hindfoot Alignment in Stage II Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity.
    de Cesar Netto C; Kunas GC; Soukup D; Marinescu A; Ellis SJ
    Foot Ankle Int; 2018 Jul; 39(7):771-779. PubMed ID: 29589785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurement of acetabular version based on biplanar radiographs with 3D reconstructions in comparison to CT as reference standard in cadavers.
    Agten CA; Jonczy M; Ullrich O; Pfirrmann CWA; Sutter R; Buck FM
    Clin Anat; 2017 Jul; 30(5):591-598. PubMed ID: 28295578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simulated radiographic bone and joint modeling from 3D ankle MRI: feasibility and comparison with radiographs and 2D MRI.
    Nordeck SM; Koerper CE; Adler A; Malhotra V; Xi Y; Liu GT; Chhabra A
    Skeletal Radiol; 2017 May; 46(5):651-664. PubMed ID: 28265698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inter-observer reliability of measurements performed on digital long-leg standing radiographs and assessment of validity compared to 3D CT-scan.
    Boonen B; Kerens B; Schotanus MG; Emans P; Jong B; Kort NP
    Knee; 2016 Jan; 23(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 26746040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring hindfoot alignment radiographically: the long axial view is more reliable than the hindfoot alignment view.
    Reilingh ML; Beimers L; Tuijthof GJ; Stufkens SA; Maas M; van Dijk CN
    Skeletal Radiol; 2010 Nov; 39(11):1103-8. PubMed ID: 20062985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Foot in the Weightbearing Position From Biplanar Radiographs: Evaluation of Accuracy and Reliability.
    Rohan PY; Perrier A; Ramanoudjame M; Hausselle J; Lelièvre H; Seringe R; Skalli W; Wicart P
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2018; 57(5):931-937. PubMed ID: 30001938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intraoperative assessment of hindfoot alignment using C-arm fluoroscopy.
    Park YU; Lee JW; Chung JY; Choi WS; Kim T; Seo YW
    J Orthop Sci; 2023 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 37839978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Republication of "How Accurate Is Clinical Evaluation in Hindfoot Coronal Alignment?".
    Slullitel G; Álvarez V; Lopez V; Calvi JP; Calvo AB
    Foot Ankle Orthop; 2023 Jul; 8(3):24730114231188111. PubMed ID: 37498790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability and correlation analysis of computed methods to convert conventional 2D radiological hindfoot measurements to a 3D setting using weightbearing CT.
    Burssens A; Peeters J; Peiffer M; Marien R; Lenaerts T; ; Vandeputte G; Victor J
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Dec; 13(12):1999-2008. PubMed ID: 29524088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.