194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30353613)
1. Xist Intron 1 Repression by Transcriptional-Activator-Like Effectors Designer Transcriptional Factor Improves Somatic Cell Reprogramming in Mice.
Zhang J; Gao X; Yang J; Fan X; Wang W; Liang Y; Fan L; Han H; Xu X; Tang F; Bao S; Liu P; Li X
Stem Cells; 2019 May; 37(5):599-608. PubMed ID: 30353613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reactivation of the inactive X chromosome and post-transcriptional reprogramming of Xist in iPSCs.
Kim JS; Choi HW; Araúzo-Bravo MJ; Schöler HR; Do JT
J Cell Sci; 2015 Jan; 128(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 25380819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Xist repression shows time-dependent effects on the reprogramming of female somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells.
Chen Q; Gao S; He W; Kou X; Zhao Y; Wang H; Gao S
Stem Cells; 2014 Oct; 32(10):2642-56. PubMed ID: 24965076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The State of Skewed X Chromosome Inactivation is Retained in the Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from a Female with Hemophilia B.
Lyu C; Shen J; Zhang J; Xue F; Liu X; Liu W; Fu R; Zhang L; Li H; Zhang D; Zhang X; Cheng T; Yang R; Zhang L
Stem Cells Dev; 2017 Jul; 26(13):1003-1011. PubMed ID: 28401797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Single-Cell XIST Expression in Human Preimplantation Embryos and Newly Reprogrammed Female Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.
Briggs SF; Dominguez AA; Chavez SL; Reijo Pera RA
Stem Cells; 2015 Jun; 33(6):1771-81. PubMed ID: 25753947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic reversal of random X-Chromosome inactivation during iPSC reprogramming.
Janiszewski A; Talon I; Chappell J; Collombet S; Song J; De Geest N; To SK; Bervoets G; Marin-Bejar O; Provenzano C; Vanheer L; Marine JC; Rambow F; Pasque V
Genome Res; 2019 Oct; 29(10):1659-1672. PubMed ID: 31515287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Antagonist Xist and Tsix co-transcription during mouse oogenesis and maternal Xist expression during pre-implantation development calls into question the nature of the maternal imprint on the X chromosome.
Deuve JL; Bonnet-Garnier A; Beaujean N; Avner P; Morey C
Epigenetics; 2015; 10(10):931-42. PubMed ID: 26267271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chromosome compartments on the inactive X guide TAD formation independently of transcription during X-reactivation.
Bauer M; Vidal E; Zorita E; Üresin N; Pinter SF; Filion GJ; Payer B
Nat Commun; 2021 Jun; 12(1):3499. PubMed ID: 34108480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. XIST Derepression in Active X Chromosome Hinders Pig Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer.
Ruan D; Peng J; Wang X; Ouyang Z; Zou Q; Yang Y; Chen F; Ge W; Wu H; Liu Z; Zhao Y; Zhao B; Zhang Q; Lai C; Fan N; Zhou Z; Liu Q; Li N; Jin Q; Shi H; Xie J; Song H; Yang X; Chen J; Wang K; Li X; Lai L
Stem Cell Reports; 2018 Feb; 10(2):494-508. PubMed ID: 29337117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Serum starvation-induced cell cycle synchronization stimulated mouse rDNA transcription reactivation during somatic cell reprogramming into iPSCs.
Zhao Q; Wu Y; Shan Z; Bai G; Wang Z; Hu J; Liu L; Li T; Shen J; Lei L
Stem Cell Res Ther; 2016 Aug; 7(1):112. PubMed ID: 27515169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. X chromosome inactivation and epigenetic responses to cellular reprogramming.
Lessing D; Anguera MC; Lee JT
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet; 2013; 14():85-110. PubMed ID: 23662665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reactivation of the inactive X chromosome in development and reprogramming.
Ohhata T; Wutz A
Cell Mol Life Sci; 2013 Jul; 70(14):2443-61. PubMed ID: 23052214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Round Spermatid Injection Rescues Female Lethality of a Paternally Inherited Xist Deletion in Mouse.
Federici F; Magaraki A; Wassenaar E; van Veen-Buurman CJ; van de Werken C; Baart EB; Laven JS; Grootegoed JA; Gribnau J; Baarends WM
PLoS Genet; 2016 Oct; 12(10):e1006358. PubMed ID: 27716834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Histone variants enriched in oocytes enhance reprogramming to induced pluripotent stem cells.
Shinagawa T; Takagi T; Tsukamoto D; Tomaru C; Huynh LM; Sivaraman P; Kumarevel T; Inoue K; Nakato R; Katou Y; Sado T; Takahashi S; Ogura A; Shirahige K; Ishii S
Cell Stem Cell; 2014 Feb; 14(2):217-27. PubMed ID: 24506885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The pluripotency factor-bound intron 1 of Xist is dispensable for X chromosome inactivation and reactivation in vitro and in vivo.
Minkovsky A; Barakat TS; Sellami N; Chin MH; Gunhanlar N; Gribnau J; Plath K
Cell Rep; 2013 Mar; 3(3):905-18. PubMed ID: 23523354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. New Insights into X-Chromosome Reactivation during Reprogramming to Pluripotency.
Panda A; Zylicz JJ; Pasque V
Cells; 2020 Dec; 9(12):. PubMed ID: 33348832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Ftx Noncoding Locus Controls X Chromosome Inactivation Independently of Its RNA Products.
Furlan G; Gutierrez Hernandez N; Huret C; Galupa R; van Bemmel JG; Romito A; Heard E; Morey C; Rougeulle C
Mol Cell; 2018 May; 70(3):462-472.e8. PubMed ID: 29706539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Xist-dependent imprinted X inactivation and the early developmental consequences of its failure.
Borensztein M; Syx L; Ancelin K; Diabangouaya P; Picard C; Liu T; Liang JB; Vassilev I; Galupa R; Servant N; Barillot E; Surani A; Chen CJ; Heard E
Nat Struct Mol Biol; 2017 Mar; 24(3):226-233. PubMed ID: 28134930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new Xist allele driven by a constitutively active promoter is dominated by Xist locus environment and exhibits the parent-of-origin effects.
Amakawa Y; Sakata Y; Hoki Y; Arata S; Shioda S; Fukagawa T; Sasaki H; Sado T
Development; 2015 Dec; 142(24):4299-308. PubMed ID: 26511926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dynamic interplay and function of multiple noncoding genes governing X chromosome inactivation.
Yue M; Charles Richard JL; Ogawa Y
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2016 Jan; 1859(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 26260844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
