These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

518 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30353585)

  • 1. Prospective external validation of IOTA three-step strategy for characterizing and classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of alternative two-step strategy using simple-rules risk.
    Hidalgo JJ; Ros F; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana Á; Alcázar JL
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):693-700. PubMed ID: 30353585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. External validation of IOTA simple descriptors and simple rules for classifying adnexal masses.
    Alcázar JL; Pascual MA; Graupera B; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana A; Hereter L; Ajossa S; Guerriero S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 48(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 26748432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of IOTA Simple Rules, Simple Rules risk assessment, ADNEX model and O-RADS in differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions in North American women.
    Hiett AK; Sonek JD; Guy M; Reid TJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 May; 59(5):668-676. PubMed ID: 34533862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective external validation of IOTA methods for classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of two-step strategy using benign descriptors and ADNEX: a Portuguese multicenter study.
    Borges AL; Brito M; Ambrósio P; Condeço R; Pinto P; Ambrósio B; Mahomed F; Gama JMR; Bernardo MJ; Gouveia AI; Djokovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38477149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Prospective External Validation of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Simple Rules in the Hands of Level I and II Examiners.
    Knafel A; Banas T; Nocun A; Wiechec M; Jach R; Ludwin A; Kabzinska-Turek M; Pietrus M; Pitynski K
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Oct; 37(5):516-523. PubMed ID: 26126150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ultrasound examination, MRI, or ROMA for discriminating between inconclusive adnexal masses as determined by IOTA Simple Rules: a prospective study.
    Chacon E; Arraiza M; Manzour N; Benito A; Mínguez JÁ; Vázquez-Vicente D; Castellanos T; Chiva L; Alcazar JL
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2023 Jun; 33(6):951-956. PubMed ID: 37055169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simple descriptors and simple rules of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group: a prospective study of combined use for the description of adnexal masses.
    Peces Rama A; Llanos Llanos MC; Sánchez Ferrer ML; Alcázar Zambrano JL; Martínez Mendoza A; Nieto Díaz A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Dec; 195():7-11. PubMed ID: 26461961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic performance of IOTA simple rules for adnexal masses classification: a comparison between two centers with different ovarian cancer prevalence.
    Ruiz de Gauna B; Rodriguez D; Olartecoechea B; Aubá M; Jurado M; Gómez Roig MD; Alcázar JL
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Aug; 191():10-4. PubMed ID: 26066289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of IOTA three-step strategy and logistic regression model LR2 for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Hidalgo JJ; Llueca A; Zolfaroli I; Veiga N; Ortiz E; Alcázar JL
    Med Ultrason; 2021 May; 23(2):168-175. PubMed ID: 33626112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two-Step Strategy for Optimizing the Preoperative Classification of Adnexal Masses in a University Hospital, Using International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Models: Simple Rules and Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa Model.
    Esquivel Villabona AL; Rodríguez JN; Ayala N; Buriticá C; Gómez AC; Velandia AM; Rodríguez N; Alcázar JL
    J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Feb; 41(2):471-482. PubMed ID: 33890698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of different strategies to triage women with adnexal masses: a prospective study.
    Piovano E; Cavallero C; Fuso L; Viora E; Ferrero A; Gregori G; Grillo C; Macchi C; Mengozzi G; Mitidieri M; Pagano E; Zola P
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 50(3):395-403. PubMed ID: 27706929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules and the risk of malignancy index to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Auekitrungrueng R; Tinnangwattana D; Tantipalakorn C; Charoenratana C; Lerthiranwong T; Wanapirak C; Tongsong T
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 146(3):364-369. PubMed ID: 31206642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of IOTA Simple Rules, IOTA ADNEX Model, RMI, and Subjective Assessment for Preoperative Adnexal Mass Evaluation: The Experience of a Tertiary Care Referral Hospital.
    Vilendecic Z; Radojevic M; Stefanovic K; Dotlic J; Likic Ladjevic I; Dugalic S; Stefanovic A
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2023; 88(2):116-122. PubMed ID: 36716716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of IOTA ADNEX model in evaluating adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center in China.
    Chen H; Qian L; Jiang M; Du Q; Yuan F; Feng W
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 54(6):815-822. PubMed ID: 31152572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective evaluation of IOTA logistic regression models LR1 and LR2 in comparison with subjective pattern recognition for diagnosis of ovarian cancer in an outpatient setting.
    Nunes N; Ambler G; Foo X; Widschwendter M; Jurkovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 51(6):829-835. PubMed ID: 28976616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lesion size affects diagnostic performance of IOTA logistic regression models, IOTA simple rules and risk of malignancy index in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Di Legge A; Testa AC; Ameye L; Van Calster B; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Savelli L; Franchi D; Czekierdowski A; Trio D; Van Holsbeke C; Ferrazzi E; Scambia G; Timmerman D; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 22611001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. IOTA simple rules for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses: prospective external validation.
    Alcázar JL; Pascual MÁ; Olartecoechea B; Graupera B; Aubá M; Ajossa S; Hereter L; Julve R; Gastón B; Peddes C; Sedda F; Piras A; Saba L; Guerriero S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Oct; 42(4):467-71. PubMed ID: 23576304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. IOTA Simple Rules in Differentiating between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses by Non-expert Examiners.
    Tinnangwattana D; Vichak-Ururote L; Tontivuthikul P; Charoenratana C; Lerthiranwong T; Tongsong T
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(9):3835-8. PubMed ID: 25987045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: prospective validation by IOTA group.
    Timmerman D; Ameye L; Fischerova D; Epstein E; Melis GB; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Lissoni AA; Testa AC; Veldman J; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Bourne T; Valentin L
    BMJ; 2010 Dec; 341():c6839. PubMed ID: 21156740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating use of IOTA two-step strategy to classify adnexal masses identified in pregnancy: pilot study.
    Barcroft J; Pandrich M; Del Forno S; Cooper N; Linton-Reid K; Landolfo C; Timmerman D; Saso S; Bourne T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38787921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.